Re: Merge request friendly handling of debian/changelog

2019-10-22 Thread Jeremy Bicha
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 11:06 PM Bastian Blank wrote: > There is "gbp dch", which ignores merge commits (so no really good for > merge requests), but I don't consider it to have enough control over the > content of the changelog. Just set your merge settings per project to fast-forward. Thanks,

Accepted gitlab-workhorse 8.8.1+debian-1 (source) into experimental

2019-10-22 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 18:01:42 +0530 Source: gitlab-workhorse Architecture: source Version: 8.8.1+debian-1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Go Packaging Team Changed-By: Utkarsh Gupta Changes: gitlab

Re: Merge request friendly handling of debian/changelog

2019-10-22 Thread gregor herrmann
On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 07:35:55 -0400, Sam Hartman wrote: > Or some code that knows how to merge changelogs dpkg-mergechangelogs(1) is a nice helper for some of the merge situations. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.

Re: Merge request friendly handling of debian/changelog

2019-10-22 Thread Sam Hartman
I agree that better handling of things like debian/changelog is something we should focus effort on. I think we can either do something gbp dch like, possibly allowing commits to annotate whether and to what extent they should be included in changelog. Or some code that knows how to merge

Re: Merge request friendly handling of debian/changelog

2019-10-21 Thread Joseph Herlant
Hi Bastian, Full disclaimer: I probably don't contribute often enough inside Debian to be a reference on it but thinking about it I'm wondering if it wouldn't be easier to do it another way. On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 8:06 PM Bastian Blank wrote: > There is "gbp dch", which ignores

Merge request friendly handling of debian/changelog

2019-10-21 Thread Bastian Blank
Moin In Debian most people prefer to have changelog entries with all changes, so changes always contain a modification to debian/changelog. If we also start to use merge requests on Salsa, all those changes will contain modifications to debian/changelog, which will usualy conflict with each

Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos

2019-10-21 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, 2019-10-21 at 18:58 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote: > I'm pretty sure it does exist, since I wrote it :p > > https://github.com/metux/docker-buildpackage I couldn't find it in Debian so I incorrectly assumed, sorry. In case you want to get it into Debian: https://mentors.debian.

Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos

2019-10-21 Thread Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
wondering if there is something Debian can do to be even more > successful in the container world. You could use dck-buildpackage --create-baseimage to do that. Feel free to create some target configs, and I'll be happy to add them. --mtx -- Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult Free software and Linux embedded e

Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos

2019-10-21 Thread Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
On 07.10.19 13:17, Shengjing Zhu wrote: > Why not have a repository for it, like dockerhub. So this becomes > "pull latest build env", which saves lots of time("re-bootstrap" is > still slow nowadays). No idea how sbuild works these days (turned away from it aeons ago, as I've found it too

Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos

2019-10-21 Thread Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
On 05.10.19 18:25, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: Hi, > Having something that works with git-buildpackage would be really nice, :) > though. Even better if it would allow to use the k8s API to build things... Patches are always welcomed :) There're some problems to be solved for remote hosts (IMHO,

Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos

2019-10-21 Thread Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
On 05.10.19 03:31, Paul Wise wrote: > On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 10:49 PM Enrico Weigelt wrote: >> On 24.07.19 08:17, Marc Haber wrote: >> >>> Do we have a build technology that uses containers instead of chroots >>> yet? >> >> Something like docker-buildpackage ? > > AFAICT, docker-buildpackage

Re: Wifi en debian

2019-10-20 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2019-10-20 18:32:00 -0400 (-0400), Peter Silva wrote: [...] > Debian is very principled about not including non-free software, but you > can build an installation medium that includes the firmware so almost all > wifi should work out of the box. [...] Or use the installation images

Re: Wifi en debian

2019-10-20 Thread Peter Silva
translation of spanish email: disappointed wifi didn´t work out of the box with Debian thinking wifi drivers are missing. answer: I don't think the drivers are the problem for wifi in Debian. Most, if not all wireless chipsets have open source drivers which are included. The problem

