On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 04:20:25AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 01:32:07PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
That depends on what you mean by a multiarch Blu-ray image. The
inherent nastiness of the HFS hybrid code means that we probably won't
be able to produce BD images
Goswin wrote:
Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl writes:
Overview of available CD/DVD/Blu-ray images for Lenny
-
Architecture-specific images:
* businesscard CD
* network install (netinst) CD
* full CD (650MB) images, users can now choose
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 01:32:07PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
That depends on what you mean by a multiarch Blu-ray image. The
inherent nastiness of the HFS hybrid code means that we probably won't
be able to produce BD images including powerpc at all. BD boot code is
identical to that on CD
Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl writes:
Overview of available CD/DVD/Blu-ray images for Lenny
-
Architecture-specific images:
* businesscard CD
* network install (netinst) CD
* full CD (650MB) images, users can now choose between:
-
Frans Pop wrote:
The Debian CD team has made practical use of the extra time allowed for
the release of Lenny by implementing some late improvements of the CD and
DVD images available for Lenny
[snip]
Thanks for massive work!
--
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID:
On Wednesday 15 October 2008, Steve McIntyre wrote:
* Full CD sets for all architectures:
+ i386, amd64 and source will all be available for download as ISO,
torrent and jigdo
+ for powerpc we will create ISOs/torrents for the first 8 CDs
only (with the rest as jigdo)
+
Eduard Block wrote:
#include hallo.h
* Steve McIntyre [Wed, Dec 20 2006, 06:29:04PM]:
Gnome vs. KDE vs. XFCE
==
The KDE and XFCE variants of CD#1 are now being produced to give more
choice to people for initial installation. By default, CD#1 has always
meant to be
#include hallo.h
* Steve McIntyre [Wed, Dec 20 2006, 06:29:04PM]:
Gnome vs. KDE vs. XFCE
==
The KDE and XFCE variants of CD#1 are now being produced to give more
choice to people for initial installation. By default, CD#1 has always
meant to be enough to install a
Steve McIntyre wrote:
[snip]
mips
jealously scribbles all over the first 512 bytes
I figure that's a DVH Disk Volume Header as used on SGI machines.
mipsel
==
bytes 000-008 : 0-padding
008-011 : magic header
012-015 : boot mode
016-019 : load address
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 08:32:28PM +, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
Steve McIntyre wrote:
[snip]
mips
jealously scribbles all over the first 512 bytes
I figure that's a DVH Disk Volume Header as used on SGI machines.
Yup, exactly. I borrowed the layout from your own genisovh
program... :-)
Note that the XFCE CD originally announced in the head of this thread is
actually working now.
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-xfce-CD-1.iso
It won't install xdm though.. that will probably be fixed in time for
next week's build, along with
Steve McIntyre dijo [Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 03:04:54PM +]:
Bad news I'm afraid. I've worked through the mkisofs boot code again,
and I get:
(...)
I'm looking further to see if it's at all possible to get (e.g.) hppa
and alpha to live in the same boot sector, but it's really not likely.
I
[ Please follow the Reply-To: and head over to debian-cd if you want
to discuss this further... ]
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 03:04:54PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Bad news I'm afraid. I've worked through the mkisofs boot code again,
and I get:
alpha:Writing alpha boot descriptor at extent
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 12:57:44PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Steve McIntyre dijo [Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 03:04:54PM +]:
Bad news I'm afraid. I've worked through the mkisofs boot code again,
and I get:
(...)
I'm looking further to see if it's at all possible to get (e.g.) hppa
and alpha to
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 06:29:04PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
I'm still expecting to add Live CDs to the list here before we
release. Otherwise, I think we're about set. If there's anything else
you'd like us to do or anything you'd like to ask about, please reply
to this mail - note the
Hi,
On Friday 22 December 2006 11:07, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
I'm not sure if this is done (I assume it's not) but I would really like
the DVDs / CDs to have a 'documentation media' which could be used to read
documentation without having to install the system.
I like the idea.
