Re: Bug#491156: ITP: postgresql-8.3-plr -- Procedural language interface between PostgreSQL 8.3 and R

2008-07-17 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Hi Andreas, Andreas Tille wrote: This package was removed from Debian (see #228074, which can not be reopened because it is archived). The reason that it is RC buggy) is void because #461995 took me 1 Minute to fix (well, you can blame me for not having this done before the removal - the

Re: Bug#491156: ITP: postgresql-8.3-plr -- Procedural language interface between PostgreSQL 8.3 and R

2008-07-17 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008, Thomas Viehmann wrote: The package was removed after noone was interested in maintaining it for four(!) years. Huh? plr (1:8.2.0.7-2) unstable; urgency=low * Orphan package (see #228074). -- Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:38:42 +0100 That's

Re: Bug#491156: ITP: postgresql-8.3-plr -- Procedural language interface between PostgreSQL 8.3 and R

2008-07-17 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Andreas Tille wrote: On Thu, 17 Jul 2008, Thomas Viehmann wrote: The package was removed after noone was interested in maintaining it for four(!) years. Huh? [...] * Orphan package (see #228074). -- Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:38:42 +0100 That's about 6 month

Re: Bug#491156: ITP: postgresql-8.3-plr -- Procedural language interface between PostgreSQL 8.3 and R

2008-07-17 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008, Adam D. Barratt wrote: #228074 is an RFA for the package, filed in January 2004 and with no sign of any interest. Well, we might start nitpicking about the past whether an RFAed package that is actively updated by its mainteiner is interest in maintenance or not. I'd

Re: Bug#491156: ITP: postgresql-8.3-plr -- Procedural language interface between PostgreSQL 8.3 and R

2008-07-17 Thread Adeodato Simó
Andreas Tille wrote: (see #228074, which can not be reopened because it is archived). Bugs can be unarchived, and then reopened now. -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org Man is