Wifi en debian

2019-10-20 Thread riber enyos
Queridos debianos, Estos días estoy probando diferentes distribuciones de linux. Entre ellas Debian. Creía que era una de las mejores, pero me he dado cuenta de que es la peor, según mis gustos. ¿Como puede ser, que una distribución del 2019 venga sin los drivers del wifi instalados??? De todas

Accepted debian-installer-launcher 36 (source) into unstable

2019-10-20 Thread Holger Wansing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 22:10:50 +0200 Source: debian-installer-launcher Architecture: source Version: 36 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Holger Wansing Changes: debian-installer-launcher

Accepted debian-edu-doc 2.10.20 (source) into unstable

2019-10-20 Thread Holger Levsen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 15:21:06 +0200 Source: debian-edu-doc Architecture: source Version: 2.10.20 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Edu Developers Changed-By: Holger Levsen Changes: debian-edu-doc (2.10.20

Présentation de Debian au Capitole du libre

2019-10-19 Thread Jean-Philippe MENGUAL
Hello, J'ai proposé au capitole du libre une présentation de Debian volontairement orientée grand public, donc un peu hétérodoxe. Ca manque d'exactitude lexicale et de rigueur terminologique, mais c'est fait pour, via l'analogie du magasin de distribution. Je vous soumets le premier jet (pleins

Une information pour ceux qui veulent nous aider à promouvoir Debian

2019-10-19 Thread Jean-Philippe MENGUAL
Bonjour à tous, Déjà pour présenter à ceux qui ne connaissent pas: Debian France est une asso française qui promeut Debian. Elle est administrée par des dévelopeurs Debian, mais pas que (je suppose qu'elle est connue mais bon, sait-on jamais s'il y a de récents et nouveaux DD). En tant que Trust

[Doc] Deep Learning & Debian Development

2019-10-13 Thread Mo Zhou
Hi fellow devs, FYI, I wrote a lengthy documentation that covers many sub-topics about "Deep Learning & Debian Development": https://people.debian.org/~lumin/debian-dl.html The topics in the document is associated to ~90% of my debian activities. Here is the outline of the

Accepted breezy-debian 2.8.31 (source) into unstable

2019-10-13 Thread Jelmer Vernooij
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 13:03:27 + Source: breezy-debian Architecture: source Version: 2.8.31 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Bazaar Maintainers Changed-By: Jelmer Vernooij Changes: breezy-debian (2.8.31

Accepted debian-edu-config 2.11.5 (source) into unstable

2019-10-13 Thread Holger Levsen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 13:06:16 +0200 Source: debian-edu-config Architecture: source Version: 2.11.5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Edu Developers Changed-By: Holger Levsen Changes: debian-edu-config (2.11.5

Accepted debian-edu 2.11.4 (source) into unstable

2019-10-12 Thread Holger Levsen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2019 15:17:01 +0200 Source: debian-edu Architecture: source Version: 2.11.4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Edu Developers Changed-By: Holger Levsen Changes: debian-edu (2.11.4) unstable

Accepted nmon 16m+debian-1 (source) into unstable

2019-10-12 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2019 14:42:54 +0200 Source: nmon Architecture: source Version: 16m+debian-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Salvatore Bonaccorso Changed-By: Salvatore Bonaccorso Changes: nmon (16m+debian-1

Accepted maven-debian-helper 2.4 (source) into unstable

2019-10-10 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 09:50:04 +0200 Source: maven-debian-helper Architecture: source Version: 2.4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers Changed-By: Emmanuel Bourg Changes: maven-debian-helper

Accepted debian-edu-config 2.11.4 (source) into unstable

2019-10-08 Thread Holger Levsen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 14:47:06 +0200 Source: debian-edu-config Architecture: source Version: 2.11.4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Edu Developers Changed-By: Holger Levsen Changes: debian-edu-config (2.11.4

