* Adam Heath
| The above makes it easy to exclude whole heiarachies, ie, /usr/share/doc.
So will the filetype part of how Scott James is doing stuff.
| It can also be used to alter /lib to /lib64 or /lib32, on the fly, during
| install.
You can't do that in a sane way anyhow. (Think libtool
Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Adam Heath
| The above makes it easy to exclude whole heiarachies, ie, /usr/share/doc.
So will the filetype part of how Scott James is doing stuff.
| It can also be used to alter /lib to /lib64 or /lib32, on the fly, during
| install.
You
also sprach Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.12.11.0259 +0100]:
Well, the plan is to make the dpkg-deb interface more formalized. What I
mean, is being able to use it in a filter, with plugging input and output.
Thanks for the explanation. Yes, this is the sensible to do it.
Repacking and
Adam Heath wrote:
Well, the plan is to make the dpkg-deb interface more formalized. What I
mean, is being able to use it in a filter, with plugging input and output.
Ie, multiple input methods: .deb, .rpm, filesystem
filter mode: standard tar output
output mode: filesystem, .deb, .rpm
Repacking
On Sat, 2004-12-11 at 21:51 +0200, Ognyan Kulev wrote:
Adam Heath wrote:
Well, the plan is to make the dpkg-deb interface more formalized. What I
mean, is being able to use it in a filter, with plugging input and output.
Ie, multiple input methods: .deb, .rpm, filesystem
filter
Scott James Remnant [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, 2004-12-11 at 21:51 +0200, Ognyan Kulev wrote:
Adam Heath wrote:
Well, the plan is to make the dpkg-deb interface more formalized. What I
mean, is being able to use it in a filter, with plugging input and output.
Ie, multiple
On Sat, 11 Dec 2004, Ognyan Kulev wrote:
Adam Heath wrote:
Well, the plan is to make the dpkg-deb interface more formalized. What I
mean, is being able to use it in a filter, with plugging input and output.
Ie, multiple input methods: .deb, .rpm, filesystem
filter mode: standard tar
On Sat, 11 Dec 2004, Scott James Remnant wrote:
On Sat, 2004-12-11 at 21:51 +0200, Ognyan Kulev wrote:
Adam Heath wrote:
Well, the plan is to make the dpkg-deb interface more formalized. What I
mean, is being able to use it in a filter, with plugging input and output.
Ie,
Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, 11 Dec 2004, Scott James Remnant wrote:
On Sat, 2004-12-11 at 21:51 +0200, Ognyan Kulev wrote:
Adam Heath wrote:
Well, the plan is to make the dpkg-deb interface more formalized. What I
mean, is being able to use it in a filter, with
also sprach Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.12.09.2053 +0100]:
Probably yes on dpkg-repack. Definately not for dpkg-www. Which
is a sucky name, btw.
Agreed. However, if dpkg-repack goes into dpkg, why not provide
a means to edit a DEB file (without having to install it) too?
--
Please do
On Thu, 9 Dec 2004, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.12.09.2053 +0100]:
Probably yes on dpkg-repack. Definately not for dpkg-www. Which
is a sucky name, btw.
Agreed. However, if dpkg-repack goes into dpkg, why not provide
a means to edit a DEB file
* martin f krafft
| also sprach Scott James Remnant [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.12.08.0909 +0100]:
| Generally the dpkg-* namespace is reserved for features that are
| intended for integration into dpkg at some point.
|
| well, by all means then. If dpkg-repack and dpkg-www are intended
| for
also sprach Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.12.09.1351 +0100]:
| I really think reversion should be available.
I think it's useless,
it's not.
I will probably rename it to debedit.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Scott James Remnant [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.12.08.0909 +0100]:
Generally the dpkg-* namespace is reserved for features that are
intended for integration into dpkg at some point.
well, by all means then. If dpkg-repack and dpkg-www are
On Tue, 2004-12-07 at 18:13 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
I needed a tool to change the version number of DEB files after
repacking them with dpkg-repack. So I wrote one. Very simple, does
not really warrant its own package, but devscripts is also not
really the place for it. It is unlikely
also sprach Scott James Remnant [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.12.08.0909 +0100]:
Generally the dpkg-* namespace is reserved for features that are
intended for integration into dpkg at some point.
well, by all means then. If dpkg-repack and dpkg-www are intended
for integration into dpkg, then
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: dpkg-reversion
Version : 0.1.5
Upstream Author : martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://madduck.net/~madduck/scratch/dpkg-reversion
* License : Artistic
Description : change the version of a DEB
17 matches
Mail list logo
