* Jonny Lamb [Sat, 14 Feb 2009 18:03:51 +]:
On Sat, Feb 14, 16:25:41 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
Do you have binary packages anywhere? I'd like to give it a try without
having to compile it.
Sure. I threw some i386 and amd64 packages here:
http://people.debian.org/~jonny/gitg/
Hi,
could it be that there is some limitation in the number of
files/directories? It only shows 80 directories here in the tree view,
but 173 are present.
Regards,
Tino
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Tino Keitel tino.kei...@tikei.de (16/02/2009):
could it be that there is some limitation in the number of
files/directories? It only shows 80 directories here in the tree
view, but 173 are present.
Maybe a bunch of them are empty, which means they are of no interest
from a git point of view?
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 20:02:09 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Tino Keitel tino.kei...@tikei.de (16/02/2009):
could it be that there is some limitation in the number of
files/directories? It only shows 80 directories here in the tree
view, but 173 are present.
Maybe a bunch of them are
]] Dmitrijs Ledkovs
| 2009/2/15 Gunnar Wolf gw...@gwolf.org
|
| Tollef Fog Heen dijo [Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 06:42:37PM +0100]:
| | when i've had to do this in the past i think i did something like
| | vers~MMDD.git.sha. this way you get lots of relevant info,
the
| | fact that it's
On Sat, 2009-02-14 at 15:34 +0100, sean finney wrote:
hiya,
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 11:20:44AM +0100, David Paleino wrote:
On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 11:17:42 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Jonny Lamb [Fri, 13 Feb 2009 23:41:46 +]:
Version : 0.0.0+git+37ec0c
I
Tollef Fog Heen dijo [Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 06:42:37PM +0100]:
| when i've had to do this in the past i think i did something like
| vers~MMDD.git.sha. this way you get lots of relevant info, the
| fact that it's a prerelease of vers, the date the snapshot was taken,
| the fact that it's a
2009/2/15 Gunnar Wolf gw...@gwolf.org
Tollef Fog Heen dijo [Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 06:42:37PM +0100]:
| when i've had to do this in the past i think i did something like
| vers~MMDD.git.sha. this way you get lots of relevant info, the
| fact that it's a prerelease of vers, the date the
* Jonny Lamb [Fri, 13 Feb 2009 23:41:46 +]:
Version : 0.0.0+git+37ec0c
I don't know what your further plans of versioning are for Git snapshot
(incrementing the micro release number?), but I thought I'd point out
that SHA1 are not sensibly sortable, just in case.
Cheers,
--
On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 11:17:42 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Jonny Lamb [Fri, 13 Feb 2009 23:41:46 +]:
Version : 0.0.0+git+37ec0c
I don't know what your further plans of versioning are for Git snapshot
(incrementing the micro release number?), but I thought I'd point out
hiya,
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 11:20:44AM +0100, David Paleino wrote:
On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 11:17:42 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Jonny Lamb [Fri, 13 Feb 2009 23:41:46 +]:
Version : 0.0.0+git+37ec0c
I don't know what your further plans of versioning are for Git
On Sat, Feb 14, 08:12:45 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
Is it stable enough, even for unstable? :)
I've been using it for a little while and I think so, yes.
--
Jonny Lamb, UK
jo...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Feb 14, 11:17:42 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
I don't know what your further plans of versioning are for Git snapshot
(incrementing the micro release number?), but I thought I'd point out
that SHA1 are not sensibly sortable, just in case.
Right. I suspect some releases will start
* Jonny Lamb [Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:55:42 +]:
On Sat, Feb 14, 08:12:45 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
Is it stable enough, even for unstable? :)
I've been using it for a little while and I think so, yes.
Do you have binary packages anywhere? I'd like to give it a try without
having to
]] sean finney
| when i've had to do this in the past i think i did something like
| vers~MMDD.git.sha. this way you get lots of relevant info, the
| fact that it's a prerelease of vers, the date the snapshot was taken,
| the fact that it's a git snapshot, and the sha sum. and of course
On Sat, Feb 14, 16:25:41 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
Do you have binary packages anywhere? I'd like to give it a try without
having to compile it.
Sure. I threw some i386 and amd64 packages here:
http://people.debian.org/~jonny/gitg/
--
Jonny Lamb, UK
jo...@debian.org
signature.asc
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonny Lamb jo...@debian.org
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: gitg
Version : 0.0.0+git+37ec0c
Upstream Author : Jesse van den Kieboom je...@icecrew.nl
* URL : http://git.gnome.org/cgit/gitg/
* License
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 23:41:46 +, Jonny Lamb wrote:
* Package name: gitg
Version : 0.0.0+git+37ec0c
Is it stable enough, even for unstable? :)
David
--
. ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
: :' : Linuxer
18 matches
Mail list logo
