On 23/09/2012 17:49, Joachim Breitner wrote:
we need to upload all450 packages with no source change
That's called a binNMU and is very simple to schedule, as you already
know ;)
In the OCaml team, we have the very same issue and we try to avoid
arch:all packages for libraries and
On 23/09/2012 17:49, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 23.09.2012, 15:59 +0200 schrieb Joerg Jaspert:
The DM flag (and in future ACL) shows that one trusts that one DM
to do a good job on that one package. Extending it like this DM
may upload all packages of [whateverbiglist] is just
Le lundi 24 septembre 2012 23:53:01, Kurt Roeckx a écrit :
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 07:33:03PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
package X would depend on the maintainer field of the packages *already*
in Debian, not the one in the package he uploads. Just the way it is at
One way to read
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 07:13:08PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
(BTW, source only uploads anyone? Then I can easily do the uploads on my
own and need neither the DDs nor the DMs in my team to do what computers
can do better.)
If it's happening often enough, you may want to think about
[Joachim Breitner]
Would it be possible to extend the syntax to specify lists of
packages not by name, but by Maintainer,
e.g. pkg-haskell-maintainers@l.a.d.o? Bonus points if such an
assigment is expanded at dinstall time, so that the statement “DM
1234 may upload all packages owned by
Hi,
Am Montag, den 24.09.2012, 11:59 -0500 schrieb Peter Samuelson:
[Joachim Breitner]
Would it be possible to extend the syntax to specify lists of
packages not by name, but by Maintainer,
e.g. pkg-haskell-maintainers@l.a.d.o? Bonus points if such an
assigment is expanded at dinstall
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 07:33:03PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Hi,
Am Montag, den 24.09.2012, 11:59 -0500 schrieb Peter Samuelson:
[Joachim Breitner]
Would it be possible to extend the syntax to specify lists of
packages not by name, but by Maintainer,
e.g.
Quoting Gergely Nagy (alger...@madhouse-project.org):
Yep, that is one of the solutions I mentioned earlier. Therefore, if a
DM does care, migrating to the new system is by all means possible, and
they have very little to do, they will not be punished for another
person's absence or mistake.
Hi!
On Sat, 2012-09-22 at 10:06:35 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
This new interface replaces the old DMUA field. The old field will stop
working on the 24th of November 2012, from then on only packages
explicitly granted upload permission to their DMs using the interface
described here will
On 12978 March 1977, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Would it be possible to extend the syntax to specify lists of packages
not by name, but by Maintainer, e.g. pkg-haskell-maintainers@l.a.d.o?
Not with the current setup. We have a m:n relation between DMs and
source packages. It's an interesting idea
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 23.09.2012, 15:59 +0200 schrieb Joerg Jaspert:
The DM flag (and in future ACL) shows that one trusts that one DM to do
a good job on that one package. Extending it like this DM may upload
all packages of [whateverbiglist] is just wrong.
(Of course this is just
On 09/23/2012 11:49 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Also, the real time-consuming work for us is when we
need to upload all450 packages with no source change, or a trivial
one.
Someone assigned with such task as modifying (even trivially)
and uploading 450 packages should definitively be(come) a
Hi,
Am Montag, den 24.09.2012, 00:26 +0800 schrieb Thomas Goirand:
On 09/23/2012 11:49 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Also, the real time-consuming work for us is when we
need to upload all450 packages with no source change, or a trivial
one.
Someone assigned with such task as modifying
Hi,
On 22.09.2012 10:06, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
We are using this opportunity to clean up the DM database and will not
convert any of the DMUA flags to the new format, but two months ought to
be enough for any active DM to ensure their sponsor DDs have set the new
permission.
please don't.
Arno Töll a...@debian.org writes:
On 22.09.2012 10:06, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
We are using this opportunity to clean up the DM database and will not
convert any of the DMUA flags to the new format, but two months ought to
be enough for any active DM to ensure their sponsor DDs have set the
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 11:56:54AM +0200, Arno Tröll wrote:
Hi,
On 22.09.2012 10:06, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
We are using this opportunity to clean up the DM database and will not
convert any of the DMUA flags to the new format, but two months ought to
be enough for any active DM to
Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org writes:
If any DM asks me to, and they can show they've made uploads (with
DMUA) before this announcement for that package, and that they've not
broken things in a gnarly gnarly way (and if their sponsor is VAC,
MIA or otherwise not here), I don't think I'd
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 22.09.2012, 10:06 +0200 schrieb Ansgar Burchardt:
During the FTPMaster meeting last week we have implemented the new
interface for managing DM permissions[1].
very cool stuff, this makes DMs much more useful in teams with a large
amount of packages, thanks a lot!
Would it
18 matches
Mail list logo
