Re: Bits from the NM people

2010-02-16 Thread Brian Ryans
Quoting Jan Dittberner on 2010-02-13 12:19:06: There are surely more ways to show activity even without uploading packages or doing other packaging work. Hear, hear. From what I've seen, packaging seems to be the 'sexiest' role a DM/DD could take on, and the most visible role. But what would a

Re: Bits from the NM people

2010-02-13 Thread Jan Dittberner
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 12:49:31AM +0100, Andreas Marschke wrote: On Monday 30 November 2009 00:08:20 Joerg Jaspert wrote: Lets say this package is maintained on Launchpad that also maintainance for debian or would this have to be on mentors.debian.org to be a valid maintainance? (Just

Re: Bits from the NM people

2009-11-30 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Ralf Treinen wrote: the main resource is a psql database with offers and requests, and the gpg coordination web pages are mainly interfacing to these web pages. Did you actually look at how gpg coordination works? I know the code *puke* and the database very well, thanks. And I still can't

Re: Bits from the NM people

2009-11-29 Thread Nuno Paquete
Very good news for people like me that want to be part of the best team in the worl. I'm reading a lot this days, preparing myself to help the best as I can the magnific Debian community. My goal is to be a DD some day. Step by step!! Cheers, Nuno Paquete On Nov 29, 2009 1:27 PM, Joerg Jaspert

Re: Bits from the NM people

2009-11-29 Thread Andreas Marschke
As such, we prefer that people who want to apply to NM have been active in Debian for a while already, and have built up some experience. In the last few months, we've already redirected some people to the DM process when we felt that they were not ready to become a DD yet, and we will

Re: Bits from the NM people

2009-11-29 Thread Patrick Schoenfeld
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 06:55:58PM +0100, Andreas Marschke wrote: As such, we prefer that people who want to apply to NM have been active in Debian for a while already, and have built up some experience. In the last few months, we've already redirected some people to the DM process when we

Re: Bits from the NM people

2009-11-29 Thread Andreas Marschke
On Sunday 29 November 2009 19:54:02 Patrick Schoenfeld wrote: On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 06:55:58PM +0100, Andreas Marschke wrote: As such, we prefer that people who want to apply to NM have been active in Debian for a while already, and have built up some experience. In the last few

Re: Bits from the NM people

2009-11-29 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 20:21:02 +0100, Andreas Marschke wrote: Lets say this package is maintained on Launchpad that also maintainance for debian or would this have to be on mentors.debian.org to be a valid maintainance? (Just curios as there use to be some discussion between the bloggers

Re: Bits from the NM people

2009-11-29 Thread The Fungi
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 08:21:02PM +0100, Andreas Marschke wrote: Lets say this package is maintained on Launchpad that also maintainance for debian or would this have to be on mentors.debian.org to be a valid maintainance? (Just curios as there use to be some discussion between the bloggers

Re: Bits from the NM people

2009-11-29 Thread Ralf Treinen
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 02:26:55PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: GPG keysigning coordination --- FD/DAM would like to to move the GPG keysiging coordination over to someone else. It's not really part of FrontDesk work; and as we are rewriting the webpage anyhow we

Re: Bits from the NM people

2009-11-29 Thread Joerg Jaspert
Lets say this package is maintained on Launchpad that also maintainance for debian or would this have to be on mentors.debian.org to be a valid maintainance? (Just curios as there use to be some discussion between the bloggers about that some time back) Where it is maintained is

Re: Bits from the NM people

2009-11-29 Thread Andreas Marschke
On Monday 30 November 2009 00:08:20 Joerg Jaspert wrote: Lets say this package is maintained on Launchpad that also maintainance for debian or would this have to be on mentors.debian.org to be a valid maintainance? (Just curios as there use to be some discussion between the bloggers about

Re: Bits from the NM people

2009-11-29 Thread Ryan Niebur
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 12:49:31AM +0100, Andreas Marschke wrote: On Monday 30 November 2009 00:08:20 Joerg Jaspert wrote: Lets say this package is maintained on Launchpad that also maintainance for debian or would this have to be on mentors.debian.org to be a valid maintainance? (Just

Re: Bits from the NM people

2009-11-29 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Ralf Treinen wrote: GPG keysigning coordination is since a long time done by a small group of people independendent from FrontDesk. Currently this is basically me, with an offer from Patrick Schoenfeld to help. In the past tbm and Luk have been part of that team. I agree that the

Re: Bits from the NM people

2009-11-29 Thread Jeremy T. Bouse
Bernd Zeimetz wrote: Ralf Treinen wrote: GPG keysigning coordination is since a long time done by a small group of people independendent from FrontDesk. Currently this is basically me, with an offer from Patrick Schoenfeld to help. In the past tbm and Luk have been part of that team. I

Re: Bits from the NM people

2009-11-29 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Jeremy T. Bouse jbo...@debian.org (29/11/2009): There is already https://nm.debian.org/gpg.php that people should be pointed to as a good starting place. Did you actually read the thread? (Either one more mail than the one you replied to; or only that one, but including the quoted message in

Re: Bits from the NM people

2009-11-29 Thread Ralf Treinen
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 01:22:09AM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: Ralf Treinen wrote: GPG keysigning coordination is since a long time done by a small group of people independendent from FrontDesk. Currently this is basically me, with an offer from Patrick Schoenfeld to help. In the past

Re: Bits from the NM people

2009-11-29 Thread Raphael Geissert
Ralf Treinen wrote: I agree that the infrastructure could (and should) be independent of the rest of nm. Which doesn't mean that I volunteer to implement it ... I could probably help implementing a basic system, but I don't know if it wouldn't be easier to use a ticket-based system so that