What purpose is served by the existence of kde (the metapackage)?
kde is the package which administrators who want to try KDE should
generally install.
Is there a reason why not to clarify its meaning by renaming it as
'kde-full'
kde doesn't depend on the full KDE (for example, it doesn't de
On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 22:11 +0100, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 08:33:55PM +0200, Omer Zak wrote:
> > My wish is that modularization of Debian packages be improved. It means
> > that it'll be possible to uninstall all games in a PC and continue to
> > have functioning KDE. Likewi
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 6:11 AM, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> kde is a metapackage that includes _all_ KDE that is not related to
> development. If you just want a functional KDE without games and related
> stuff look at kde-core. Then you can install what you want else using the
> modules
> metapackag
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 08:33:55PM +0200, Omer Zak wrote:
> At the encouragement of Luk Claes, I would like to raise this subject in
> the general mailing list.
>
> It has been my impression that when using aptitude and requesting to
> install/upgrade desktops (KDE, maybe also Gnome), several othe
hi,
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 08:33:55PM +0200, Omer Zak wrote:
> My wish is that modularization of Debian packages be improved. It means
> that it'll be possible to uninstall all games in a PC and continue to
> have functioning KDE. Likewise - TeX.
in cases where it can function without the extr
At the encouragement of Luk Claes, I would like to raise this subject in
the general mailing list.
It has been my impression that when using aptitude and requesting to
install/upgrade desktops (KDE, maybe also Gnome), several other
packages, which don't interest me, are installed as well. They ca
6 matches
Mail list logo
