apt-show-versions | grep /experimental
should work too, but I haven't tested it (no experimental packages
installed on this machine)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Le vendredi 20 janvier 2006 à 14:17 +, Paul Brossier a écrit :
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 04:09:28AM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Jérôme Warnier]
Or even better: a list of all packages already installed on my system
which have an experimental version?
There might be a better
Le vendredi 20 janvier 2006 à 15:04 +0100, Michal Politowski a écrit :
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:34:11 +0100, Jérôme Warnier wrote:
[...]
BTW, is there a way to list all packages in experimental?
aptitude search '~Aexperimental'
Or even better: a list of all packages already installed on
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 04:25:52PM +0100, Jérôme Warnier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
Le vendredi 20 janvier 2006 à 14:17 +, Paul Brossier a écrit :
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 04:09:28AM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Jérôme Warnier]
Or even better: a list of all packages
Le jeudi 19 janvier 2006 à 16:38 +, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
On Thursday, January 19, 2006 11:35 AM, Jérôme Warnier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After the last update of OOo in Sid (aka Unstable), I wonder if it is
generally considered acceptable to keep obsolete packages
[Jérôme Warnier]
Or even better: a list of all packages already installed on my system
which have an experimental version?
There might be a better way, but assuming you have experimental in your
sources.list...
t=$(tempfile);
awk $t '/^Package:/{print ^ $2 $}' \
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:34:11 +0100, Jérôme Warnier wrote:
[...]
BTW, is there a way to list all packages in experimental?
aptitude search '~Aexperimental'
Or even better: a list of all packages already installed on my system
which have an experimental version?
aptitude search
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 04:09:28AM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Jérôme Warnier]
Or even better: a list of all packages already installed on my system
which have an experimental version?
There might be a better way, but assuming you have experimental in your
sources.list...
aptitude
After the last update of OOo in Sid (aka Unstable), I wonder if it is
generally considered acceptable to keep obsolete packages in
experimental (currently, Sid has 2.0.1-2 and Experimental 2.0.1-1).
If not, is there a way to remove packages from Experimental?
Regards
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 12:35:45PM +0100, Jérôme Warnier wrote:
After the last update of OOo in Sid (aka Unstable), I wonder if it is
generally considered acceptable to keep obsolete packages in
experimental (currently, Sid has 2.0.1-2 and Experimental 2.0.1-1).
If not, is there a way
[Jérôme Warnier]
After the last update of OOo in Sid (aka Unstable), I wonder if it is
generally considered acceptable to keep obsolete packages in
experimental (currently, Sid has 2.0.1-2 and Experimental 2.0.1-1).
Hmmm, I thought experimental was garbage-collected automatically in
this case
Le jeudi 19 janvier 2006 à 12:43 +0100, Frank Lichtenheld a écrit :
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 12:35:45PM +0100, Jérôme Warnier wrote:
After the last update of OOo in Sid (aka Unstable), I wonder if it is
generally considered acceptable to keep obsolete packages in
experimental (currently, Sid
On Thursday, January 19, 2006 11:35 AM, Jérôme Warnier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After the last update of OOo in Sid (aka Unstable), I wonder if it is
generally considered acceptable to keep obsolete packages in
experimental (currently, Sid has 2.0.1-2 and Experimental 2.0.1-1).
Further
13 matches
Mail list logo
