Felipe Sateler wrote:
But oldstable has 2.86.ds1-1. I thought that only direct upgrades were
supported. I guess the conditional is indeed redundant.
It may be, but keeping backwards compatibility in this case can't hurt
much. Although I'd like to hear other opinions on this.
--
·''`.
Felipe Sateler wrote:
Juan Céspedes wrote:
invoke-rc.d is present since version 2.80-1 of sysvinit; maybe someone
could have a modern package with a very old sysvinit, and thus without
invoke-rc.d
But oldstable has 2.86.ds1-1. I thought that only direct upgrades were
supported. I guess the
Amaya wrote:
In most cases the fix should be simple, replace this:
/etc/init.d/package action
with this:
if which invoke-rc.d /dev/null 21; then
invoke-rc.d package action
else
/etc/init.d/package action
fi
Hi,
I don't want to be a pest
On 8/24/07, David Claughton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Amaya wrote:
if which invoke-rc.d /dev/null 21; then
invoke-rc.d package action
else
/etc/init.d/package action
fi
I don't want to be a pest (given I'm not a developer or maintainer), but
I'm
Juan Céspedes wrote:
On 8/24/07, David Claughton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Amaya wrote:
if which invoke-rc.d /dev/null 21; then
invoke-rc.d package action
else
/etc/init.d/package action
fi
I don't want to be a pest (given I'm not a developer or
Package: general
Severity: serious
As of Debian Policy Manual version 3.7.2, the use of invoke-rc.d to
run init.d scripts has been made mandatory. Earlier, its use was
strongly recommended.
In most cases the fix should be simple, replace this:
/etc/init.d/package action
with this:
6 matches
Mail list logo
