Re: Needed input from Australian users and developers:; choosing timezones for Australia in D-I

2011-03-25 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
 Hello,
 
 I need some help from Australian people.

I finally settled for listing states. That seems to be the most
unnderstandable option (including for foreigners who happen to arrive
in AU).


This will also be consistent with some other countries where I intend
to do the same (done for Brazil for instance and I'm thinking about it
for federal countriel such as Argentina where last minute changes in
DST choices often tend to create more and more timezones (indeed
tzdata entries).

Listing states also has an advantage: I can reuse translations from
iso-codes (countries subdivisions are included in the package as
iso-3166-2).




-- 




signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Needed input from Australian users and developers:; choosing timezones for Australia in D-I

2011-03-24 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:59:19PM +1100, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
 Commonwealth Games. In Victoria we were on a different timezone to that
 of the folks in New South Wales.

Not really relevant, but no we weren't. NSW changed too.


Hamish


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110324234259.gb32...@risingsoftware.com



Re: Needed input from Australian users and developers:; choosing timezones for Australia in D-I

2011-03-24 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:28:18PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
 Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org writes:
  That's indeed insane..:-). Hobart (Tasmania), Melbourne (Victoria),
  Sydney (NSW) and Canberra (ACT) have the *exact* same time rules
  (including DST).
 
 But they didn't always; and with the tendency of governments to flex
 their arbitrary timezone powers, they may be different again in future.

Indeed, Vic and NSW only aligned themselves with Tasmania a few years
back. Tasmania had longer daylight savings periods for years before.
It's feasible that it will differ again in the future.

I think Vic/ACT/NSW discrepancies are unlikely but it doesn't seem worth
removing them to me.



Hamish


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110324234114.ga32...@risingsoftware.com



Re: Needed input from Australian users and developers:; choosing timezones for Australia in D-I

2011-03-23 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Paul Wise (p...@debian.org):
 I agree with the other Australians in the thread; the east-coast
 timezones are currently all the same but might not be in the future so
 we shouldn't rely on them being the same and we should allow selection
 of Australia/Sydney vs Australia/Melbourne.

Sure. That was an option I was considering, too.

I'm just not fond of Australia/Sydney presented as a choice, I'd
rather have New South-Wales.

Given that the map idea is great...but just an idea which I certainly
am unable to implement, and that I have to deal with what we have
*now*, I hereby propose selecting states:

 New South-Wales
 Victoria
 Australian Capital Territory
 Queensland
 Tasmania
 South Australia
 Northern Territory
 Western Australia
 Eyre Highway
 Yancowinna county
 Lord Howe Island

I will probably propose the same for some federal countries where
timzeone and DST rules are set by states/provinces: Brazil and
Argentina come to mind (Russia is too complicated for this to be a
sane option). So could Mexico.

USA and Canada are a fairly different case: the overall use of
Atlantic/Eastern/Central/Moutain/Pacific is quite well known among the
countries. We may just need to deal with specific exception (Navajo
nation not following DST, the Indiana nightmare, etc.)

I'll open separate thread for each country to avoid something too
messy.




signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Needed input from Australian users and developers:; choosing timezones for Australia in D-I

2011-03-23 Thread Rick Thomas


On Mar 23, 2011, at 2:15 AM, Christian PERRIER wrote:


I'm just not fond of Australia/Sydney presented as a choice, I'd
rather have New South-Wales.



For what it's worth, the timezone database (as evidenced by, among  
other things, the output of the tzselect command) is organized  
mostly in terms of country/city rather than country/larger- 
geographical-area.


Which is not to say that the larger geographical areas get completely  
short-shrift in the timezone database.  Look at the directory  
structure under /usr/share/zoneinfo for example.


As I understand it, the choice of a large city in the affected  
geographic area is practical in two ways:


1) Individual cities are fairly unlikely to be split into two or more  
timezones.  Larger geographical units are more likely to be split than  
individual cities -- all depending on unpredictable future political  
squabbles.


2) Most people know what their nearest large city is.  They may not  
know the fine distinctions of past and present political divisions as  
applied to timezones as applied to their present location.



Just one point of view from somebody who occasionally lurks on the  
tz mailing list.


Enjoy!

Rick


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/0ef9eef7-c2e0-4767-be44-846fed53d...@pobox.com



Re: Needed input from Australian users and developers:; choosing timezones for Australia in D-I

2011-03-23 Thread Karl Goetz
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 10:18:04 +0800
Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:

 this would only work for g-i not the text-based installer. The
 text-based installer could use the GNOME strategy of providing a
 search box to input your city/country and a list of possibly
 corresponding timezones/locales.

