On Sat, 06 Aug 2011 07:58:35 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 11:28:55PM +, Felipe Sateler wrote:
This does not apply to our topic as well. These lists are not
(publicly) archived (or am I missing something?)
BTW, both gmane and the mail archive seem to be
Quoting Olly Betts (o...@survex.com):
rather than having a separate flag state for those, but the reports have
been reviewed by a human, so should be higher quality than the
unfiltered reports from clicks on the Spam buttons.
Reports we get through the Spam buttons *are* reviewed by
humans.
Hiya,
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 09:34:45AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Olly Betts (o...@survex.com):
rather than having a separate flag state for those, but the reports have
been reviewed by a human, so should be higher quality than the
unfiltered reports from clicks on the
Olly Betts schrieb am Friday, den 05. August 2011:
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 11:01:22AM +, Cord Beermann wrote:
[we should seperate the GSoC-project from the ListArchiveSpam efforts]
Indeed, I've dropped soc-coordination.
as i wrote the review-stuff explained in
* Alexander Wirt formo...@formorer.de [110804 11:30]:
P.S. I know its nice to be open. But publishing real names and mailaddresses
is a problem and at least problematic under german law (and probably for
other countries).
While publishing real names and mailing addresses might be a problem,
Bernhard R. Link schrieb am Friday, den 05. August 2011:
* Alexander Wirt formo...@formorer.de [110804 11:30]:
P.S. I know its nice to be open. But publishing real names and mailaddresses
is a problem and at least problematic under german law (and probably for
other countries).
While
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 12:20:03PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
And you are of course sure that everybody using reportbug knows there address
will be published? We have several complaints a month about the problem.
Please stick to the topic. In this thread it is about mailing lists.
However,
[sorry for pressing wrong key and sending unfinished mail]
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 12:20:03PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
And you are of course sure that everybody using reportbug knows there address
will be published? We have several complaints a month about the problem.
Please stick to the
Andreas Tille schrieb am Friday, den 05. August 2011:
[sorry for pressing wrong key and sending unfinished mail]
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 12:20:03PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
And you are of course sure that everybody using reportbug knows there
address
will be published? We have
* Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu [2011-08-05 12:39]:
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 12:20:03PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
And you are of course sure that everybody using reportbug knows there
address
will be published? We have several complaints a month about the problem.
Please stick to
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 01:56:16PM +0200, Martin Wuertele wrote:
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 12:20:03PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
And you are of course sure that everybody using reportbug knows there
address
will be published? We have several complaints a month about the problem.
On Fri, 05 Aug 2011 14:15:34 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 01:56:16PM +0200, Martin Wuertele wrote:
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 12:20:03PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
And you are of course sure that everybody using reportbug knows
there address will be published? We
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 11:28:55PM +, Felipe Sateler wrote:
This does not apply to our topic as well. These lists are not
(publicly) archived (or am I missing something?)
BTW, both gmane and the mail archive seem to be archiving the bugs lists.
I have no idea why people are really
sad that you have to do this while Debian mailing
lists archives available as mbox *do exist* (but they're only
available for DDs with accounts in Debian machines).
I understand there could be some reluctance to offering these
completely anonymously but I wonder if there could be an intermediate
way
for them. This allows us to
I find it really sad that you have to do this while Debian mailing
lists archives available as mbox *do exist* (but they're only
available for DDs with accounts in Debian machines).
I understand there could be some reluctance to offering these
completely
Quoting Niels Thykier (ni...@thykier.net):
To my knowledge you can download them via:
http://lists.debian.org/cgi-bin/mbox/list-MM
Indeed. Well, it seems that at least Sukhbir, /me and Andreas Tille
were'nt aware of this (for Sukhbir, that's understandable, for Andreas
and /me, only
Christian PERRIER schrieb am Thursday, den 04. August 2011:
Quoting Niels Thykier (ni...@thykier.net):
To my knowledge you can download them via:
http://lists.debian.org/cgi-bin/mbox/list-MM
Indeed. Well, it seems that at least Sukhbir, /me and Andreas Tille
were'nt aware of
and then creates a mbox archive for them. This allows us to
I find it really sad that you have to do this while Debian mailing
lists archives available as mbox *do exist* (but they're only
available for DDs with accounts in Debian machines).
I understand there could be some reluctance to offering
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 09:44:49AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
We had an ongoing discussion about privacy and so
spam and so on about the mboxes. We even managed to get consense yesterday.
To bring some light into this I would like to publish this consense we
had:
A filter needs to be
Andreas Tille schrieb am Thursday, den 04. August 2011:
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 09:44:49AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
We had an ongoing discussion about privacy and so
spam and so on about the mboxes. We even managed to get consense yesterday.
To bring some light into this I would like
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 10:31:33AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
Just for the record. The mboxes are not for being published. We are currently
working on getting more data privacy protection in the archive so just
publishing the mboxes would just be counterproductive.
Thanks for clarifying
Andreas Tille schrieb am Thursday, den 04. August 2011:
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 10:31:33AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
Just for the record. The mboxes are not for being published. We are
currently
working on getting more data privacy protection in the archive so just
publishing the
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 11:02:20AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
Just for the record. The mboxes are not for being published. We are
currently
working on getting more data privacy protection in the archive so just
publishing the mboxes would just be counterproductive.
Thanks for
Andreas Tille schrieb am Thursday, den 04. August 2011:
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 11:02:20AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
Just for the record. The mboxes are not for being published. We are
currently
working on getting more data privacy protection in the archive so just
publishing
Sukhbir Singh schrieb am Thursday, den 04. August 2011:
Hi Alex,
Can we have some prototype/ format of the Message-IDs that you want us
to strip? It would be beneficial for both sides because then we can
show you what we will be handling and you can tell if something else
needs to be taken
Hi Alex,
Can we have some prototype/ format of the Message-IDs that you want us
to strip? It would be beneficial for both sides because then we can
show you what we will be handling and you can tell if something else
needs to be taken care of.
Thanks for the help,
--
Sukhbir
--
To
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 11:29:41AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
As far as I know it is not only Christian and if we really want to get
more people involved into Debian (including non-technicans) tasks like
cleaning up the list archive from SPAM might be somehow interesting.
Yeah, but I
Andreas Tille schrieb am Thursday, den 04. August 2011:
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 11:29:41AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
As far as I know it is not only Christian and if we really want to get
more people involved into Debian (including non-technicans) tasks like
cleaning up the list
Hallo! Du (Andreas Tille) hast geschrieben:
[we should seperate the GSoC-project from the ListArchiveSpam efforts]
As far as I know it is not only Christian and if we really want to get
more people involved into Debian (including non-technicans) tasks like
cleaning up the list archive from
Hello Andreas Tille,
Am 2011-08-04 10:22:43, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
- Parse the existing mboxes and strip them down to the following
information
Message-id: ID
From: Name of poster e-mail@of.poster
Date: Date
Subject: Subject
Content
snip
So far
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 11:01:22AM +, Cord Beermann wrote:
[we should seperate the GSoC-project from the ListArchiveSpam efforts]
Indeed, I've dropped soc-coordination.
as i wrote the review-stuff explained in
31 matches
Mail list logo
