On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 07:31:42PM +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
We would like to know what needs attention, what bugs still need to be
fixed in your package before squeeze is released, which features or new
upstream versions you want to see in squeeze which are not ready yet.
Furthermore
Le samedi 20 mars 2010 à 14:23 +0300, Stanislav Maslovski a écrit :
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 07:31:42PM +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
We would like to know what needs attention, what bugs still need to be
fixed in your package before squeeze is released, which features or new
upstream
On mer., 2010-03-17 at 19:01 +0700, Andrew Lee wrote:
- lxdm 0.1: a simple display manager for LXDE
Which doesn't seem to be in Debian nor in NEW at the moment. Won't that
be a bit short?
Cheers,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Following Yves-Alexis to update the status on LXDE team. :)
As we are just initialing to build a LXDE team for related packages. I
expected we would make these works done faster and more smoothly.
The lxsession 0.4.2 is pending for upload as lxsession 0.4.1 is still in
sid and blocked
From a current point of view squeeze will release with kernel 2.6.32
This is not very good, since .32 is skipped by -rt people, so us who need
realtime kernel, won't be able just to add a patch to distribution kernel,
but instead will have to use different upstream version.
--
To
Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
From a current point of view squeeze will release with kernel 2.6.32
This is not very good, since .32 is skipped by -rt people, so us who need
realtime kernel, won't be able just to add a patch to distribution
kernel, but instead will have to use different
Hello,
Le dimanche 14 mars 2010 à 21:42 +0100, Philipp Kern a écrit :
Dear fellow developers,
We would like to know what needs attention, what bugs still need to be
fixed in your package before squeeze is released, which features or new
upstream versions you want to see in squeeze which
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 21:42, Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote:
From a current point of view squeeze will release with kernel 2.6.32
Would it be possible to, instead, release with kernel 2.6.33?
I see at least two improvements from 2.6.32 to 2.6.33 that will matter
a lot to certain subsets
Hi,
On Sun Mar 14, 2010 at 21:57:49 +0100, Mikael Djurfeldt wrote:
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 21:42, Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote:
From a current point of view squeeze will release with kernel 2.6.32
Would it be possible to, instead, release with kernel 2.6.33?
I see at least two
From a current point of view squeeze will release with kernel 2.6.32
Would it be possible to, instead, release with kernel 2.6.33?
Thats a kernel team decision. And they have .32, as that is (IIRC)
supported not only by Debian but by many other distributions too.
(and at some point you just
On Sun, 2010-03-14 at 21:57 +0100, Mikael Djurfeldt wrote:
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 21:42, Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote:
From a current point of view squeeze will release with kernel 2.6.32
Would it be possible to, instead, release with kernel 2.6.33?
Not a chance.
I see at least
On dim., 2010-03-14 at 21:42 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
Dear fellow developers,
[…]
It would be great if every team on track could send us a short mail to
debian-rele...@lists.debian.org and if every team that still faces work
could write up a corresponding bug report filed against
12 matches
Mail list logo
