On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 10:11:32AM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
As Robert Millan brought to my attention, in my enthusiasm to present
our progress towards fully Lenny support for the Eee in the best
possible light, my announcement muddied the distinction between Lenny
and non-free when I said
Dear maintainers,
you wwrote
As Robert Millan brought to my attention, in my enthusiasm to present
our progress towards fully Lenny support for the Eee in the best
possible light, my announcement muddied the distinction between Lenny
and non-free when I said that the earliest Eee models are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
re all,
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 06:36:14PM +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
Eh, yes, but kernel-module ath5k is still buggy (Bug #1542: cannot
get an IP with dhcp) now for almost half a year - and no one seem to
care.
i can confirm this is no
Am Dienstag, 5. August 2008 schrieb jaromil:
re all,
Hi jaromil,
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 06:36:14PM +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
Eh, yes, but kernel-module ath5k is still buggy (Bug #1542: cannot
get an IP with dhcp) now for almost half a year - and no one seem to
care.
i can confirm
Robert Millan wrote:
[ adding debian-project ]
On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 01:53:54PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 08:28:19AM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
Earliest Eee models fully supported in Lenny
Lenny will release with the atl2 ethernet driver and the non-free
On Sun, 3 Aug 2008, Ben Armstrong wrote:
On Sun, 3 Aug 2008 13:53:54 +0200
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lenny is Debian. non-free is not part of Debian. Check the Social Contract.
In light of the point of that follows this one, is it perhaps not too
far of a stretch to imagine
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 03:18:24PM +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
: Origin: Debian
: Label: Debian
: Suite: testing
: Codename: lenny
: Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 08:39:59 UTC
: Architectures: alpha amd64 arm armel hppa i386 ia64 mips mipsel
powerpc s390 sparc
: Components: main contrib
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 20:36:17 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
This is troubling. Do you have any suggestions on how to address this?
Stop trolling about utterly uninteresting details?
HTH,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 08:46:36PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 20:36:17 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
This is troubling. Do you have any suggestions on how to address this?
Stop trolling about utterly uninteresting details?
I think it's you who are trolling.
--
Robert Millan wrote:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 03:18:24PM +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
: Origin: Debian
: Label: Debian
: Suite: testing
: Codename: lenny
: Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 08:39:59 UTC
: Architectures: alpha amd64 arm armel hppa i386 ia64 mips mipsel
powerpc s390 sparc
:
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Therefore Lenny is not Debian, but a superset of it?
This is troubling. Do you have any suggestions on how to address this?
I recommend not attributing such judgements to the configuration files of
software packages.
I'm looking for review of
Russ Allbery wrote:
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Therefore Lenny is not Debian, but a superset of it?
This is troubling. Do you have any suggestions on how to address this?
I recommend not attributing such judgements to the configuration files of
software packages.
Sorry???
Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Russ Allbery wrote:
I recommend not attributing such judgements to the configuration files
of software packages.
Sorry???
It is more that a configuration file, and BTW the same notation it is
also used by apt. Archive and its format are an area
On Aug 05, Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I disagree. The Release file in the archive is a configuration file that
is part of the software interface to the archive. The terminology that it
uses refers to capabilities within the archive maintenance software and
within the software
On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 08:28:19AM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
Earliest Eee models fully supported in Lenny
Lenny will release with the atl2 ethernet driver and the non-free
madwifi-source now works with the earliest Eee models as well,
Hi Ben
Lenny is Debian. non-free is not part
On Sun, 3 Aug 2008 13:53:54 +0200
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lenny is Debian. non-free is not part of Debian. Check the Social Contract.
In light of the point of that follows this one, is it perhaps not too
far of a stretch to imagine that I understand this, and expected my
readers
[ adding debian-project ]
On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 01:53:54PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 08:28:19AM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
Earliest Eee models fully supported in Lenny
Lenny will release with the atl2 ethernet driver and the non-free
madwifi-source
On Sun, 3 Aug 2008 14:17:46 +0200
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder what is it that we do wrong to spread this confusion so much that it
affects even Debian developers themselves.
What is this to blame? Would it be the FTP archive layout? Perhaps having an
unified BTS?
I'd
As Robert Millan brought to my attention, in my enthusiasm to present
our progress towards fully Lenny support for the Eee in the best
possible light, my announcement muddied the distinction between Lenny
and non-free when I said that the earliest Eee models are now fully
supported in Lenny. I
Ben Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Earliest Eee models supported in Lenny
Lenny will release with the atl2 ethernet driver and the non-free
madwifi-source now works with the earliest Eee models as well
[…]
Sorry for the confusion,
Thanks very much for correcting this important
20 matches
Mail list logo