Would you remove the 'country' question from d-i? else the timezone
option would then be asking you for redundant information.
kk

-- 
Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS)
Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer
http://www.kgoetz.id.au
No, I won't join your social networking group


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: Needed input from Australian users and developers:; choosing timezones for Australia in D-I

2011-03-23 Thread Karl Goetz
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 07:15:20 +0100
Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org wrote:

 Quoting Paul Wise (p...@debian.org):
  I agree with the other Australians in the thread; the east-coast
  timezones are currently all the same but might not be in the future
  so we shouldn't rely on them being the same and we should allow
  selection of Australia/Sydney vs Australia/Melbourne.
 
 Sure. That was an option I was considering, too.
 
 I'm just not fond of Australia/Sydney presented as a choice, I'd
 rather have New South-Wales.

Is there a particular reason for this? (Perhaps consistency, guessing
by the rest of your post?)

 Given that the map idea is great...but just an idea which I certainly
 am unable to implement, and that I have to deal with what we have
 *now*, I hereby propose selecting states:
 
  New South-Wales

No hyphen in nsw ( http://www.nsw.gov.au/ )

  Victoria
  Australian Capital Territory
  Queensland
  Tasmania
  South Australia
  Northern Territory
  Western Australia
  Eyre Highway
  Yancowinna county
  Lord Howe Island

That would work, but practically its not changing a great deal from the
current setup.
thanks,
kk

-- 
Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS)
Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer
http://www.kgoetz.id.au
No, I won't join your social networking group


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: Needed input from Australian users and developers:; choosing timezones for Australia in D-I

2011-03-23 Thread Karl Goetz
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 12:28:18 +1100
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:

 Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org writes:
 
  The timezone choice in D-I is supposed to be user-friendly and easy
  to understand for the average citizen of the said country.
 
 FWIW: the existing Australian timezone choice in D-I seems fine from
 the point of view of the Australians I've seen do installs (including
 myself).

I'll agree with that - of all the parts of the installer that i've seen
people step through, timezones is one that they haven't needed help
with.

  When it comes at Australia, the choice was, up to now:
 

[14 options]

 
  That's indeed insane..:-). Hobart (Tasmania), Melbourne (Victoria),
  Sydney (NSW) and Canberra (ACT) have the *exact* same time rules
  (including DST).

There might be 14 options, but its always clear which one you want.
(the capital for your state/territory or a 'special' timezone). is
there a reason you feel its insane?

  I currently propose to offer the following choices in D-I:
 
   Victoria, ACT, NSW, Tasmania (Eastern Time, DST)
   Queensland (Eastern Time, no DST)
   South Australia (Central Time, DST)
   Northern Territory (Central Time, no DST)
   Western Australia (Western Time)
   Central Western Standard Time (Eucla)
   Lord Howe Island
 
  Do you guys think this would be understandable to the average
  Australian?
 
 Yes. However, please ensure that no-one working on this gets the
 impression this reduction in options is to be relied on; it's at the
 whim of government that demonstrates frequent whimsy in adding as well
 as reducing options.

I was wondering - is the trimming to somehow benefit the d-i people, or
those installing debian?
I'm not sure the suggested system makes it any more obvious to people
then the existing one.

For most (all?) Australian states the capital is at least 50% of the
population [1]. People know which capital is theirs, and there is a
good chance they are in it.

[1] Adelaide has 90%+ of the states population within 50km of the cbd

  An alternative was:

Please skip this alternative :)
kk

-- 
Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS)
Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer
http://www.kgoetz.id.au
No, I won't join your social networking group


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: Needed input from Australian users and developers:; choosing timezones for Australia in D-I

2011-03-23 Thread Joey Hess
Rick Thomas wrote:
 For what it's worth, the timezone database (as evidenced by, among
 other things, the output of the tzselect command) is organized
 mostly in terms of country/city rather than country/larger-
 geographical-area.

This is also largely misunderstood, as often two cities with different
entries in the database observe identical time zone rules today. In some
cases they only differed for a week a century ago. I would not consider
the TZ database or tzselect anything resembling a useful UI, although
it is an interesting exercise in completism.

-- 
see shy jo, still in his own timezone!