Accepted debian-edu-install 2.11.2 (source) into unstable

2019-10-08 Thread Holger Levsen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 11:28:45 +0200 Source: debian-edu-install Architecture: source Version: 2.11.2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Edu Developers Changed-By: Holger Levsen Changes: debian-edu-install

InstallBootstrap (was: Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos)

2019-10-08 Thread Johannes Schauer
lso use this opportunity for a word of caution. One of the core reasons why I created mmdebstrap was to create a proof-of-concept for the idea that it should at some point be possible to create a chroot of Debian (or a derivative) without all the magic instructions which currently live in debootst

Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos

2019-10-08 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Paul Wise (2019-10-08 02:35:14) > On Mon, 2019-10-07 at 11:29 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > > > I think "re-bootstrap, don't upgrade" is an equally good principle for > > autopkgtest and sbuild? Both will be equally susceptible to accumulating > > cruft during upgrades that wouldn't have

"adt-virt-*" abstraction (was Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos)

2019-10-08 Thread Holger Levsen
fwiw, src:piuparts also includes a (now) derived implementation of "adt-virt-*"... -- cheers, Holger --- holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org PGP fingerprint: B8BF

Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos

2019-10-07 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, 2019-10-07 at 11:29 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > I think "re-bootstrap, don't upgrade" is an equally good principle for > autopkgtest and sbuild? Both will be equally susceptible to accumulating > cruft during upgrades that wouldn't have been there in a fresh debootstrap, > which is

Accepted openstack-debian-images 1.37 (source) into unstable

2019-10-07 Thread Thomas Goirand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 11:51:53 +0100 Source: openstack-debian-images Architecture: source Version: 1.37 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian OpenStack Changed-By: Thomas Goirand Changes: openstack-debian-images

Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos

2019-10-07 Thread Ian Jackson
Paul Wise writes ("Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos"): > On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 7:23 PM Simon McVittie wrote: > > FYI, this is because autopkgtest has an abstraction for multiple > > container/virtualization mechanisms (lxc, lxd, qemu, sc

Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos

2019-10-07 Thread Philipp Kern
t'd probably be better to make bootstrapping faster rather than trusting random binaries on the internet. (Unless we grow an "assemble an image from debs" service on, say, ftp-master.) creating a working sbuild chroot takes 10 seconds on my system: $ time mmdebstrap --variant=essential unstab

Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos

2019-10-07 Thread Johannes Schauer
which saves lots of time("re-bootstrap" is still > > slow nowadays). > In that case it'd probably be better to make bootstrapping faster rather > than trusting random binaries on the internet. (Unless we grow an > "assemble an image from debs" service on, s

Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos

2019-10-07 Thread Shengjing Zhu
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 7:21 PM Philipp Kern wrote: > In that case it'd probably be better to make bootstrapping faster rather > than trusting random binaries on the internet. (Unless we grow an > "assemble an image from debs" service on, say, ftp-master.) > We already have such, the cloud image

Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos

2019-10-07 Thread Philipp Kern
On 10/7/2019 1:17 PM, Shengjing Zhu wrote: > On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 6:29 PM Simon McVittie wrote: >> >> On Mon, 07 Oct 2019 at 07:22:53 +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote: >>> Specifically, currently autopkgtest is limited to providing a read-only >>> layer >>> for certain backends and its upstream

Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos

2019-10-07 Thread Shengjing Zhu
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 6:29 PM Simon McVittie wrote: > > On Mon, 07 Oct 2019 at 07:22:53 +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote: > > Specifically, currently autopkgtest is limited to providing a read-only > > layer > > for certain backends and its upstream has no intention of widening the > > scope of >

Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos

2019-10-07 Thread Simon McVittie
On Mon, 07 Oct 2019 at 07:22:53 +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote: > Specifically, currently autopkgtest is limited to providing a read-only layer > for certain backends and its upstream has no intention of widening the scope > of > the software [1]. This means that to upgrade an autopkgtest backend,

Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos

2019-10-07 Thread Shengjing Zhu
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 1:23 PM Johannes Schauer wrote: > > Quoting Paul Wise (2019-10-07 03:38:55) > > On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 7:23 PM Simon McVittie wrote: > > > FYI, this is because autopkgtest has an abstraction for multiple > > > container/virtualization mechanisms (lxc, lxd, qemu, schroot) >

Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos

2019-10-06 Thread Johannes Schauer
Quoting Paul Wise (2019-10-07 03:38:55) > On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 7:23 PM Simon McVittie wrote: > > FYI, this is because autopkgtest has an abstraction for multiple > > container/virtualization mechanisms (lxc, lxd, qemu, schroot) > It seems like this abstraction should be split out of the

Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos

2019-10-06 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 7:23 PM Simon McVittie wrote: > FYI, this is because autopkgtest has an abstraction for multiple > container/virtualization mechanisms (lxc, lxd, qemu, schroot) It seems like this abstraction should be split out of the autopkgtest source and then depended on by

Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos

2019-10-06 Thread Simon McVittie
On Sat, 05 Oct 2019 at 12:41:55 -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > AFAIK sbuild has had this support for a while with --chroot-mode > autopkgtest, --autopkgtest-virt-server (lxc, lxd, or qemu), and > --autopkgtest-virt-server-opts='name of container goes here' will also > do the trick; however,

RE:devscripts uninstallable in Debian Sid due to unmet dependencies

2019-10-06 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
perle 5.30 transition whcih was announced here https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2019/10/msg0.html

Re: devscripts uninstallable in Debian Sid due to unmet dependencies

2019-10-06 Thread Paul Gevers
s.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2019/10/msg0.html Perl transition. Paul signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: devscripts uninstallable in Debian Sid due to unmet dependencies

2019-10-06 Thread Samuel Thibault
stopping > it. > > Anybody else experiencing this as well? Everybody, yes. Please read debian-devel-announce: the perl 5.30 transition was announced there yesterday. Samuel

devscripts uninstallable in Debian Sid due to unmet dependencies

2019-10-06 Thread Otto Kekäläinen
@dda7794f2e25:/# apt update Get:1 http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian sid InRelease [139 kB] Get:2 http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian sid/main amd64 Packages [8244 kB] Fetched 8383 kB in 8s (1107 kB/s) Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done

Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos

2019-10-05 Thread Jose-Luis Rivas
elp`. It's not using k8s API but I don't see a reason why it would not be compatible. Building a Deployment yaml on-the-fly and you're ready. Just calling something different than the `run_docker()` function. With deb-build-pkg you don't even need to be in a Debian system to build stuff. -- __.https://wiki.debian.org/JoseLuisRivas ___'/___ rsa4096/D278F9C15E5461AA3C1E2FCD13EC43EEB9AC8C43

[What happened to CUT?] Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos

2019-10-05 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Bernd Zeimetz writes: > I'm wondering if there is something Debian can do to be even more > successful in the container world. Like regular releases of a container > base image from testing. The amount of packages that needed for that is > limited, the number of RC bugs is probabl

Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos

2019-10-05 Thread Johannes Schauer
Hi, Quoting Nicholas D Steeves (2019-10-05 18:41:55) > Bernd Zeimetz writes: > > On 10/5/19 3:31 AM, Paul Wise wrote: > >> On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 10:49 PM Enrico Weigelt wrote: > >>> On 24.07.19 08:17, Marc Haber wrote: > Do we have a build technology that uses containers instead of chroots

Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos

2019-10-05 Thread Holger Levsen
On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 07:03:06PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > I'm wondering if there is something Debian can do to be even more > successful in the container world. Like regular releases of a container > base image from testing. The amount of packages that needed for that is

Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos

2019-10-05 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
ase image for their containers. For that, developers also need or want the latest shiniest software - which is something a distribution can't provide. RedHat realized that and is providing their Universal Base Image now, which can be freely shared in container images. I'm wondering if there is something D

Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos

2019-10-05 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Bernd Zeimetz writes: > On 10/5/19 3:31 AM, Paul Wise wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 10:49 PM Enrico Weigelt wrote: >>> On 24.07.19 08:17, Marc Haber wrote: >>> Do we have a build technology that uses containers instead of chroots yet? >>> AFAIK sbuild has had this support for a

Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos

2019-10-05 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
ildpackage ? > > AFAICT, docker-buildpackage doesn't exist but whalebuilder does. https://github.com/metux/docker-buildpackage Having something that works with git-buildpackage would be really nice, though. Even better if it would allow to use the k8s API to build things... -- Bernd

Accepted debian-med 3.4 (source) into unstable

2019-10-05 Thread Andreas Tille
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2019 12:02:38 +0200 Source: debian-med Architecture: source Version: 3.4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Med Packaging Team Changed-By: Andreas Tille Changes: debian-med (3.4) unstable

Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos

2019-10-04 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 10:49 PM Enrico Weigelt wrote: > On 24.07.19 08:17, Marc Haber wrote: > > > Do we have a build technology that uses containers instead of chroots > > yet? > > Something like docker-buildpackage ? AFAICT, docker-buildpackage doesn't exist but whalebuilder does. For

Re: Maintainer/home wanted for DDE (Debian Data Export / dde.debian.net)

2019-10-04 Thread lalusudiarto.bakers09
Dikirim dari ponsel cerdas Samsung Galaxy saya.

Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos

2019-10-04 Thread Jose-Luis Rivas
which is a pretty straight-forward way to build debian packages, it's a simple bash script that only requires bash and docker in your system in order to build the packages. https://github.com/resnullius/deb-build-pkg/blob/master/deb-build-pkg -- __.https://wiki.debian.org/JoseLuis

Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos

2019-10-04 Thread Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
On 24.07.19 08:17, Marc Haber wrote: > Do we have a build technology that uses containers instead of chroots > yet? Something like docker-buildpackage ? --mtx -- Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult Free software and Linux embedded engineering i...@metux.net -- +49-151-27565287

Accepted debian-policy 4.4.1.1 (source) into unstable

2019-10-03 Thread Sean Whitton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 07:29:56 -0700 Source: debian-policy Architecture: source Version: 4.4.1.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Policy Editors Changed-By: Sean Whitton Closes: 941475 Changes: debian-policy

Accepted debian-edu 2.11.3 (source) into unstable

2019-10-03 Thread Holger Levsen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 09:02:04 +0100 Source: debian-edu Architecture: source Version: 2.11.3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Edu Developers Changed-By: Holger Levsen Changes: debian-edu (2.11.3) unstable

Accepted debian-edu-config 2.11.3 (source) into unstable

2019-10-03 Thread Holger Levsen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 08:15:19 +0100 Source: debian-edu-config Architecture: source Version: 2.11.3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Edu Developers Changed-By: Holger Levsen Closes: 941574 Changes: debian-edu

Accepted debian-faq 10.1 (source) into unstable

2019-10-02 Thread Dr. Tobias Quathamer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2019 14:21:30 +0200 Source: debian-faq Architecture: source Version: 10.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Peña Changed-By: Dr. Tobias Quathamer Changes: debian-faq (10.1

Accepted debian-science 1.11 (source) into unstable

2019-10-01 Thread Andreas Tille
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 11:53:08 +0200 Source: debian-science Binary: science-tasks science-electronics science-config science-all science-biology science-chemistry science-dataacquisition science-dataacquisition-dev science

Re: Debian Policy 4.4.1.0 released

2019-09-30 Thread Simon McVittie
where the upstream software is released (either where you can download tarball releases, or a VCS repository). The Vcs-* is where the Debian packaging is maintained. For a real-world example, compare these repositories for ostree: Source: https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/ Vcs-Git: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/ostree.git smcv

Re: Debian Policy 4.4.1.0 released

2019-09-30 Thread Steffen Möller
Hello, On 29.09.19 20:16, Sean Whitton wrote: Here are the significant normative changes from the previously announced release of Policy (4.4.0): 5.6.26 A package control file must not have more than one ``Vcs-`` field. where type != "browser"? If the package is maintained in

Accepted debian-policy 4.4.1.0 (source) into unstable

2019-09-29 Thread Sean Whitton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2019 11:11:49 -0700 Source: debian-policy Architecture: source Version: 4.4.1.0 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Policy Editors Changed-By: Sean Whitton Closes: 688481 910783 919507 931975

Accepted debian-edu-config 2.11.2 (source) into unstable

2019-09-28 Thread Holger Levsen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 13:04:00 +0100 Source: debian-edu-config Architecture: source Version: 2.11.2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Edu Developers Changed-By: Holger Levsen Changes: debian-edu-config (2.11.2

Accepted gitaly 1.47.3+debian-1 (source amd64) into experimental

2019-09-27 Thread Sruthi Chandran
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 17:13:01 +0530 Source: gitaly Binary: gitaly gitaly-dbgsym Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.47.3+debian-1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Go Packaging Team Changed-By: Sruthi

Debian Buster update error

2019-09-26 Thread CSO
returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: linux-image-4.19.0-6-amd64 E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Any ideas how to solve it? When installing and setting up debian, I use all default setting with whole disk encryption. So, since

Accepted calamares-settings-debian 11.0.1-1 (source) into unstable

2019-09-25 Thread Jonathan Carter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 10:36:54 + Source: calamares-settings-debian Architecture: source Version: 11.0.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Jonathan Carter Changed-By: Jonathan Carter Changes: calamares-settings

Accepted debian-keyring 2019.09.24 (source) into unstable

2019-09-24 Thread Jonathan McDowell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 19:20:00 +0100 Source: debian-keyring Architecture: source Version: 2019.09.24 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Keyring Maintainers Changed-By: Jonathan McDowell Changes: debian-keyring

Accepted xdaliclock 2.44+debian-2 (source) into unstable

2019-09-24 Thread Kartik Mistry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 07:54:33 +0530 Source: xdaliclock Architecture: source Version: 2.44+debian-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Kartik Mistry Changed-By: Kartik Mistry Closes: 941035 Changes: xdaliclock (2.44

Accepted debian-faq 10.0 (source all) into unstable, unstable

2019-09-23 Thread Dr. Tobias Quathamer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 23:02:07 +0200 Source: debian-faq Binary: debian-faq debian-faq-de debian-faq-fr debian-faq-it debian-faq-ja debian-faq-nl debian-faq-ru debian-faq-zh-cn Architecture: source all Version: 10.0 Distribution

Bug#940881: RFH: freedombox -- debian pure blend, user-friendly, privacy-oriented home server

2019-09-21 Thread James Valleroy
development matters, FreedomBox has many wish-list items which our small team can't always make time for. We need help from our friends in Debian! Although there are only a few bugs open in BTS, there are over 300 listed in the Salsa issue tracker: https://salsa.debian.org/freedombox-team/plinth

Accepted debian-edu-config 2.11.1 (source) into unstable

2019-09-19 Thread Holger Levsen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 15:30:11 +0200 Source: debian-edu-config Architecture: source Version: 2.11.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Edu Developers Changed-By: Holger Levsen Closes: 872154 940698 Changes

Accepted xdaliclock 2.44+debian-1 (source) into unstable

2019-09-19 Thread Kartik Mistry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 13:44:25 +0400 Source: xdaliclock Architecture: source Version: 2.44+debian-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Kartik Mistry Changed-By: Kartik Mistry Changes: xdaliclock (2.44+debian-1) unstable

Re: should Debian add itself to https://python3statement.org ?

