Hi,
I'm bcc'ing this email to maintainers of the list of packages, below.
Each of you, I'd appreciate it if you could check with the upstream
authors whether a fix is already available. Please send an update
to the appropriate bug with the upstream response or mark the bug
forwarded to the
Steve M. Robbins steve at sumost.ca writes:
OK, with thanks to Lucas Nussbaum for the build results, I can report
that only the following 23 of 237 boost rdep packages failed to build
with boost-defaults pointing to 1.48. This shouldn't take a lot of
Hrm, I don’t see aptitude in there, but
On 28/12/11 at 13:50 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Steve M. Robbins steve at sumost.ca writes:
OK, with thanks to Lucas Nussbaum for the build results, I can report
that only the following 23 of 237 boost rdep packages failed to build
with boost-defaults pointing to 1.48. This shouldn't
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 12:47:34PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
But what worries me more is that you AGAIN ignored
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=652681.
I was working off a rebuild of SID. Perhaps my last message didn't
clearly state that. So all the bugs reported were
On 26/12/11 at 22:40 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
Hello,
The latest Boost (1.48) is now in testing, and I'd like to switch the
defaults. My first plan was to simply announce the switch then make
it. I did so and got an immediate email from the release team
asking to revert the default
Hi!
On Tue Dec 27, 2011 10:42:07AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
I'd like to point out that any resulting build failures are quite easy
to fix: either
(a) contact package upstream for boost 1.48 changes; or
It is? #652681 doesn't look like it.
Will 1.46 be around long enough that
Hi,
I'd like to point out that any resulting build failures are quite easy
to fix: either
(a) contact package upstream for boost 1.48 changes; or
It is? #652681 doesn't look like it.
Will 1.46 be around long enough that reverting to 1.46 is an option there?
The wheezy release should be with
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 10:42:07AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to point out that any resulting build failures are quite easy
to fix: either
(a) contact package upstream for boost 1.48 changes; or
It is? #652681 doesn't look like it.
I'll just note that an Internal
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 04:45:21PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 26/12/11 at 22:40 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
It would be quite helpful to do a rebuild of the 237 boost reverse
dependencies. Lucas Nussbaum seems to be able to do this: can you run
a rebuild with updated
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 11:28:14AM +0100, Thomas Krennwallner wrote:
As long as something depends on 1.46, I assume that it should be
around. The current situation is sub-optimal, because almost everything
depends on the non-versioned boost libs of boost-defaults, despite
boost's tendency to
On Tue, 2011-12-27 at 10:52 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 10:42:07AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Will 1.46 be around long enough that reverting to 1.46 is an option there?
Absolutely, 1.46 is an option. That's why I suggested it. Debian has
been releasing with at
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 06:32:16PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2011-12-27 at 10:52 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 10:42:07AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Will 1.46 be around long enough that reverting to 1.46 is an option there?
Absolutely, 1.46 is an
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 11:20:16AM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 04:45:21PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 26/12/11 at 22:40 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
It would be quite helpful to do a rebuild of the 237 boost reverse
dependencies. Lucas Nussbaum seems to
On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 11:20:16 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
Note that I am starting from scratch. I know how to use pbuilder and
how to manually download and build a package. At my present rate of
1-2 per week, it would take me several years to rebuild them all
locally.
Are there scripts
Hello,
The latest Boost (1.48) is now in testing, and I'd like to switch the
defaults. My first plan was to simply announce the switch then make
it. I did so and got an immediate email from the release team
asking to revert the default change, which I did.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 08:00:15PM
15 matches
Mail list logo