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 01:21:01PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Friday 22 December 2006 11:07, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
I'm not sure if this is done (I assume it's not) but I would really like
the DVDs / CDs to have a 'documentation media' which could be used to read
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 05:33:18PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 03:43:55PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
I'm sure they're, so can't we go for a new multiarch containing hppa
and ia64 only or even i386, hppa and ia64 ?
Hmm, keeping i386 on it is an interesting idea. Or it
On 12/20/06, Steve McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(...)
Gnome vs. KDE vs. XFCE
==
The KDE and XFCE variants of CD#1 are now being produced to give more
choice to people for initial installation. By default, CD#1 has always
meant to be enough to install a
I hope its not too inappropriate to post this message on this group, I
am not a developer but I subscribed to this group a long time ago just
to keep in touch with what was happening with Debian
I just want to say thank you so much for this fantastic system :
Etch/Testing It works so fine on
Gustavo Franco wrote:
Unfortunately, even the GNOME desktop environment doesn't fit on the
CD#1.
True, but enough does fit to have a basically useable gnome desktop.
You will need broadband connection to fetch some more packages
or use the full DVD#1 for your architecture. The bonus is that
On 12/20/06, Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gustavo Franco wrote:
Unfortunately, even the GNOME desktop environment doesn't fit on the
CD#1.
True, but enough does fit to have a basically useable gnome desktop.
Right, but we need to make it clear for the users and the first line
of them
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 05:04:28PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
Let me thanks the debian-desktop, debian-installer and tasksel team
too. Without them, that stuff would be useless.
Yup, of course. :-)
I would like to clarify that debian-desktop (alioth, svn, mailing
list) is now a unit composed
On 12/20/06, Steve McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 05:04:28PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
(...)
In case it's not obvious, the 3 arches picked for these discs are
simply the most common end-user systems out there. There is scope for
producing more multi-arch discs, but
Gustavo Franco wrote:
Do you know what's broken in Xfce cd? Is it tasksel related? I hope not.
Missing task file, it should be fixed in the next build.
Sounds great, could you give me a link with the log or check it in the
next build please?
I checked the log, the current muti dvd doesn't
Le mercredi 20 décembre 2006 à 14:21 -0500, Joey Hess a écrit :
Gustavo Franco wrote:
Unfortunately, even the GNOME desktop environment doesn't fit on the
CD#1.
True, but enough does fit to have a basically useable gnome desktop.
Are you talking of gnome-core or gnome-desktop-environment?
Josselin Mouette wrote:
Are you talking of gnome-core or gnome-desktop-environment? gnome-core
is indeed really basic, but g-d-e already includes a complete desktop.
gnome-desktop-environment is the sole key package in the gnome-desktop
task, and nearly the only one from that task that
Le mercredi 20 décembre 2006 à 16:03 -0500, Joey Hess a écrit :
Not having gnome on a single CD is understandable given how much we've
bloated this metapackage.
Actually, we don't even include the gnome metapackage in the full
gnome-desktop task. gnome-office, gdm-themes and
Josselin Mouette wrote:
It's somewhat a shame not to have gnome-office, or at least gimp,
inkscape and gnumeric, which are by many points superior to other
alternatives.
We do have gimp in the desktop task. I'm willing to consider gnumeric
and inkscape. Actually I wouldn't really mind
Le mercredi 20 décembre 2006 à 16:27 -0500, Joey Hess a écrit :
Josselin Mouette wrote:
It's somewhat a shame not to have gnome-office, or at least gimp,
inkscape and gnumeric, which are by many points superior to other
alternatives.
We do have gimp in the desktop task. I'm willing to
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 03:43:55PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
I'm sure they're, so can't we go for a new multiarch containing hppa
and ia64 only or even i386, hppa and ia64 ?
Hmm, keeping i386 on it is an interesting idea. Or it could have alpha,
hppa, and ia64, for the big/old/weird/64 bit
Joey Hess wrote:
I checked the log, the current muti dvd doesn't seem to have any desktop
packages on it, not even gnome-desktop-environment.
Wrong log as it turns out. The gnome task is there, in full, as are
almost all other tasks, except for a few of the last language tasks. The
kde task
32 matches
Mail list logo