2019-09-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
ck with >> a new name after the python2 removal. But, it could happen if some >> people is willing to support and maintain... >> >> How should Debian react if someone submitted an ITP for python2 >> forks, such as the tauthon above? > >It would probably be handled just

Re: should Debian add itself to https://python3statement.org ?

2019-09-16 Thread Jonathan Carter
people is willing to support and maintain... > > How should Debian react if someone submitted an ITP for python2 > forks, such as the tauthon above? It would probably be handled just like any other piece of new software entering Debian. I can't speak for the entire Python team, but the Python

Re: should Debian add itself to https://python3statement.org ?

2019-09-14 Thread Drew Parsons
to me it would be in the spirit of the site to add Debian's pledge to remove Python2 (we are currently in the middle of doing just that). Is this a thing that we want to do as a project, to add Debian to https://python3statement.org/ ? Thanks all for the discussion. Looks like we don't have

Accepted puppet-module-debian-archvsync 0.1.11-2 (source) into unstable

2019-09-14 Thread Thomas Goirand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 23:06:01 +0200 Source: puppet-module-debian-archvsync Architecture: source Version: 0.1.11-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian OpenStack Changed-By: Thomas Goirand Closes: 937349 Changes

DNF for Debian

2019-09-13 Thread Mihai Moldovan
Hi I've packaged DNF for Debian and would like to find someone to take over these packages and maintain them as part of the distribution. I'm not a DD and while I believe the packages to be of reasonable if not high quality, I already have enough on my plate and know that I will not be able

Accepted debian-astro 2.1 (source) into unstable

2019-09-13 Thread Ole Streicher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 11:44:10 +0200 Source: debian-astro Architecture: source Version: 2.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Astro Team Changed-By: Ole Streicher Changes: debian-astro (2.1) unstable; urgency

Re: should Debian add itself to https://python3statement.org ?

2019-09-12 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 09:30:09AM -0700, Mo Zhou wrote: > How should Debian react if someone submitted an ITP for python2 > forks, such as the tauthon above? "Go ahead but don't interfere with other packages, including the Python 3 interpreter and the Python 3 modules, and we won

Re: should Debian add itself to https://python3statement.org ?

2019-09-12 Thread Mo Zhou
ort and maintain... How should Debian react if someone submitted an ITP for python2 forks, such as the tauthon above?

Re: should Debian add itself to https://python3statement.org ?

2019-09-12 Thread Marco d'Itri
ckages which have been abandoned by their upstream maintainers 20 years ago and they are fine. I am not a python users, but as long as somebody will continue to maintain it in Debian we have no reason to remove it no matter what the upstream maintainers would like. -- ciao, Marco signatu

Re: should Debian add itself to https://python3statement.org ?

2019-09-12 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On 12-09-2019 17:01, Ian Jackson wrote: > But we need to be clear what's going on and communicate early. Yes, not on the front page, but there is (first bullet): https://www.debian.org/releases/buster/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en.html#deprecated-components Paul signature.asc

Re: should Debian add itself to https://python3statement.org ?

2019-09-12 Thread Alf Gaida
, Jim" (Doctor Leonard McCoy) > I did some searching and found this > https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2019/07/msg00080.html > which is a sane-looking transition plan but doesn't seem to have a > timeframe and doesn't seem to contemplate removal of the actual > python2 inte

Re: should Debian add itself to https://python3statement.org ?

2019-09-12 Thread Matthias Klose
On 12.09.19 17:01, Ian Jackson wrote: Drew Parsons writes ("should Debian add itself to https://python3statement.org ?"): https://python3statement.org/ is a site documenting the projects which are supporting the policy of dropping Python2 to keep Python3 only. That statement is

Re: should Debian add itself to https://python3statement.org ?

