Em 16-04-2018 17:16, Helmut Grohne escreveu:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 04:14:21PM -0300, Herbert Fortes wrote:
>> Package python3-dj-static is on the dd-list. But I can import it.
>>
>> # on a bananapi
>>
>> $ python3
>> Python 3.5.3 (default, Jan 19 2017, 14:11:04)
>> [GCC 6.3.0 20170124] on
>
> In my initial mail there is a draft.gz that contains the proposed bug
> reports. Searching for python3-dj-static yields:
>
> | After installing python3-dj-static importing the module dj_static
> | into a python interpreter fails with the following error:
> |
> | Traceback (most recent call
On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 10:45:29 AM Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 5:00 AM, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > The difficult one is deriving the module name from the list of files.
>
> It should be just reading top_level.txt from the egg-info directory?
For packages that use setuptools,
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 5:00 AM, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> The difficult one is deriving the module name from the list of files.
It should be just reading top_level.txt from the egg-info directory?
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 12:00:24PM +0200, Ondrej Novy wrote:
> I tried to do my best :)
>
> https://sources.debian.org/src/autodep8/0.11.1/support/python/generate/
>
> Feel free to add more "magic" for module name detection.
There is an easy improvement and a difficult one I can propose.
The
Hi
On 16-04-18 12:03, Ondrej Novy wrote:
> I think it's good idea to mass commit this (adding Testsuite:
> autopkgtest-pkg-python) into Git repos. We should probably merge this
> list with Debian CI whitelist one.
I assume you mean you want to mass commit the packages that are
currently on the
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 04:14:21PM -0300, Herbert Fortes wrote:
> Package python3-dj-static is on the dd-list. But I can import it.
>
> # on a bananapi
>
> $ python3
> Python 3.5.3 (default, Jan 19 2017, 14:11:04)
> [GCC 6.3.0 20170124] on linux
> Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 01:44:48PM +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [Helmut Grohne, 2018-04-15]
> > Piotr Ożarowski
> >python-changelog (U)
> >python-sphinx-paramlinks (U)
> >python3-changelog (U)
> >python3-sphinx-paramlinks (U)
>
> These packages provide sphinx
On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 at 16:14:21 -0300, Herbert Fortes wrote:
> Package python3-dj-static is on the dd-list. But I can import it.
...
> The package name uses '-' and the module '_'.
I think this is a false positive in the preparation of the dd-list.
/usr/share/autodep8/support/python/generate
Hi,
Em 15-04-2018 15:56, Helmut Grohne escreveu:
> Hi,
>
> I was surprised to find a python module that failed to import thinking
> that our qa would catch this. So I wondered how many other python
> modules would fail to import and started a little yak shaving journey.
>
> It turns that this
Hi,
Quoting Adam Borowski (2018-04-15 22:30:47)
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 09:45:45PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 09:38:27PM +0200, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> > > The src:file package doesn't ship python{,3}-magic any longer, the change
> > > was two months ago. Mind to
[Helmut Grohne, 2018-04-15]
> Piotr Ożarowski
>python-changelog (U)
>python-sphinx-paramlinks (U)
>python3-changelog (U)
>python3-sphinx-paramlinks (U)
These packages provide sphinx plugins and have Enhances: python{,3}-sphinx
Missing module is available after
Hi Ondrej,
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 11:58:17AM +0200, Ondrej Novy wrote:
>
> sry. I only removed useless Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg in git.
>
> Checking if d/tests already exists before adding autopkgtest-pkg-python is
> really important. You can add autopkgtest-pkg-python even if there is
>
Hi,
2018-04-15 21:27 GMT+02:00 Helmut Grohne :
> Note that autopkgtest-pkg-python is only applicable when the module name
> matches the package name. That's true for the majority of packages, but
> not for all (e.g. capitalization). Nevertheless, a lot of packages are
>
Hi,
2018-04-15 21:32 GMT+02:00 Mattia Rizzolo :
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 09:27:30PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > Note that autopkgtest-pkg-python is only applicable when the module name
> > matches the package name. That's true for the majority of packages, but
> > not for
Hi,
2018-04-16 11:56 GMT+02:00 Ondrej Novy :
> already done in git.
>
sry. I only removed useless Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg in git.
Checking if d/tests already exists before adding autopkgtest-pkg-python is
really important. You can add autopkgtest-pkg-python even if there is
Hi,
2018-04-16 11:47 GMT+02:00 Andreas Tille :
>
> W: python-csb source: unnecessary-testsuite-autopkgtest-field
> ...
> So before doing a MBF "Missing Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-python"
> this should be checked as well.
>
already done in git.
--
Best regards
Ondřej Nový
Hi Helmut,
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 09:27:30PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > For more information: https://wiki.debian.org/Python/LibraryStyleGuide
>
> Note that autopkgtest-pkg-python is only applicable when the module name
> matches the package name. That's true for the majority of packages,
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 09:45:45PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 09:38:27PM +0200, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> > > Christoph Biedl
> > >file
> >
> > The src:file package doesn't ship python{,3}-magic any longer, the
> > change was two
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 09:38:27PM +0200, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> > Christoph Biedl
> >file
>
> The src:file package doesn't ship python{,3}-magic any longer, the
> change was two months ago. Mind to check how file got on this list?
I used "apt-cache showsrc
Helmut Grohne wrote...
> Note that autopkgtest-pkg-python is only applicable when the module name
> matches the package name. That's true for the majority of packages, but
> not for all (e.g. capitalization). Nevertheless, a lot of packages are
> missing the flag. Since I have the data at hand, I
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 09:27:30PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 09:08:55PM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > BTW, last I heard from terceiro about this, I understood that whitelist
> > is a workaround and packages are expected to add
> > Testsuite:
On Sunday, April 15, 2018 09:08:55 PM Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 08:56:34PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > Actually, there is autodep8 at ci.debian.net testing this already. It
> > has a whitelist
> > (https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/debian-ci-config/blob/master/cookbooks/d
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 09:08:55PM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> BTW, last I heard from terceiro about this, I understood that whitelist
> is a workaround and packages are expected to add
> Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-python
> to their d/control.
>
> For more information:
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 08:56:34PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Actually, there is autodep8 at ci.debian.net testing this already. It
> has a whitelist
> (https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/debian-ci-config/blob/master/cookbooks/debci/files/default/whitelist-python.txt)
> of around 800 packages
Hi,
I was surprised to find a python module that failed to import thinking
that our qa would catch this. So I wondered how many other python
modules would fail to import and started a little yak shaving journey.
It turns that this happens for 251 python modules. Since failure to
import the main
26 matches
Mail list logo