On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 10:41:29AM +0200, Stefano Rivera wrote:
I started hacking on something like this in December, but quickly got
bored. Here's what I did:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=users/stefanor/repack-source.git
Interested?
While it sounds interesting I think after having
Hi Andreas (2012.01.13_23:07:52_+0200)
I wonder whether we should rather implement a fool proof solution which
can be simply used in get-orig-source targets (and as well in uscan).
I started hacking on something like this in December, but quickly got
bored. Here's what I did:
On Sat, 2012-01-14 at 10:41 +0200, Stefano Rivera wrote:
I was also trying to solve the timestamp problem, so that +dfsg / +ds
repacks could be done reproduceably.
Have you looked at Tardy?
http://tardy.sf.net/
It has numerous filters.
--
Peter Miller peter.miller@gmail.com
--
To
Le Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 01:58:50PM -0800, Russ Allbery a écrit :
However you generate the .orig.tar.gz file, you can then manage it with
pristine-tar, at least if you're using a VCS that pristine-tar supports.
The process when you repack upstream is really the same as when you just
download
Hi,
I was concerned about an issue Charles Plessy reported in a recent
thread on Debian Med when he realised that the directories in the
unpacked tarball are featuring his UID/GID. I simply looked into the
uscan source how it is be done there and found:
GZIP=-9 tar --owner=root --group=root
Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu writes:
I was concerned about an issue Charles Plessy reported in a recent
thread on Debian Med when he realised that the directories in the
unpacked tarball are featuring his UID/GID.
Do we care? Most upstream distribution tarballs are likewise going to
On Fri, 2012-01-13 at 22:07 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
I was concerned about an issue Charles Plessy reported in a recent
thread on Debian Med when he realised that the directories in the
unpacked tarball are featuring his UID/GID. I simply looked into the
uscan source how it is be done
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 01:12:32PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Do we care? Most upstream distribution tarballs are likewise going to
feature random UIDs and GIDs in the tarball because that's what you get
from tar if you don't take any special precautions.
I admit that the issue might not be
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 09:18:53PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2012-01-13 at 22:07 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
I was concerned about an issue Charles Plessy reported in a recent
thread on Debian Med when he realised that the directories in the
unpacked tarball are featuring his
Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu writes:
I admit that the issue might not be very important but I personally like
reproducible results (in the sense of same MD5sums). At least it can
not harm even if I admit that upstream does not care - in some points we
are better than upstream. So why not
10 matches
Mail list logo
