Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes:
On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 17:45 +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org wrote:
In particular, I filed a bug against dpkg requesting that it produce
more informative error messages in these
* Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk [120613 23:56]:
On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 12:47 +0100, Wookey wrote:
I added a user-oriented HOWTO to the multiarch doc-collection last
month as there seemed to be a shortage of such docs to point to that
weren't cryptic specifications, or talking mostly
Andreas Barth a...@ayous.org writes:
* David Kalnischkies (kalnischk...@gmail.com) [120612 18:03]:
You need to upgrade to support MultiArch,
but you need MultiArch to upgradeâ¦
(beside, how would the detection for such a message look like?)
We had discussed to export foreign-arch packages
On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 17:45 +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org wrote:
In particular, I filed a bug against dpkg requesting that it produce
more informative error messages in these cases [0], but I wonder if a
part of the
+++ Ben Hutchings [2012-06-13 12:24 +0100]:
On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 17:45 +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org
wrote:
In particular, I filed a bug against dpkg requesting that it produce
more informative error messages in
On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 12:47 +0100, Wookey wrote:
+++ Ben Hutchings [2012-06-13 12:24 +0100]:
On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 17:45 +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org
wrote:
In particular, I filed a bug against dpkg requesting
Hi Mike,
On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:40:59 -0400, Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org
wrote:
We've been getting a few bug reports from users attempting to install
multiarch wine who have yet to manually enable multiarch itself.
Obviously that is a failure on their part, and is easily correctable.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:45 AM, David Kalnischkies wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
In particular, I filed a bug against dpkg requesting that it produce
more informative error messages in these cases [0], but I wonder if a
part of the solution shouldn't be
Michael,
am Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:57:12PM -0400 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
A squeeze-proposed-update could help that along, right?
no, we don't generally require people to update to the latest stable to upgrade
to the next stable version.
Also depending on the solution it might also not
* David Kalnischkies (kalnischk...@gmail.com) [120612 18:03]:
You need to upgrade to support MultiArch,
but you need MultiArch to upgrade…
(beside, how would the detection for such a message look like?)
We had discussed to export foreign-arch packages to the arches
packages files at debconf.
Hi,
We've been getting a few bug reports from users attempting to install
multiarch wine who have yet to manually enable multiarch itself.
Obviously that is a failure on their part, and is easily correctable.
However, I wonder if we can't make such migrations a bit more
straightforward?
In
On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 15:40 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Also, limitations in the existing testing migration tools are making
wine not considered for wheezy, since those tools don't check whether
dependencies for 'Multi-Arch: allowed' packages are satisfied by
packages on other architectures.
12 matches
Mail list logo