Hi,
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 07:38:16AM -0400, Paul R. Tagliamonte wrote:
Just as unstable has sid, experimental is rc-buggy, the rc car
from toy story.
Hilarious joke :)
T
Yes indeed funny. I like it. But not well documented.
If it stays this way, I should think documenting it in my
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
it seems that apt is handling the codename 'rc-buggy' for experimental
not correctly.
zobel@kvasir:~% sudo apt-get update
[...]
Fetched 26.4 MB in 9s (2,923 kB/s)
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:02:11 +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
it seems that apt is handling the codename 'rc-buggy' for experimental
not correctly.
zobel@kvasir:~% sudo apt-get update
[...]
Fetched 26.4 MB in 9s (2,923 kB/s)
On 03/28/2013 11:21 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
rc-buggy is not a codename, it's a bad joke. Don't use it?
I actually never noticed the pun but very much like the idea as it would
be equivalent to the pun used for unstable (=sid), the pun fits perfect.
Why not make rc-buggy the official code
Hi,
On Thu Mar 28, 2013 at 11:21:29 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:02:11 +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Putting debian-devel@l.d.o on CC for this bug report, as this change
might have larger impact on installations, so discussing this first
might be a good idea.
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:56:52AM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Hi,
On Thu Mar 28, 2013 at 11:21:29 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:02:11 +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Putting debian-devel@l.d.o on CC for this bug report, as this change
might have larger
Just as unstable has sid, experimental is rc-buggy, the rc car from toy
story.
Hilarious joke :)
T
On Mar 28, 2013 6:36 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de wrote:
On 03/28/2013 11:21 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
rc-buggy is not a codename, it's a bad joke. Don't use
That explains why rc-buggy started showing up against experimental
packages on packages.debian.org. I assumed it was a PDO bug. I guess
everyone has stopped laughing now. Can we get rid of it? (It's also
very misleading).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:56:52 +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Hi,
On Thu Mar 28, 2013 at 11:21:29 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:02:11 +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Putting debian-devel@l.d.o on CC for this bug report, as this change
might have larger
Hi,
On Thu Mar 28, 2013 at 14:32:12 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:56:52 +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Hi,
On Thu Mar 28, 2013 at 11:21:29 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:02:11 +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Putting
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 02:41:36PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
What makes you think it's used?
My grep on access logs on ftp.d.o mirrors.
But as you see, it's not actually useable and shows that warning.
It was a joke that was never announced, to keep the RT from picking the
last name
11 matches
Mail list logo
