Re: GNUPLOT breaks GPL

1998-06-18 Thread tibor simko
eb == Edward Betts [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: gm == Gergely Madarasz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: jt == James Troup [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: eb GNUPLOT is not GPL, so it can not be linked with eb libreadline. I am I right or drastically mistaken. (I must eb point out that while I am

GNUPLOT breaks GPL

1998-06-17 Thread Edward Betts
15:37:30 $ ldd `which gnuplot` libvga.so.1 = /usr/lib/libc5-compat/libvga.so.1 (0x4000c000) libreadline.so.2 = /lib/libc5-compat/libreadline.so.2 (0x40048000) libm.so.5 = /lib/libm.so.5 (0x4006a000) libc.so.5 = /lib/libc.so.5 (0x40073000) libncurses.so.3.0 =

Re: GNUPLOT breaks GPL

1998-06-17 Thread Gergely Madarasz
On Wed, 17 Jun 1998, Edward Betts wrote: * Permission to modify the software is granted, but not the right to * distribute the modified code. Modifications are to be distributed * as patches to released version. Ahem... it looks like gnuplot falls in the same category as pine and qmail...

Re: GNUPLOT breaks GPL

1998-06-17 Thread Gergely Madarasz
On Wed, 17 Jun 1998, Gergely Madarasz wrote: On Wed, 17 Jun 1998, Edward Betts wrote: * Permission to modify the software is granted, but not the right to * distribute the modified code. Modifications are to be distributed * as patches to released version. Ahem... it looks like