* Richard Laager [200129 19:05]:
> On 1/29/20 8:28 AM, Marvin Renich wrote:
> There are plenty of shades of
> grey in this, and what counts as "minimal", "medium", or "massive" is
> going to be at least somewhat subjective.
Completely agree.
> I'd say that "massive breakage" (breaking lots of
[ Note: I have reordered the quoted text blocks. ]
On 1/29/20 8:28 AM, Marvin Renich wrote:
> On the other hand, I do agree with using unstable and testing to
> determine the level of disruption, on the condition that there is a
> _commitment_ to removing the feature before stable release if the
I have no opinion about this specific feature; at first glance it looks
like it might be a reasonable thing to do. On the other hand, I
strongly disagree with this statement as a general rule:
> Unless massive breakage is expected, the default should
> be the most secure option.
This is the
3 matches
Mail list logo
