Re: How mature is Pkg-format 3.0 (git), yet?

2012-01-18 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Thijs Kinkhorst th...@debian.org writes: On Mon, January 16, 2012 23:26, Paul Wise wrote: I just wanted to ask how mature Package-format 3.0 (git) became until now. It is not currently accepted by the Debian archive: http://bugs.debian.org/642801 My experience until now is that it's

Re: How mature is Pkg-format 3.0 (git), yet?

2012-01-17 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Mon, January 16, 2012 23:26, Paul Wise wrote: I just wanted to ask how mature Package-format 3.0 (git) became until now. It is not currently accepted by the Debian archive: http://bugs.debian.org/642801 My experience until now is that it's mature in dpkg. It does the job just like other

How mature is Pkg-format 3.0 (git), yet?

2012-01-16 Thread Björn Esser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi there! I just wanted to ask how mature Package-format 3.0 (git) became until now. BR, Björn. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

Re: How mature is Pkg-format 3.0 (git), yet?

2012-01-16 Thread Paul Wise
2012/1/17 Björn Esser: I just wanted to ask how mature Package-format 3.0 (git) became until now. It is not currently accepted by the Debian archive: http://bugs.debian.org/642801 -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to