On 29/04/08 at 11:54 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
FWIW, I think NMUing a package shouldn't end up with a sourceful upload
but should instead have a .diff.gz, whether it's a native package or not.
When NMUing a native package, which problem would it add to upload a
source package with a single
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 10:17:12PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
I'd be very unhappy about that. For one, I think using such suffix in a
field that forms part of users' everyday's life is, uhm, inappropriate
or disruptive. What do they care if the version is a NMU or not?
Hu? And +dfsg is
On Tuesday 29 Apr 2008 3:02:34 pm Amaya wrote:
The version must be the version of the last upload, plus +nmuX, where
X is a counter starting at 1.
I have found that NMUing native source packages is a bit tricky, as in,
what is the consensuous regarding this increment? Where to increment?
James Vega wrote:
The version must be the version of the last upload, plus +nmuX, where
X is a counter starting at 1.
I have found that NMUing native source packages is a bit tricky, as in,
what is the consensuous regarding this increment? Where to increment?
I hope I made myself understood,
* Mike Hommey [Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:54:59 +0200]:
FWIW, I think NMUing a package shouldn't end up with a sourceful upload
but should instead have a .diff.gz, whether it's a native package or not.
100% agreed. (Assuming you mean a NMU should never, ever, create a new
tarball, particularly
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:16:28PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
FWIW, I think NMUing a package shouldn't end up with a sourceful upload
but should instead have a .diff.gz, whether it's a native package or not.
100% agreed. (Assuming you mean a NMU should never, ever, create a new
tarball,
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:16:28PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Mike Hommey [Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:54:59 +0200]:
FWIW, I think NMUing a package shouldn't end up with a sourceful upload
but should instead have a .diff.gz, whether it's a native package or not.
100% agreed. (Assuming you mean a
Kartik Mistry wrote:
someversion+nmu1, someversion+nmu2 for example see, bzflag package. It
is at 2.0.10.20071115+nmu1 right now.
Thanks, that answers my question.
--
·''`. Come, let me sing into your ear, those dancing days are gone
: :' : I carry the sun in a golden cup, the moon
* Bastian Blank [Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:55:23 +0200]:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:16:28PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Mike Hommey [Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:54:59 +0200]:
FWIW, I think NMUing a package shouldn't end up with a sourceful upload
but should instead have a .diff.gz, whether it's a
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 01:01:53PM +0200, Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
* Bastian Blank [Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:55:23 +0200]:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:16:28PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Mike Hommey [Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:54:59 +0200]:
FWIW, I think NMUing a package shouldn't
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Adeodato Simó wrote:
I want a consistent versioning scheme, thus +nmuX for both native and
non-natives packages.
I'd be very unhappy about that. For one, I think using such suffix in a
field that forms part of users' everyday's life is, uhm, inappropriate
or
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 09:42:59PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
This DEP is available on the Debian Wiki[1].
The version must be the version of the last upload, plus +nmuX, where X is a
counter starting at 1.
The above was added to the DEP to match dch but dch only uses that format
for native NMUs
(reply-to set to debian-devel only)
On Fri, 25 Apr 2008, James Vega wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 09:42:59PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
This DEP is available on the Debian Wiki[1].
The version must be the version of the last upload, plus +nmuX, where X is a
counter starting at 1.
The
Raphael Hertzog wrote, Friday, April 25, 2008 3:16 PM
On Fri, 25 Apr 2008, James Vega wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 09:42:59PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
This DEP is available on the Debian Wiki[1].
The version must be the version of the last upload, plus +nmuX, where X
is a
counter starting
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I want a consistent versioning scheme, thus +nmuX for both native and
non-natives packages.
Consider this a wishlist bug against devscripts. :-)
And the Developer's Reference.
I do recommend actually filing said wishlist bugs, of course. :)
--
15 matches
Mail list logo
