On Saturday 07 May 2011 15:14:59 Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 07 May 2011, Jakub Wilk wrote:
This works both ways. If a NMUer uploaded my package without a delay
and without a good reason[0], I want to be able to yell at him „you
are a jerk (according to Developers Reference)!”
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
So, my experience with #624819 was basically this. The bug was
reported, followed by an NMU upload about 45 minutes after the bug was
initially reported. Please don't misunderstand. I appreciate that the
submitter was proactive. However, emailing the patch first
On Sat, 07 May 2011 15:08:37 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
But I agree that this policy should not force maintainers of several
packages to ping their bug logs every 7 days, although at the very
minimum I do expect a maintainer to post to an RC bug log at least once
an I'm on it message.
On Fri, 06 May 2011, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
A patch was proposed (#625449) to implement in dvelopers-reference the
DELAYED/0 for upload fixing only release-critical bugs older than 7 days,
without maintainer activity for 7 days policy.
I don't think that this policy is a good idea. But, since
* Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org, 2011-05-07, 09:12:
A patch was proposed (#625449) to implement in dvelopers-reference the
DELAYED/0 for upload fixing only release-critical bugs older than 7
days, without maintainer activity for 7 days policy.
I don't think that this policy is a good
Le Fri, May 06, 2011 at 11:14:55PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
- The dev-ref documents the default choice. While there are cases where I
agree that uploading the fixed package ASAP is necessary, in most cases, we
can probably survive two more days with the bug, if we already survived
Hi,
On Sat, 07 May 2011, Jakub Wilk wrote:
This works both ways. If a NMUer uploaded my package without a delay
and without a good reason[0], I want to be able to yell at him „you
are a jerk (according to Developers Reference)!”
No.
First off, I never said that the rules are there to be able
On Sat, 7 May 2011 12:51:46 +0200
Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
[0] No, 7 days without activity in the bug log is not a good enough
reason. Let's turn our empathy on and face it: we are not bug-fixing
monkeys and 7 days is a very short time frame.
It's 7 days without maintainer
On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 12:51:46PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
This works both ways. If a NMUer uploaded my package without a delay
and without a good reason[0], I want to be able to yell at him „you
are
a jerk (according to Developers Reference)!”
Unfortunately, clueless NMUers do exist. :(
Hi,
In http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2011/03/msg00016.html,
the release team writes:
0-day NMU policy
For some time now, we have had a perpetual 0-day NMU policy, and some
discussion [LDO:0day] was had a while ago. We feel that this has worked
well for the
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 11:14:55PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
- Doing an NMU without trying to contact the maintainer beforehand could be
considered an aggressive behaviour, or a way to punish the maintainer for
not addressing bugs as fast as one would like. We are trying hard to fight
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 18:38 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 11:14:55PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
- Doing an NMU without trying to contact the maintainer beforehand could be
considered an aggressive behaviour, or a way to punish the maintainer
for
not
12 matches
Mail list logo
