Re: Bug#830624: ITP: xplayer -- Simple media player based on GStreamer.

2016-07-11 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 07/11/2016 06:39 PM, Margarita Manterola wrote: > I don't think this is a fair assessment. There are several desktops that are > based on the GTK libraries. A GTK application that uses the library but does > not > use any desktop specific libraries / extensions / etc, can be considered >

Re: Bug#830624: ITP: xplayer -- Simple media player based on GStreamer.

2016-07-11 Thread Margarita Manterola
Hola John Paul Adrian Glaubitz! > Unlike previously mentioned in this discussion, these applications aren't > fully > desktop-agnostic as they are written in GTK and the Mint people admit that > themselves. I don't think this is a fair assessment. There are several desktops that are based on

Re: Bug#830624: ITP: xplayer -- Simple media player based on GStreamer.

2016-07-11 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 07/10/2016 03:34 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > That blog post made me think this was a coordinated effort between various DEs > to create some apps that they all would use. Which would mean we wouldn't > need a > gnome-$foo fork Cinnamon, another one for Mate, etc... It isn't, it's a

Re: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#830624: ITP: xplayer -- Simple media player based on GStreamer.

2016-07-11 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 07/11/2016 10:45 AM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On Sun, 2016-07-10 at 08:39 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> Maybe the XFCE / Cinnamon / Mate maintainers can confirm if that is indeed >> the plan. > > Talking for pkg-xfce: I have no idea what this is about. The Linux Mint people (or

Re: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#830624: ITP: xplayer -- Simple media player based on GStreamer.

2016-07-11 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On Sun, 2016-07-10 at 08:39 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Maybe the XFCE / Cinnamon / Mate maintainers can confirm if that is indeed > the plan. Talking for pkg-xfce: I have no idea what this is about. Regards, -- Yves-Alexis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed

Re: Bug#830624: ITP: xplayer -- Simple media player based on GStreamer.

2016-07-10 Thread Bjørn Mork
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort writes: > On 09/07/16 22:31, Franciscarlos Santos Soares wrote: >> Hi Emilio! >> >> Thank you for contacting us. In fact, like independent application of any >> DE, >> but they were compatible with the traditional look of windows and based on >> the

Re: Bug#830624: ITP: xplayer -- Simple media player based on GStreamer.

2016-07-10 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 10/07/16 15:14, Bjørn Mork wrote: > Emilio Pozuelo Monfort writes: >> On 09/07/16 22:31, Franciscarlos Santos Soares wrote: >>> Hi Emilio! >>> >>> Thank you for contacting us. In fact, like independent application of any >>> DE, >>> but they were compatible with the

Re: Bug#830624: ITP: xplayer -- Simple media player based on GStreamer.

2016-07-10 Thread Steve Cotton
m On 10 July 2016 08:59:59 CEST, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >On 07/10/2016 08:39 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> I foupml0lnd >http://segfault.linuxmint.com/2016/02/the-first-two-x-apps-are-ready/, >> which makes things clearer. Thisf seems to be

Re: Bug#830624: ITP: xplayer -- Simple media player based on GStreamer.

2016-07-10 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 07/10/2016 09:55 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > I don't follow how it is "same concern": As I understand the blog post, > the very purpose of X-Apps is to be desktop-agnostic. Do you consider > pluma well suited as a desktop-agnostic editor? It currently links > against libmate-desktop-2-17

Re: Bug#830624: ITP: xplayer -- Simple media player based on GStreamer.

2016-07-10 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting John Paul Adrian Glaubitz (2016-07-10 08:59:59) > On 07/10/2016 08:39 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > I found > > http://segfault.linuxmint.com/2016/02/the-first-two-x-apps-are-ready/, > > which makes things clearer. This seems to be a cross-desktop (Mate, > > Cinnamon... XFCE?)

Re: Bug#830624: ITP: xplayer -- Simple media player based on GStreamer.

2016-07-10 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 07/10/2016 08:39 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > I found http://segfault.linuxmint.com/2016/02/the-first-two-x-apps-are-ready/, > which makes things clearer. This seems to be a cross-desktop (Mate, > Cinnamon... > XFCE?) project to provide some core apps. Which we wouldn't end up with >

Re: Bug#830624: ITP: xplayer -- Simple media player based on GStreamer.

2016-07-10 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Hi, Please keep the bug report and debian-devel@ in Cc. On 09/07/16 22:31, Franciscarlos Santos Soares wrote: > Hi Emilio! > > Thank you for contacting us. In fact, like independent application of any DE, > but they were compatible with the traditional look of windows and based on > the >

Re: Bug#830624: ITP: xplayer -- Simple media player based on GStreamer.

2016-07-09 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Jul 09, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Do we really need yet another fork of GNOME? Probably not, but I suspect that this problem should be solved upstream... -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Bug#830624: ITP: xplayer -- Simple media player based on GStreamer.

2016-07-09 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 09/07/16 22:05, Franciscarlos Santos Soares wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Franciscarlos Santos Soares > > * Package name: xplayer > Version : 1.0.7 > Upstream Author : Bastien Nocera > * URL :

Bug#830624: ITP: xplayer -- Simple media player based on GStreamer.

2016-07-09 Thread Franciscarlos Santos Soares
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Franciscarlos Santos Soares * Package name: xplayer Version : 1.0.7 Upstream Author : Bastien Nocera * URL : https://github.com/linuxmint/xplayer * License : GPL, LGPL