I just see that propose of removal gnome-dvb-daemon just after I made a
RFA to it... Nice! :-D
I agree that the problem of gnome-dvb-daemon its related to #674156 as
Simon stated.
Are all the packages affected by this issue going to be removed from
testing?
In addition, I will package the newer
On 03/12/12 11:19, José Luis Segura Lucas wrote:
Are all the packages affected by this issue going to be removed
from testing?
No, unless you prevent them from being fixed by making uploads that
are not suitable for wheezy. (You quoted the full text of the email to
which you replied, so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
We are considering removing the following packages from testing as
they have unfixed RC bugs filed against them. The packages can be
found in the attached dd-list. The bugs that put them on this list
can be found in the removals file (also
Niels Thykier writes (Candidates for removal from testing (2012-11-30)):
We are considering removing the following packages from testing as
they have unfixed RC bugs filed against them. The packages can be
found in the attached dd-list. The bugs that put them on this list
can be found
# #692623
remove fossil/1:1.22.1-1
This is worrying because fossil is the vcs used by sqlite upstream.
It looks like fixing this would involve Packaging cson too. The
alternative of dumping cson into the fossil source tree is probably
not ideal.
Barak, have you looked at this at all
On 30/11/12 11:55, Niels Thykier wrote:
The packages have been selected based on the following criteria: *
The package had at least one RC bug without activity for the past
14 days.
...
Debian GNOME Maintainers
pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org gnome-dvb-daemon
(U)
I have no
Barak A. Pearlmutter writes (Re: Candidates for removal from testing
(2012-11-30)):
CSON is not used in the Debian build: the relevant source files can be
replaced by empty files and the fossil package will build fine. (They
cannot just be removed because make expects them.)
Ah. I think
On 30.11.2012 13:03, Simon McVittie wrote:
Suggested options include:
A) Consider the new ABI to be right. Recompile every package that
mentions the affected structs (including everything that
subclasses GstElement), unless it has already been compiled
against GLib 2.32 on every
Thanks for the update!
--
I pledge not to post to any systemd-related thread on -devel until
(at least) 2013.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Barak A. Pearlmutter writes (Re: Candidates for removal from testing
(2012-11-30)):
Good idea. Will add this info to the bug report.
Technically there are two bugs. 692623 is for the CSON not evil files
being derived files rather than truly original source, while 692624
Good idea. Will add this info to the bug report.
Technically there are two bugs. 692623 is for the CSON not evil files
being derived files rather than truly original source, while 692624 is
for the not evil license itself. The latter is already tagged
wheezy-ignore, while the former is causing
The patch for both of these bugs is to just replace
src/cson_amalgamation.{c,h}
by empty files in a +dfsg recombobulated upstream tarball.
I'll go ahead and do the machinations. Unless someone else does an NMU
first. A 0-day NMU. Which I totally wouldn't mind. Hint Hint.
12 matches
Mail list logo
