Re: Bug#550031: ITP: libjs-extjs -- a cross-browser JavaScript library

2009-10-23 Thread Thomas Goirand
Thomas, I discussed this matter with our CEO and he asked me to resolve the compliancy. I iwll update you shortly. ~ Adam Hi Adam, Ok, that sounds good, as I would really hate to push for a package that has some controversy on the freeness of it's license. I am very happy to see that you

Re: Bug#550031: ITP: libjs-extjs -- a cross-browser JavaScript library

2009-10-09 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 12:20:51AM -, Thomas Goirand a écrit : Thomas, It's not my position to get into Debian's debate. I can confirm for you that Ext JS can absolutely be licensed under GPL v3 without qualification. If there is commentary that can be read counter to that, then that

Re: Bug#550031: ITP: libjs-extjs -- a cross-browser JavaScript library

2009-10-09 Thread Neil Williams
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 00:20:51 - (UTC) Thomas Goirand tho...@gplhost.com wrote: It's not my position to get into Debian's debate. I can confirm for you that Ext JS can absolutely be licensed under GPL v3 without qualification. If there is commentary that can be read counter to that, then

Re: Bug#550031: ITP: libjs-extjs -- a cross-browser JavaScript library

2009-10-09 Thread Thomas Goirand
Neil Williams wrote: On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 00:20:51 - (UTC) Thomas Goirand tho...@gplhost.com wrote: It's not my position to get into Debian's debate. I can confirm for you that Ext JS can absolutely be licensed under GPL v3 without qualification. If there is commentary that can be read

Re: Bug#550031: ITP: libjs-extjs -- a cross-browser JavaScript library

2009-10-09 Thread Neil Williams
On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 18:24:55 +0800 Thomas Goirand tho...@goirand.fr wrote: What matters is what is claimed as the licence for the code itself, not how that licence is or is not described on a website. But the license file refers to the website... Here's the main part of its content:

Re: Bug#550031: ITP: libjs-extjs -- a cross-browser JavaScript library

2009-10-08 Thread Thomas Goirand
Thomas, It's not my position to get into Debian's debate. I can confirm for you that Ext JS can absolutely be licensed under GPL v3 without qualification. If there is commentary that can be read counter to that, then that is not a good read of what we are saying. From a legal standpoint,

Bug#550031: ITP: libjs-extjs -- a cross-browser JavaScript library

2009-10-07 Thread Thomas Goirand
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Thomas Goirand tho...@goirand.fr * Package name: libjs-extjs Version : 3.0.0 Upstream Author : Ext JS LLC licens...@extjs.com * URL : http://www.extjs.com/ * License : GPL-3 Programming Lang: Javascript, PHP

Re: Bug#550031: ITP: libjs-extjs -- a cross-browser JavaScript library

2009-10-07 Thread Marcus Better
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thomas Goirand skrev: Surely you are aware of the huge controversy around Ext JS licensing. Hell, I missed it. Oh well :-) This doesn't appear at all on the license.txt. Do you think I could still package it for the non-free archive? I don't

Re: Bug#550031: ITP: libjs-extjs -- a cross-browser JavaScript library

2009-10-07 Thread Thomas Goirand
Marcus Better wrote: This is non-free. Please keep it out of Debian. Surely you are aware of the huge controversy around Ext JS licensing. There is no need to repeat that story here, let me just point to this page: http://www.extjs.com/company/dual.php Here they make claims that

Re: Bug#550031: ITP: libjs-extjs -- a cross-browser JavaScript library

2009-10-07 Thread Thomas Goirand
brian m. carlson wrote: On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 04:13:59PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: Except the issue is not about dual licensing, but about intent being different to what the license actually says. i.e. The GPL3 the code is supposed to be released under doesn't have these obligations, and

Re: Bug#550031: ITP: libjs-extjs -- a cross-browser JavaScript library

2009-10-07 Thread Marcus Better
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thomas Goirand skrev: Please do not start a 100 post thread in this ITP if this has been discussed in the past (let's not loose time twice on a bad license). I just would like to have a link here to the archive of the old discussion about if one

Re: Bug#550031: ITP: libjs-extjs -- a cross-browser JavaScript library

2009-10-07 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Oct 07, Thomas Goirand tho...@goirand.fr wrote: may be a fail of the dissident test, as there is the word must. Which would not make it non-free either, as it is not part of the DFSG. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature