On 2011-05-30 12:16:13 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
libtool .la files are useful if:
* you're linking against a library installed in a directory that isn't
searched by the dynamic linker by default (e.g. installing a local
library in --prefix=$HOME, and a program that links that library
On Tue, 31 May 2011 18:48:30 +0200
Vincent Lefevre vinc...@vinc17.net wrote:
On 2011-05-30 12:16:13 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
libtool .la files are useful if:
* you're linking against a library installed in a directory that isn't
searched by the dynamic linker by default (e.g.
On 2011-05-27 00:17:45 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 26.05.2011 23:26, schrieb Luk Claes:
There are some good reasons to keep some specific *.la files around,
Just curious: what are these reasons / use case for keeping la files?
They are at least read by libtool. For instance, when
On Mon, 30 May 2011 12:23:35 +0200
Vincent Lefevre vinc...@vinc17.net wrote:
On 2011-05-27 00:17:45 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 26.05.2011 23:26, schrieb Luk Claes:
There are some good reasons to keep some specific *.la files around,
Just curious: what are these reasons / use
On Mon, 30 May 2011 at 12:23:35 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
They are at least read by libtool. For instance, when building MPFR
(as a normal user):
[...]
Either the information provided by /usr/lib/libgmp.la is important
and this file should be kept, or libtool should not attempt to read
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 12:16:13PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2011 at 12:23:35 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
They are at least read by libtool. For instance, when building MPFR
(as a normal user):
[...]
Either the information provided by /usr/lib/libgmp.la is important
On Fri, 27 May 2011 00:17:45 +0200
Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org wrote:
Am 26.05.2011 23:26, schrieb Luk Claes:
There are some good reasons to keep some specific *.la files around,
Just curious: what are these reasons / use case for keeping la files?
Plugins which us libltdl use the .la
On Thu, 26 May 2011 23:26:26 +0200
Luk Claes l...@debian.org wrote:
On 05/26/2011 11:55 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 26.05.2011 10:46, schrieb Simon McVittie:
On Thu, 26 May 2011 at 08:47:06 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Comments welcome, but foremost I'd like a mass effort to clear the
Hi
Just to remember people that one can follow the status of the .la file
dependency_libs clearing goal at Andreas' overview page [1].
A package entry followed by nothing more than a colon (:) means that the
package ships an .la file with a cleared dependency_libs field.
A package entry that
On Thu, 26 May 2011 at 08:47:06 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Comments welcome, but foremost I'd like a mass effort to clear the
remaining dependency_libs fields! :-)
Am I right in thinking that this is the process people should follow?
if depended-on:
if dependency_libs:
clear the
Hi,
sed -i /dependency_libs/ s/'.*'/''/
$(CURDIR)/debian/pkg/usr/lib/la-file
Comments welcome, but foremost I'd like a mass effort to clear the
remaining dependency_libs fields! :-)
gnome-pkg-tools package is already providing a cdbs makefile snippet
that does the same thing on all .la
Am 26.05.2011 10:46, schrieb Simon McVittie:
On Thu, 26 May 2011 at 08:47:06 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Comments welcome, but foremost I'd like a mass effort to clear the
remaining dependency_libs fields! :-)
Am I right in thinking that this is the process people should follow?
if
On 11-05-26 at 11:16am, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
Hi,
sed -i /dependency_libs/ s/'.*'/''/
$(CURDIR)/debian/pkg/usr/lib/la-file
Comments welcome, but foremost I'd like a mass effort to clear the
remaining dependency_libs fields! :-)
gnome-pkg-tools package is already providing a
Le jeudi 26 mai 2011 à 12:26 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
Do anyone perhaps have an opinion on Peter's suggestion in that
bugreport?:
I think in order of preference, this should be fixed by patching
libtool, or by a debhelper tool, and only then maybe in cdbs. This
way you can
[Michael Biebl]
Clearing the dependency_libs is always safe, afaics, so I'd rather say it is
something like
if depended-on
clear dependency_libs
else
remove *.la files
Seems like the following would work instead:
remove *.la files
if depended-on
request some
On 05/26/2011 11:55 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 26.05.2011 10:46, schrieb Simon McVittie:
On Thu, 26 May 2011 at 08:47:06 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Comments welcome, but foremost I'd like a mass effort to clear the
remaining dependency_libs fields! :-)
Am I right in thinking that this is the
On 05/26/2011 06:04 PM, Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Michael Biebl]
Clearing the dependency_libs is always safe, afaics, so I'd rather say it is
something like
if depended-on
clear dependency_libs
else
remove *.la files
Seems like the following would work instead:
remove
Am 26.05.2011 23:26, schrieb Luk Claes:
There are some good reasons to keep some specific *.la files around,
Just curious: what are these reasons / use case for keeping la files?
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?
18 matches
Mail list logo
