Hi josch,
On Tue, 06 Aug 2019 20:11:07 +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Quoting Stephen Kitt (2019-08-06 18:43:24)
> > Could we avoid (some of) this by treating “source” as a new architecture?
> > There would be a mostly do-nothing buildd which would repack the source
> > package as a binary
Hi,
Quoting Stephen Kitt (2019-08-06 18:43:24)
> > recently there was some discussion about this in #debian-apt. I don't have
> > the logs of that discussion so others might want to expand on what I
> > remember from back then. In no particular order plus my own thoughts.
> >
> > apt developers
On Sun, 28 Jul 2019 16:33:21 +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Quoting Mo Zhou (2019-07-28 16:03:43)
> > On 2019-07-28 13:13, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > This is maybe not directly helpful to you right now, but:
> > >
> > > If we could build-depend on source packages, you could combine these
> > >
On 28/07/2019 20:32, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 10:04 PM Mo Zhou wrote:
>
>> Is such demand common enough among developers?
>
> There are several ways this would be useful:
> To replace all out-of-tree Linux kernel module -source packages, so
> that dkms/etc doesn't need a
Johannes Schauer writes ("Re: B-D on src package? (was: Re: Challenge from
Julia's non-standard vendored openblas"64_""):
> We have to think about a good syntax for the Build-Depends field
> which is able to express a build dependency on source packages
> unp
On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 10:33 PM Johannes Schauer wrote:
> If we choose the "src:" prefix to pick source instead of binary packages, then
> it's important that we don't have any binary packages called "src" and no
> source packages with a name equal to a valid debian architecture.
Could we have
On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 10:04 PM Mo Zhou wrote:
> Is such demand common enough among developers?
There are several ways this would be useful:
To replace all librust-*-dev and golang-*-dev packages (they contain
source code).
To replace all toolchain -source packages, so that cross-compiling
Mo Zhou 于 2019年7月28日周日 16:03写道：
> On 2019-07-28 13:13, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > This is maybe not directly helpful to you right now, but:
> >
> > If we could build-depend on source packages, you could combine these
> > two ideas into something that might be less awful.
>
> More than once have I
Hi,
Quoting Mo Zhou (2019-07-28 16:03:43)
> On 2019-07-28 13:13, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > This is maybe not directly helpful to you right now, but:
> >
> > If we could build-depend on source packages, you could combine these
> > two ideas into something that might be less awful.
> More than once
On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 07:03:43AM -0700, Mo Zhou wrote:
> > This is maybe not directly helpful to you right now, but:
> >
> > If we could build-depend on source packages, you could combine these
> > two ideas into something that might be less awful.
>
> More than once have I thought of "what if
On 2019-07-28 13:13, Ian Jackson wrote:
> This is maybe not directly helpful to you right now, but:
>
> If we could build-depend on source packages, you could combine these
> two ideas into something that might be less awful.
More than once have I thought of "what if I can B-D on a source
11 matches
Mail list logo
