On 16 June 2010 03:21, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Tim Retout dioc...@debian.org wrote:
(Advance warning: I'm interested in discussing the mentoring process
at DebConf.)
Please register a BoF in penta about it to give folks more advance warning.
I've
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 14:59:04 -0700
Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 08:50:28AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
What about if Debian QA packages were all to be deemed suitable for
DM upload, including those which have been orphaned for over 2
months without a
[Jakub Wilk, 2010-06-15]
I consider QA/adoption uploads without DD assistance unacceptable.
+1
--
Piotr Ożarowski Debian GNU/Linux Developer
www.ozarowski.pl www.griffith.cc www.debian.org
GPG Fingerprint: 1D2F A898 58DA AF62 1786 2DF7 AEF6 F1A2 A745
On Wednesday 16 June 2010, Tim Retout wrote:
On 15 June 2010 21:59, Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org wrote:
Encouraging maintainers to invest their time in QA
makes more sense than adding more NEW packages to become the QA
workload of the future. Directing everyone at NEW is
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 23:03:33 +0200
Vincent Danjean vdanjean...@free.fr wrote:
On 11/06/2010 09:54, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Right, I was being silly. Also, the word experimental adds more fear
to the user than just devel, which is good. Let me rephrase then. How
about we accept MORE packages
Hi!
Am 15.06.2010 09:50, schrieb Neil Williams:
OTOH if those requesting sponsorship were more open to packaging some of
the orphaned packages listed under WNPP and qa.debian.org which
have already been through NEW
[..]
What about if Debian QA packages were all to be deemed suitable for
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:12:22 +0200
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl alexan...@schmehl.info wrote:
Hi!
Am 15.06.2010 09:50, schrieb Neil Williams:
OTOH if those requesting sponsorship were more open to packaging some of
the orphaned packages listed under WNPP and qa.debian.org which
have
* Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org, 2010-06-15, 08:50:
What about if Debian QA packages were all to be deemed suitable for DM
upload, including those which have been orphaned for over 2 months
without a change of maintainer? Maybe when an orphaned package is
uploaded with the change of
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 21:28:19 +0200
Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
* Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org, 2010-06-15, 08:50:
What about if Debian QA packages were all to be deemed suitable for
DM upload, including those which have been orphaned for over 2 months
without a change of
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 08:50:28AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
What about if Debian QA packages were all to be deemed suitable for DM
upload, including those which have been orphaned for over 2 months
without a change of maintainer? Maybe when an orphaned package is
uploaded with the change of
On 15 June 2010 21:59, Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org wrote:
Encouraging maintainers to invest their time in QA
makes more sense than adding more NEW packages to become the QA
workload of the future. Directing everyone at NEW is counter-productive
and encourages more horrible first-time
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Tim Retout dioc...@debian.org wrote:
(Advance warning: I'm interested in discussing the mentoring process
at DebConf.)
Please register a BoF in penta about it to give folks more advance warning.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To
On 11/06/2010 09:54, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Right, I was being silly. Also, the word experimental adds more fear
to the user than just devel, which is good. Let me rephrase then. How
about we accept MORE packages with LESS checks in Experimental, and have
new maintainers forced in that
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 10:17:00AM +0200, Andreas Marschke wrote:
On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 00:58 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 06:01:27 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
My 2nd suggestion is coming from the Maemo platform (the OS behind
the Nokia n900 that is Debian based).
I'm not still a DD, and I would like to have an easier way to get my
packages into Debian. But I'm afraid by opening up the experimental
section, quality will be sacrificed. Just look at quality of some
packages in universe of Ubuntu. Some of them even don't have a
reasonable summary!
On Fri, Jun
Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
On 06/10/2010 06:01 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
My 2nd suggestion is coming from the Maemo platform (the OS behind
the Nokia n900 that is Debian based). In Maemo, there is a devel
repository that includes apps that aren't necessarily in good
On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 00:58 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 06:01:27 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
My 2nd suggestion is coming from the Maemo platform (the OS behind
the Nokia n900 that is Debian based). In Maemo, there is a devel
repository that includes apps that aren't
On Jun 11, 2010, at 10:17, Andreas Marschke wrote:
On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 00:58 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 06:01:27 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
My 2nd suggestion is coming from the Maemo platform (the OS behind
the Nokia n900 that is Debian based). In Maemo, there is
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:13:35AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
Sometimes the package is beyond my skill level (such as Java or
complicated maintainer scripts) or written in languages I strongly
dislike (PHP), which means I review part of the package and will not
sponsor it.
---end quoted text---
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 06:01:27 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
My 2nd suggestion is coming from the Maemo platform (the OS behind
the Nokia n900 that is Debian based). In Maemo, there is a devel
repository that includes apps that aren't necessarily in good shape. The
users know that fact when they
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
My sponsoring preferences are available from
URL: http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/debian-sponsoring.html . To
make sure I have direct contact with the prospective package
maintainer and avoid a backlog of packages I should have sponsored, I
want to be contacted
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/10/2010 06:01 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
My 2nd suggestion is coming from the Maemo platform (the OS behind
the Nokia n900 that is Debian based). In Maemo, there is a devel
repository that includes apps that
Hi all,
I'm a simple debian contributor: I'm trying to get my work in debian
through a sponsor [1] [2]. The problem is that I'm waiting for a sponsor
since 7 days+ (and not only me, in mentors.debian.net there are 20+
pending packages) [3]. Why are they in pending status and nobody wants
to
Hello,
Il giorno mer, 09/06/2010 alle 22.44 +, Sune Vuorela ha scritto:
When I'm sponsoring packages, which happens from time to time, it is
normally packages that I somehow have a interest in.
I think that many other sponsors feel it the same way.
Sure and I'm agree about that.
For
Il giorno mer, 09/06/2010 alle 18.12 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ha
scritto:
I don't think you are going to get a lot of traction for any proposal that
removes a DD from the upload process.
So, lack of free DDs will always be a potential issue. I suggest you
encourage people to become a
Hello,
Il giorno gio, 10/06/2010 alle 09.31 +1000, Craig Small ha scritto:
That's exactly how I work when sponsoring packages. I look after 7 of
them and all 7 have a reason for being there. There is only 9 packages
that are asking for sponsors.
Whereas for me that would be my worst
Firstly, 7 days is a very short period of time to be waiting for
sponsorship, some have been waiting since 2006.
About your two packages:
autotrash: sounds like the functionality should be part of GNOME/KDE,
please talk to upstream about moving it there.
ardentryst: seems like a good fit for
27 matches
Mail list logo
