]] Joachim Breitner
Practically, I expect the intersection of those who want to use this
package, and who need to have a different layout in /srv to be empty.
So if I make the path configurable, it is adding complexity purely for
policy compliance, and hence it is low priority for me.
I
* Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org [150823 07:24]:
With pow-priority, you mean one that does not get shown by default? But
is that much better than allowing the interested admin to change the
configuration afterwards?
Actually, I was thinking it should be similar to postfix, which looks
On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 13:24:03 +0200
Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org wrote:
Hi Marvin,
Am Samstag, den 22.08.2015, 16:47 -0400 schrieb Marvin Renich:
I was under the (perhaps mistaken) impression that part of the
purpose of /srv was to allow complete admin discretion with the
Hi Sven,
Am Sonntag, den 23.08.2015, 18:18 +0200 schrieb Sven Bartscher:
Note that my package does _not_ touch or put files in /srv. It
merely
uses files that are put in a certain directory that, that the admin
has to create first. Does that mitigate your concerns?
A problem, that I
Hi Marvin,
Am Samstag, den 22.08.2015, 16:47 -0400 schrieb Marvin Renich:
I was under the (perhaps mistaken) impression that part of the
purpose of /srv was to allow complete admin discretion with the
directory structure, and that distributions were not to mandate any
specific directory
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: local-apt-repository
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org
* URL :
* Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org, 2015-08-22, 13:58:
With this package installed, every Debian package (i.e. a *.deb file)
dropped into /srv/local-apt-repository
Sounds like an FHS violation: “no program should rely on a specific
subdirectory structure of /srv existing or data
Hi Jakub,
Am Samstag, den 22.08.2015, 14:54 +0200 schrieb Jakub Wilk:
* Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org, 2015-08-22, 13:58:
With this package installed, every Debian package (i.e. a *.deb
file)
dropped into /srv/local-apt-repository
Sounds like an FHS violation: “no program should
* Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org [150822 09:04]:
Hi Jakub,
Am Samstag, den 22.08.2015, 14:54 +0200 schrieb Jakub Wilk:
* Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org, 2015-08-22, 13:58:
With this package installed, every Debian package (i.e. a *.deb
file)
dropped into
On السبت 22 آب 2015 13:47, Marvin Renich wrote:
So it is not wrong to use this directory. Also, all alternatives are
wrong in some way as well.
I was under the (perhaps mistaken) impression that part of the purpose
of /srv was to allow complete admin discretion with the directory
10 matches
Mail list logo