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Needed input from Australian users and developers:; choosing timezones for Australia in D-I

2011-03-23 Thread Rick Thomas


On Mar 23, 2011, at 1:42 PM, Joey Hess wrote:


Rick Thomas wrote:

For what it's worth, the timezone database (as evidenced by, among
other things, the output of the tzselect command) is organized
mostly in terms of country/city rather than country/larger-
geographical-area.


This is also largely misunderstood, as often two cities with different
entries in the database observe identical time zone rules today. In  
some
cases they only differed for a week a century ago. I would not  
consider

the TZ database or tzselect anything resembling a useful UI, although
it is an interesting exercise in completism.

--
see shy jo, still in his own timezone!


In that case, whatever d-i does for UI, it needs to warn folks that it  
may be necessary to do a dpkg-reconfigure tzdata after the install,  
if they care about getting the details exactly right of that week in  
2006 when Australia hosted the Commonwealth Games.


Call us crazy if you like, but some of us do care.


Rick


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4397de66-4e61-4f91-a081-7cf296917...@pobox.com



Re: Needed input from Australian users and developers:; choosing timezones for Australia in D-I

2011-03-23 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Ben Finney (ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au):
 Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org writes:
 
  I'm just not fond of Australia/Sydney presented as a choice, I'd
  rather have New South-Wales.
 
 (Regardless of what you choose, FYI it's “New South Wales”, no hyphen.)

Sure. If I finally decide to go for a list of states and territories
for AU, I'll look back at the ISO-3166-2 database and use the exact
wording there (which, I confirm, doesn't use hyphens, you're right).

 Why do you prefer that? Australia is highly urbanised; we're accustomed
 to “Sydney” as a stand-in for “New South Wales”. Moreover, it's very
 common for time zones around the world to be described by the dominant
 city of the region (“Tokyo time”, “London time”, etc). What makes you
 dislike it?

Probably a feeling that maybe that, time being decided by states, it
makes sense to refer to states. I agree this is somehow
borderlineand I think it's at least worth taking time to think
about this with the constant goal of keeping things as simple as
possible (leaving dpkg-reconfigure tzdata to very very picky people). 



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Needed input from Australian users and developers:; choosing timezones for Australia in D-I

2011-03-22 Thread Christian PERRIER
Hello,

I need some help from Australian people.

Debian Installer includes (in tzsetup) a way to choose a timezone
among multiple timezones, when users have picked a country that has
more than one timezone.

I'm currently working on this as things change constantly in such
matters.

As preliminary, please notice that the point is not giving a full
choice within the gazillion of possible timezones. See
dpkg-reconfigure tzdata. 

The timezone choice in D-I is supposed to be user-friendly and easy to
understand for the average citizen of the said country.

When it comes at Australia, the choice was, up to now:

 Lord Howe Island
 Hobart
 Melbourne
 Sydney
 Broken Hill
 Brisbane
 Lindeman
 Adelaide
 Darwin
 Perth
 Canberra
 Eucla
 Currie
 Yancowinna

That's indeed insane..:-). Hobart (Tasmania), Melbourne (Victoria),
Sydney (NSW) and Canberra (ACT) have the *exact* same time rules
(including DST). Lindeman island is in Queensland and uses the same
time than it. Broken Hill is only specific because, even if it's in NSW,
it follows South Australia time..

Indeed, after some study, Australia (excluding outside territories that have
their own ISO code anyway) has only 7 different time zones, as of
2011:

5 for the continent+Tasmania:
- Eastern Time with use of DST: Victoria, NSW, ACT, Tasmania
- Eastern Time withouty use of DST: Queensland
- Central Time with use of DST: South Australia
- Central Time without use of DST: Northern Territory
- Western Time without use of DST: Western Australia

2 more specific:
- Lord Howe Island
- Eyre Highway (also known as Eucla) using a funky UTC+8:45. That's
about 200 people, according to Wikipedia. This timezone is
unofficially called Central Western

I currently propose to offer the following choices in D-I:

 Victoria, ACT, NSW, Tasmania (Eastern Time, DST)
 Queensland (Eastern Time, no DST)
 South Australia (Central Time, DST)
 Northern Territory (Central Time, no DST)
 Western Australia (Western Time)
 Central Western Standard Time (Eucla)
 Lord Howe Island

Do you guys think this would be understandable to the average
Australian?

Would something hurt some feelings (such as mentioning Victoria before
NSW)?

An alternative was:
 Eastern Time with DST
 Eastern Time without DST
 Central Time with DST
 Central Time without DST
 Western Time
 Central Western Standard Time
 Lord Howe Island

PS: for those nitpicking folds among you, Cocos (Keeling), Christmas
and Norfolk Islands as well as the three Australian Antarctic
Territories are supposed to be covered by different choices when it
comes at country.

