Package: general
Severity: wishlist
Many executables in .../sbin have their man pages in section 1 instead
of section 8.
Perhaps a piuparts like script could comb over the apt-file search
results to target them.
Not sure if a policy violation. Or if should be made part of policy.
P.S., I am
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:54:54 +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
Many executables in .../sbin have their man pages in section 1 instead
of section 8.
Perhaps a piuparts like script could comb over the apt-file search
results to target them.
Sounds more like a possible new test for lintian?
Hi jidanni,
On Montag, 22. Februar 2010, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
Many executables in .../sbin have their man pages in section 1 instead
of section 8.
This is indeed a policy violation as it's covered by policy indirectly via
FHS:
On 22/02/10 15:54, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
Many executables in .../sbin have their man pages in section 1 instead
of section 8.
Perhaps a piuparts like script could comb over the apt-file search
results to target them.
This could rather be a lintian check.
Emilio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
HL Do you intend to file individual bugs? I'd appreciate this.
Actually I've filed many individual bugs, some even just today.
Then I got this great idea that instead of me just mentioning in to
packages that I've stumbled into, there could be a systematic combing of
all Debian.
--
To
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 17:07, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
P.S., I am sure I filed this bug in the right place, as reportbug says
general General problems (e.g., that many manpages are mode 755).
I'm tempted to close this bug or reassign to reportbug ;-)
Please don't.
IME
Hi jidanni,
On Montag, 22. Februar 2010, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
Then I got this great idea that instead of me just mentioning in to
packages that I've stumbled into, there could be a systematic combing of
all Debian.
Can you point me to bugs about manpages in section 1 which belong in
Hi Sandro,
please don't cc: me, I'm subscribed.
On Montag, 22. Februar 2010, Sandro Tosi wrote:
I'm tempted to close this bug or reassign to reportbug ;-)
Please don't.
Neither? ;)
The one above is the description of 'general' we retrieve from
[1], that's the canonical place for
I tried to find all bugs with section 8 in their title via
http://bugs.debian.org
An error occurred. Error was: You have to choose something to select by
I'll try this to at least find (most of) mine:
$ w3m -cols -dump
clone 570991 -1
reassign -1 lintian
retitle -1 please add a check against commands in /sbin using section 1
manpages
severity -1 wishlist
block 570991 by 476403
block 570991 by 512447
block 570991 by 512449
block 570991 by 512450
block 570991 by 512451
block 570991 by 512452
block 570991 by
# Cc to -devel for information after the reassign
merge 570980 348864
thanks
Holger Levsen wrote, Monday, February 22, 2010 5:19 PM
clone 570991 -1
reassign -1 lintian
retitle -1 please add a check against commands in /sbin using section 1
manpages
fwiw, there *was* such a lintian check,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
clone 570991 -1
Bug#570991: tuxtype: Package with doc/AUTHORS and doc/ChangeLog and doc/TODO
Bug 570991 cloned as bug 570994.
reassign -1 lintian
Bug #570994 [tuxtype] tuxtype: Package with doc/AUTHORS and doc/ChangeLog and
doc/TODO
Bug
gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org writes:
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:54:54 +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
Many executables in .../sbin have their man pages in section 1 instead
of section 8.
Perhaps a piuparts like script could comb over the apt-file search
results to target them.
Sounds
#348864 ...
--
Raphael Geissert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201002221916.54574.atom...@gmail.com
14 matches
Mail list logo
