On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 09:02:11PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 20:42:07 +0100
Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
britney only considers installability, not buildability.
Maybe it should - after all, in the phase prior to a release, the
I'm not sure whether britney
On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 20:25:12 +0200
Norbert Tretkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From #501423: FTBFS in lenny: Unsatisfiable build-dependency:
libloudmouth1-dev(inst 1.4.0-1 ! = wanted 1.4.1)
Am Dienstag, den 07.10.2008, 18:57 +0100 schrieb Neil Williams:
Migration to testing happens
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 20:21 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
$ rmadison libloudmouth1-0
libloudmouth1-0 |1.4.0-1 | testing | alpha, amd64, arm,
armel, hppa, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
libloudmouth1-0 |1.4.2-1 | unstable | alpha, amd64, arm,
armel, hppa,
On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 20:42:07 +0100
Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 20:21 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
$ rmadison libloudmouth1-0
libloudmouth1-0 |1.4.0-1 | testing | alpha, amd64, arm,
armel, hppa, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390,
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 21:02:11 +0100
Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
britney only considers installability, not buildability.
Maybe it should - after all, in the phase prior to a release, the
ability to build the entire release from source *is* important. To me,
this is precisely what
Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm assuming there are records of unblocks beyond the mailing list
archive?
The release team's hint files are available:
http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/
In this case:
testing/hints/luk:unblock gossip/1:0.31-1
We move hints that were done
Neil Williams wrote:
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 21:02:11 +0100
Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
britney only considers installability, not buildability.
Maybe it should - after all, in the phase prior to a release, the
ability to build the entire release from source *is* important. To me,
Le mardi 07 octobre 2008 à 17:13 -0400, Felipe Sateler a écrit :
Wasn't dpkg supposed to use max(shlibs, build-depends)? The rationale, IIRC,
is
because a particular program might rely on a specific bugfix in a given
version
of the library. Since bugfixes don't cause shlibs bumps, this was
8 matches
Mail list logo