-- 




signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Needed input from Australian users and developers:; choosing timezones for Australia in D-I

2011-03-22 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Christian PERRIER wrote:

 I currently propose to offer the following choices in D-I:
 
  Victoria, ACT, NSW, Tasmania (Eastern Time, DST)
  Queensland (Eastern Time, no DST)
  South Australia (Central Time, DST)
  Northern Territory (Central Time, no DST)
  Western Australia (Western Time)
  Central Western Standard Time (Eucla)
  Lord Howe Island
 
 Do you guys think this would be understandable to the average
 Australian?

Yes, that sounds fine.
 
 Would something hurt some feelings (such as mentioning Victoria before
 NSW)?

No, but I live in NSW :-).

 An alternative was:
  Eastern Time with DST
  Eastern Time without DST
  Central Time with DST
  Central Time without DST
  Western Time
  Central Western Standard Time
  Lord Howe Island

I prefer the former options to this one,

Cheers,
Erik
-- 
--
Erik de Castro Lopo
http://www.mega-nerd.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20110323071700.436781e8.mle+deb...@mega-nerd.com



Re: Needed input from Australian users and developers:; choosing timezones for Australia in D-I

2011-03-22 Thread Alexander Zangerl
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 19:54:05 +0100, Christian PERRIER writes:
I currently propose to offer the following choices in D-I:

 Victoria, ACT, NSW, Tasmania (Eastern Time, DST)
 Queensland (Eastern Time, no DST)
 South Australia (Central Time, DST)
 Northern Territory (Central Time, no DST)
 Western Australia (Western Time)
 Central Western Standard Time (Eucla)
 Lord Howe Island

Do you guys think this would be understandable to the average
Australian?

that'll work fine.

An alternative was:
 Eastern Time with DST
 Eastern Time without DST
 Central Time with DST
 Central Time without DST
 Western Time
 Central Western Standard Time
 Lord Howe Island

not so great, because these are very uncommon. for example, you never
hear eastern time being used on the radio; here (qld/nsw border) they 
say it's hh:mm, that's hh+1:mm in nsw when we're in that fun period
of the year where there are two time zones within the reception area.

regards
az


-- 
+ Alexander Zangerl + DSA 42BD645D + (RSA 5B586291)
Anyway the :// part is an 'emoticon' representing a man with a strip
of sticky tape across his mouth. -- R. Douglas


signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature


Re: Needed input from Australian users and developers:; choosing timezones for Australia in D-I

2011-03-22 Thread Paul Fraser
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 09:34, Alexander Zangerl a...@debian.org wrote:

 not so great, because these are very uncommon. for example, you never
 hear eastern time being used on the radio; here (qld/nsw border) they
 say it's hh:mm, that's hh+1:mm in nsw when we're in that fun period
 of the year where there are two time zones within the reception area.


Actually, I regularly hear programs being advertised as starting at (for
example) 1pm eastern time or 1pm AEST when they actually mean 1pm
AEDST.


Re: Needed input from Australian users and developers:; choosing timezones for Australia in D-I

2011-03-22 Thread Ben Finney
Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org writes:

 The timezone choice in D-I is supposed to be user-friendly and easy to
 understand for the average citizen of the said country.

FWIW: the existing Australian timezone choice in D-I seems fine from the
point of view of the Australians I've seen do installs (including
myself).

 When it comes at Australia, the choice was, up to now:

  Lord Howe Island
  Hobart
  Melbourne
  Sydney
  Broken Hill
  Brisbane
  Lindeman
  Adelaide
  Darwin
  Perth
  Canberra
  Eucla
  Currie
  Yancowinna

 That's indeed insane..:-). Hobart (Tasmania), Melbourne (Victoria),
 Sydney (NSW) and Canberra (ACT) have the *exact* same time rules
 (including DST).

But they didn't always; and with the tendency of governments to flex
their arbitrary timezone powers, they may be different again in future.

People's knowledge of timezone rules tends (IME) to stick at the point
where they learned about a particular change which they had to learn; it
rarely gets updated. Hobart people will probably not know that
Melbourne's timezone is the same now, for example.

 Indeed, after some study, Australia (excluding outside territories
 that have their own ISO code anyway) has only 7 different time
 zones, as of 2011:

Which will likely change again in the future. We are cursed with
arbitrary government intervention in timezone rules, implemented with
little advance notice.

 I currently propose to offer the following choices in D-I:

  Victoria, ACT, NSW, Tasmania (Eastern Time, DST)
  Queensland (Eastern Time, no DST)
  South Australia (Central Time, DST)
  Northern Territory (Central Time, no DST)
  Western Australia (Western Time)
  Central Western Standard Time (Eucla)
  Lord Howe Island

 Do you guys think this would be understandable to the average
 Australian?

Yes. However, please ensure that no-one working on this gets the
impression this reduction in options is to be relied on; it's at the
whim of government that demonstrates frequent whimsy in adding as well
as reducing options.

 Would something hurt some feelings (such as mentioning Victoria before
 NSW)?

Inter-state rivalry is not something Australians get particularly upset
about; at least, not for something as inconsequential as which one gets
mentioned first in a list.

Maybe mention ACT first to defer to the nominal capital of the country.
Or not, as you choose; I doubt anyone will be upset.

 An alternative was:
  Eastern Time with DST
  Eastern Time without DST
  Central Time with DST
  Central Time without DST
  Western Time
  Central Western Standard Time
  Lord Howe Island

−1 for that. Average citizens can't be expected to know any name for
their time zone that isn't their name they for the region in which they
live (e.g. “Melbourne” or “Victoria”).

-- 
 \ “I have never imputed to Nature a purpose or a goal, or |
  `\anything that could be understood as anthropomorphic.” —Albert |
_o__)Einstein, unsent letter, 1955 |
Ben Finney


pgpqbDE3Fc8Y2.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Needed input from Australian users and developers:; choosing timezones for Australia in D-I

2011-03-22 Thread Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:28:18PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org writes:
[...]
That's indeed insane..:-). Hobart (Tasmania), Melbourne (Victoria),
Sydney (NSW) and Canberra (ACT) have the *exact* same time rules
(including DST).

But they didn't always; and with the tendency of governments to flex
their arbitrary timezone powers, they may be different again in future.

I fully agree with Ben.

People's knowledge of timezone rules tends (IME) to stick at the point
where they learned about a particular change which they had to learn; it
rarely gets updated. Hobart people will probably not know that
Melbourne's timezone is the same now, for example.

In 2006 we had to rush to update the zoneinfo data as the Victorian
government decided to have an extra week of Daylight Savings for the
Commonwealth Games. In Victoria we were on a different timezone to that
of the folks in New South Wales.

http://wiki.debian.org/TimeZoneChanges
http://lists.linux.org.au/pipermail/debian-au/2006-March/000289.html


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Needed input from Australian users and developers:; choosing timezones for Australia in D-I

2011-03-22 Thread Paul Wise
I agree with the other Australians in the thread; the east-coast
timezones are currently all the same but might not be in the future so
we shouldn't rely on them being the same and we should allow selection
of Australia/Sydney vs Australia/Melbourne.

I would suggest doing what Ubuntu do for timezone  locale selection;
have a geographical map that you click on that picks you a timezone
and probable locale bits. It could even zoom in to a specific region
for selection of those weird timezones like Eyre Highway. Obviously
this would only work for g-i not the text-based installer. The
text-based installer could use the GNOME strategy of providing a
search box to input your city/country and a list of possibly
corresponding timezones/locales.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTi=zOgYHduxP_Ewf40DfLiY=1H=vc2v451jx2...@mail.gmail.com



Re: Needed input from Australian users and developers:; choosing timezones for Australia in D-I

2011-03-22 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:18:04AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
 I agree with the other Australians in the thread; the east-coast
 timezones are currently all the same but might not be in the future so
 we shouldn't rely on them being the same and we should allow selection
 of Australia/Sydney vs Australia/Melbourne.
 
 I would suggest doing what Ubuntu do for timezone  locale selection;
 have a geographical map that you click on that picks you a timezone
 and probable locale bits. It could even zoom in to a specific region
 for selection of those weird timezones like Eyre Highway. Obviously
 this would only work for g-i not the text-based installer. The
 text-based installer could use the GNOME strategy of providing a
 search box to input your city/country and a list of possibly
 corresponding timezones/locales.

Then you have to maintain geographical coordinates for all those
regions.  And then you can get this sort of problem:

http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2003/08/22/54679.aspx

This may not apply to selection of cities, but then if one can only
select a city then it's not much of an improvement over the current
list.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking.
  - Albert Camus


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110323024429.gi2...@decadent.org.uk