Re: Bug#388701: Why Beryl has just four packages?

2007-04-24 Thread Alok G. Singh
On 24 Apr 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What don't you put a personal server while we wait for them? or in experimental? (a personal server would be better). If you just want a packaged beryl, the Beryl project have packaged it. deb http://debian.beryl-project.org etch main deb-src

Re: Bug#388701: Why Beryl has just four packages?

2007-04-23 Thread Shawn Starr
] To: Shawn Starr [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Anibal Avelar [EMAIL PROTECTED]; debian-devel@lists.debian.org Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2007 5:38:39 AM Subject: Bug#388701: Why Beryl has just four packages? On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:55:30AM -0500, Shawn Starr wrote: On Wednesday 14 February

Re: Bug#388701: Why Beryl has just four packages?

2007-04-23 Thread Anibal Avelar
Hi. On 4/23/07, Shawn Starr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've stopped Beryl for now since they are officially merging with compiz. I need to speak to the compiz maintainer. I know something about this. Do you know is officially? The compiz and beryl teams has problems with this process (was

Re: Bug#388701: Why Beryl has just four packages?

2007-04-23 Thread Andrea Bolognani
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:55:47 -0500 Anibal Avelar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If both projects joins but you don't upload them in unstable, but while we can have beryl, I like beryl than compiz due to the beryl-manager ;) I guess beryl-manager will be merged as well (probably renamed). -- KiyuKo

Re: Bug#388701: Why Beryl has just four packages?

2007-04-22 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:55:30AM -0500, Shawn Starr wrote: On Wednesday 14 February 2007 00:27, Anibal Avelar wrote: Hi. I see you have in queue NEW three packages: beryl-plugins, beryl-settings and emerald [1] and not ready (yet) beryl. Firstly, the beryl packages were REJECTED because