2019-09-12 Thread Mo Zhou
ould be in the spirit of the site to add > Debian's pledge to remove Python2 (we are currently in the middle of > doing just that). > > Is this a thing that we want to do as a project, to add Debian to > https://python3statement.org/ ? > > Drew

Re: should Debian add itself to https://python3statement.org ?

2019-09-12 Thread Jim Popovitch
On Thu, 2019-09-12 at 16:14 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Jim Popovitch writes ("Re: should Debian add itself to > https://python3statement.org ?"): > > On Thu, 2019-09-12 at 16:01 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > > Drew Parsons writes ("should Debian add itself to

Re: should Debian add itself to https://python3statement.org ?

2019-09-12 Thread Ian Jackson
Jim Popovitch writes ("Re: should Debian add itself to https://python3statement.org ?"): > On Thu, 2019-09-12 at 16:01 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > Drew Parsons writes ("should Debian add itself to > > https://python3statement.org ?"): > > > https:/

Re: should Debian add itself to https://python3statement.org ?

2019-09-12 Thread Jim Popovitch
On Thu, 2019-09-12 at 16:01 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Drew Parsons writes ("should Debian add itself to > https://python3statement.org ?"): > > https://python3statement.org/ is a site documenting the projects which > > are supporting the policy of dropping

Re: should Debian add itself to https://python3statement.org ?

2019-09-12 Thread Ian Jackson
Drew Parsons writes ("should Debian add itself to https://python3statement.org ?"): > https://python3statement.org/ is a site documenting the projects which > are supporting the policy of dropping Python2 to keep Python3 only. That statement is a *pledge* to drop support for py

should Debian add itself to https://python3statement.org ?

2019-09-12 Thread Drew Parsons
of the site to add Debian's pledge to remove Python2 (we are currently in the middle of doing just that). Is this a thing that we want to do as a project, to add Debian to https://python3statement.org/ ? Drew

Accepted debian-gis 0.0.18 (source) into unstable

2019-09-08 Thread Bas Couwenberg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2019 08:26:06 +0200 Source: debian-gis Architecture: source Version: 0.0.18 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian GIS Project Changed-By: Bas Couwenberg Closes: 939716 Changes: debian-gis (0.0.18

Accepted breezy-debian 2.8.30 (source) into unstable

2019-09-04 Thread Jelmer Vernooij
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2019 02:31:54 + Source: breezy-debian Architecture: source Version: 2.8.30 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Bazaar Maintainers Changed-By: Jelmer Vernooij Changes: breezy-debian (2.8.30

Accepted puppet-module-debian-archvsync 0.1.11-1 (source) into unstable

2019-09-03 Thread Thomas Goirand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2019 08:56:11 +0200 Source: puppet-module-debian-archvsync Architecture: source Version: 0.1.11-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian OpenStack Changed-By: Thomas Goirand Changes: puppet-module

Accepted puppet-module-debian-archvsync 0.1.10-1 (source) into unstable

2019-09-02 Thread Thomas Goirand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2019 15:48:53 +0200 Source: puppet-module-debian-archvsync Architecture: source Version: 0.1.10-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian OpenStack Changed-By: Thomas Goirand Changes: puppet-module

Accepted python-debian 0.1.36 (source) into unstable

2019-09-01 Thread Stuart Prescott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2019 23:50:42 +1000 Source: python-debian Architecture: source Version: 0.1.36 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian python-debian Maintainers Changed-By: Stuart Prescott Changes: python-debian

Accepted debian-parl 1.9.20 (source) into unstable

2019-08-31 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2019 21:39:06 +0200 Source: debian-parl Architecture: source Version: 1.9.20 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: DebianParl team Changed-By: Jonas Smedegaard Closes: 935954 Changes: debian-parl (1.9.20

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >