On 04/18/2011 08:47 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 02:14:27AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> On 04/18/2011 03:03 PM, Soren Hansen wrote:
>>> Making the package lintian [clean] is a great goal!
>
>> It's not a goal, it's a requirement for any DD before uploading to the
>> arch
2011/4/18 Thomas Goirand :
> As for the fact that you had to release it with a schedule date, I
> *guessed* it myself. Only, saying it explicitly would have helped
> communication.
Sorry, I don't understand what you're saying here.
>> "most" being the operative word. You've proposed a bunch of ch
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 02:14:27AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 04/18/2011 03:03 PM, Soren Hansen wrote:
> > Making the package lintian [clean] is a great goal!
> It's not a goal, it's a requirement for any DD before uploading to the
> archive.
No, it's not.
--
Steve Langasek
On 04/18/2011 03:03 PM, Soren Hansen wrote:
> Making the package lintian is a great goal!
It's not a goal, it's a requirement for any DD before uploading to the
archive.
> I don't think any of the issues
> with the packages would be considered RC problems.
Missing (build-)dependencies are consid
On 04/17/2011 01:05 PM, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 10:43:43AM +0800, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
>>
>> Again, if other DDs want to participate to this packaging effort, you'd
>> be welcome. Especially, it seems that the current version of euca tools
>> are broken (uec-publish-tarb
2011/4/18 Thomas Goirand :
> On 04/18/2011 05:29 AM, Soren Hansen wrote:
>> 2011/4/16 Thomas Goirand :
>>> On 04/16/2011 01:32 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 16/04/11 at 10:43 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
What the state of collaboration with the upstream packagers?
>>> Replied more extensiv
2011/4/18 Clint Adams :
> On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 11:29:07PM +0200, Soren Hansen wrote:
>> This, even more than your constant lecturing on Debian policy, frankly
>> pisses me off.
>>
>> If you have something to say, at the very least have the guts to say
>> it in public, otherwise this collaboratio
On 04/18/2011 05:29 AM, Soren Hansen wrote:
> 2011/4/16 Thomas Goirand :
>> On 04/16/2011 01:32 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>>> On 16/04/11 at 10:43 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>>> What the state of collaboration with the upstream packagers?
>> Replied more extensively privately to that one.
>
> Th
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 11:29:07PM +0200, Soren Hansen wrote:
> This, even more than your constant lecturing on Debian policy, frankly
> pisses me off.
>
> If you have something to say, at the very least have the guts to say
> it in public, otherwise this collaboration ends right here.
I find it
2011/4/16 Thomas Goirand :
> On 04/16/2011 01:32 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> On 16/04/11 at 10:43 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> What the state of collaboration with the upstream packagers?
> Replied more extensively privately to that one.
This, even more than your constant lecturing on Debian p
- Original message -
> Le Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 10:43:43AM +0800, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
> >
> > Again, if other DDs want to participate to this packaging effort, you'd
> > be welcome. Especially, it seems that the current version of euca tools
> > are broken (uec-publish-tarball got me
Le Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 10:43:43AM +0800, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
>
> Again, if other DDs want to participate to this packaging effort, you'd
> be welcome. Especially, it seems that the current version of euca tools
> are broken (uec-publish-tarball got me stuck on my work for a week), and
> woul
On 04/16/2011 01:32 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 16/04/11 at 10:43 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is a short email to let everyone know about the current status of
>> the package.
>>
>> Cactus, the first serious release of Openstack Compute - nova, has been
>> released yesterday.
On 16/04/11 at 10:43 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a short email to let everyone know about the current status of
> the package.
>
> Cactus, the first serious release of Openstack Compute - nova, has been
> released yesterday. I have done loads of patches to have the package to
>
Hi,
This is a short email to let everyone know about the current status of
the package.
Cactus, the first serious release of Openstack Compute - nova, has been
released yesterday. I have done loads of patches to have the package to
fit in Debian, comply with the policy, and be lintian clean. The
15 matches
Mail list logo
