Ben Pfaff wrote:
(Maybe it's time to get rid of the autoconf2.13 package
altogether, come to think of it.)
It's still needed for just about everything put out by Mozilla, alas
(iceweasel et al, obviously, but also libnspr and libnss, which are
not just used by moz.org applications). There is
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 11:10:46PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
Ben Pfaff wrote:
(Maybe it's time to get rid of the autoconf2.13 package
altogether, come to think of it.)
It's still needed for just about everything put out by Mozilla, alas
(iceweasel et al, obviously, but also libnspr and
Michal Čihař ni...@debian.org writes:
Dne Sat, 25 Apr 2009 07:10:24 +0300
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net napsal(a):
Like lintian, your list falsely includes packages that use cdbs to build,
which automatically updates config.{sub,guess}.
If you don't build depend on autotools-dev,
Simon Josefsson wrote:
Michal Čihař ni...@debian.org writes:
Dne Sat, 25 Apr 2009 07:10:24 +0300
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net napsal(a):
Like lintian, your list falsely includes packages that use cdbs to build,
which automatically updates config.{sub,guess}.
If you don't build depend
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
Simon Josefsson wrote:
Michal ?iha? ni...@debian.org writes:
Dne Sat, 25 Apr 2009 07:10:24 +0300
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net napsal(a):
Like lintian, your list falsely includes packages that use cdbs to build,
which automatically updates
Hi
Dne Sat, 25 Apr 2009 07:10:24 +0300
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net napsal(a):
Like lintian, your list falsely includes packages that use cdbs to build,
which automatically updates config.{sub,guess}.
If you don't build depend on autotools-dev, nothing can be updated (at
least it was
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 10:15:18 +0800
Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
Would be nice to move this port to debian-ports.org IMO, since the
debian-ports wanna-build is already linked from the PTS.
This is the plan eventually, but at the moment we still rely on cross
built packages, so I figured it
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009, Michal ??iha?? wrote:
Dne Sat, 25 Apr 2009 07:10:24 +0300
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net napsal(a):
Like lintian, your list falsely includes packages that use cdbs to build,
which automatically updates config.{sub,guess}.
If you don't build depend on
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@debian.org writes:
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009, Michal ??iha?? wrote:
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net napsal(a):
Like lintian, your list falsely includes packages that use cdbs to build,
which automatically updates config.{sub,guess}.
If you don't build depend on
Hi,
In light of the recent outdated config.{sub,guess} discussion I have
decided to generate a list[0] of packages that have these files from before
June 2006, which is when the AVR32 architecture was added. The number
of affected packages comes to 620, and obviously filing 620 bugs seems
like
Bradley Smith bradsm...@debian.org writes:
The list was generated using lintian 2.2.9 with this[1] patch. It is
obviously possible that there are false positives in this list since the
files might be not be actually used in the build, or they are copied from
the host on clean etc. Please let
Bradley Smith bradsm...@debian.org (25/04/2009):
In light of the recent outdated config.{sub,guess} discussion I have
decided to generate a list[0] of packages that have these files from
before June 2006, which is when the AVR32 architecture was added.
Speaking of which, where can one read
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote:
Speaking of which, where can one read more about that port? Are there
build logs available (one might want to ease your task and keep an eye
on them for some given packages at least)?
http://avr32.debian.net/
On Saturday 25 April 2009 02:51:40 Bradley Smith wrote:
In light of the recent outdated config.{sub,guess} discussion I have
decided to generate a list[0] of packages that have these files from before
June 2006, which is when the AVR32 architecture was added.
The list was generated using
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
Like lintian, your list falsely includes packages that use cdbs to build,
which automatically updates config.{sub,guess}.
There doesn't seem to be a bug on lintian about this, please file one.
--
bye,
pabs
15 matches
Mail list logo
