Hi,
On Montag, 6. Januar 2014, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I disagree that we should have *rules* because, given the social
> context, I find it important to leave space to adapt to each case.
there are (and/or can be) soft rules too, which allow exactly that.
just saying,
Holger
signatur
Le Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 04:47:46PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
>
> I think that it would make more sense if a current member of the release team
> filed that bug on behalf of the release team.
I agree and need to say that I am surprised to read so many emails complaining
for the release team,
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 06:46:02PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> Looking into the d-d-a archives, I find something about NMUs during
> BSPs in May 2007 (<20070513172244.ga14...@solar.ftbfs.de>) for the
> last time, and then (and since then, e.g.
> <47ccf6ce.7050...@debian.org> in March 2008) the
On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 12:26:14 -0500
Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 7:59 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Lucas Nussbaum writes ("Re: Delegation for the Release Team"):
> >> On 06/01/14 at 11:56 +, Neil McGovern wrote:
> >> > Explicitly aga
On Mon, 06 Jan 2014 15:24:40 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
FWIW, I have no strong opinion if something about NMU rules should be
in the RT delegation; just adding some experiences / data points:
> > Do you see a problem with the current NMU recommended practices, that
> > you would like to fix? [...
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 7:59 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum writes ("Re: Delegation for the Release Team"):
>> On 06/01/14 at 11:56 +, Neil McGovern wrote:
>> > Explicitly again: Please see the last 7 years worth of bits mails, where
>> > the r
On 06/01/14 at 15:24 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum writes ("Re: Delegation for the Release Team"):
> > Also, I'm surprised that you didn't comment on the last part of my mail.
>
> (Regarding the TC.) Well, of course I'm on the TC and the TC h
Lucas Nussbaum writes ("Re: Delegation for the Release Team"):
> On 06/01/14 at 12:59 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Given Lucas's attitude, I would like to suggest to the release team
> > that they file a bug against the the Developers' Reference, containi
On 06/01/14 at 12:59 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum writes ("Re: Delegation for the Release Team"):
> > On 06/01/14 at 11:56 +, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > > Explicitly again: Please see the last 7 years worth of bits mails, where
> > > the r
Lucas Nussbaum writes ("Re: Delegation for the Release Team"):
> On 06/01/14 at 11:56 +, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > Explicitly again: Please see the last 7 years worth of bits mails, where
> > the release team have lowered this without advance notice, for BSPs etc.
..
Hi,
On 06/01/14 at 11:56 +, Neil McGovern wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 01:23:42PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> >
> > I'd like to note that the discussion on this delegation was inconclusive
> > on a couple of points:
> >
> > 1) it does not include anything about defining rules for NMU
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 01:23:42PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> I'd like to note that the discussion on this delegation was inconclusive
> on a couple of points:
>
> 1) it does not include anything about defining rules for NMU delays.
>
> The last time the NMU "policy" was changed was in 201
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/26/2013 09:35 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 09:02 -0500, The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> It's seemed intuitively obvious to me that a "release goal" could
>> equally be defined as "a new criterion by which a package can be
>> ju
On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 09:02 -0500, The Wanderer wrote:
> It's seemed intuitively obvious to me that a "release goal" could
> equally be defined as "a new criterion by which a package can be judged
> to be RC-buggy".
One of the defining points of release goals (at least as they've
historically exis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/26/2013 07:23 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 26/12/13 at 13:20 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
>> Dear Developers,
>>
>> It is my great pleasure and honor to officialize the existence and
>> the powers of one of Debian's most important teams:
On 26/12/13 at 13:20 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Dear Developers,
>
> It is my great pleasure and honor to officialize the existence and the
> powers of one of Debian's most important teams: the Release Team.
Hi,
I'd like to note that the discussion on this delegation was inconclusive
on a co
16 matches
Mail list logo
