On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Nicolas CANIART nico...@caniart.net wrote:
So is BOLA a DFSG compliant license or not ? Who is to decide ?
If not, what should be done with BOLA licensed software packages in main ?
This has gone unanswered for a while, I wanted to voice my opinion on
the
Hi,
So is BOLA a DFSG compliant license or not ? Who is to decide ?
If not, what should be done with BOLA licensed software packages in main ?
If it is, again, I am still looking for a sponsor. Package files are
here: http://caniart.nicolas.free.fr/debian/
Thanks,
Nicolas.
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nicolas CANIART nico...@caniart.net
* Package name: python-sphinx-aafig
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Leandro Lucarella llucax at gmail com
* URL : http://pypi.python.org/sphinxcontrib-aafig/
* License : BOLA
* Nicolas CANIART nico...@caniart.net, 2011-06-05, 12:06:
* Package name: python-sphinx-aafig
Why such a package name? It's neither the upstream name
(sphinxcontrib-aafig) nor policy-compliant[0] name for the binary
package (python-sphinxcontrib-aafig).
* URL :
2011/6/5 Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org:
* Nicolas CANIART nico...@caniart.net, 2011-06-05, 12:06:
* Package name : python-sphinx-aafig
Why such a package name? [...]
Done.
* URL : http://pypi.python.org/sphinxcontrib-aafig/
I think you meant:
5 matches
Mail list logo
