also sprach W. Borgert [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.08.20.0119 +0200]:
At least that's not a contradiction in terms :-) No, I really
did not think about chemistry, when I read acid-base.
I am sure the ACID guys did when they choise the name BASE. :)
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me;
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package name: base
Version : 1.1.4
Upstream Author : Kevin Johnson kjohnson_AT_secureideas.net
and the BASE Development Team.
URL :
also sprach Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[2005.08.19.1107 +0200]:
Package name: base
I don't think this is an appropriate name. It is too easy to mix
that up with the Debian base system, or base packages, or
base-config.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 11:32:03AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[2005.08.19.1107 +0200]:
Package name: base
I don't think this is an appropriate name. It is too easy to mix
that up with the Debian base system, or base
also sprach Jon Dowland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.08.19.1747 +0200]:
I suggest base-security-engine, even though it's quite verbose and
the latter two words redundant after the acronym. `base-engine' is
better than just base, but similarly could be mistaken for something
else important.
How
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 05:59:49PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Jon Dowland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.08.19.1747 +0200]:
I suggest base-security-engine, even though it's quite verbose and
the latter two words redundant after the acronym. `base-engine' is
better than just base,
also sprach W. Borgert [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.08.19.2049 +0200]:
How about acid-base?
This sounds less confusing than base-{,security-}engine. For
the latter I would assume an important security package of the
Debian base system or so.
And the next, or a related project, could be called
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 12:05:51AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach W. Borgert [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.08.19.2049 +0200]:
How about acid-base?
This sounds less confusing than base-{,security-}engine. For
the latter I would assume an important security package of the
Debian
8 matches
Mail list logo
