On 12 December 2014 at 02:23, Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote:
On Dec 12, 2014, at 08:36 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
Even for the source package name, “pathlib” is IMO too general. This is
specifically a library for Python programmers only; its source package
name should not grab a generic name
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 10.12.2014, 17:17 +0100 schrieb Frank Brehm:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Frank Brehm frank.br...@profitbricks.com
* Package name: pathlib
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net
* URL :
Am Donnerstag, den 11.12.2014, 14:35 +0100 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 10.12.2014, 17:17 +0100 schrieb Frank Brehm:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Frank Brehm frank.br...@profitbricks.com
* Package name: pathlib
Version : 1.0.1
Benjamin Drung benjamin.dr...@profitbricks.com writes:
The source is called pathlib, but the binary packages are called
python-pathlib and python-pathlib-doc.
Even for the source package name, “pathlib” is IMO too general. This is
specifically a library for Python programmers only; its source
On Dec 12, 2014, at 08:36 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
Even for the source package name, “pathlib” is IMO too general. This is
specifically a library for Python programmers only; its source package
name should not grab a generic name like “pathlib”.
Why not first-come-first-served?
Cheers,
-Barry
On Thursday, December 11, 2014 09:23:36 PM Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Dec 12, 2014, at 08:36 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
Even for the source package name, “pathlib” is IMO too general. This is
specifically a library for Python programmers only; its source package
name should not grab a generic name like
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Frank Brehm frank.br...@profitbricks.com
* Package name: pathlib
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pathlib
* License : MIT Licence
Programming
7 matches
Mail list logo