I'm Dodie Delosa you are the ones who did this I'll be in touch 814-550-4318
Hi,
On Tue, 05 May 2015 20:45:09 +0200
Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> In general my plan involves installing less, taking into
> consideration that requirements and expectations what should be
> available in containers, chroots, on servers and desktop systems has
> changed (at
Hi,
Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org (2015-05-05):
[ Please send replies only to boot@ ]
I would like to re-evaluate what we change by default for Stretch, that
is the list of packages with priorities required, important and
standard. In general my plan involves installing less, taking
Hi,
On Tue, 05 May 2015 20:45:09 +0200
Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org wrote:
I would like to re-evaluate what we change by default for Stretch, that
is the list of packages with priorities required, important and
standard. In general my plan involves installing less, taking into
On Wed, 6 May 2015 14:17:58 +0800
Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
it would be strange to not have a viewer for that documentation on
every system.
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html#s12.4
Probably minimal container (and embedded) systems don't need to have docs
and
I'd like to provide a data point. On servers that I maintain, this is
the complete list of manually-installed packages, excluding packages
related to what the server actually _does_ -- that is, this, and
nothing else, are what I consider vital to have available on a generic
server that no one
On Wed, May 6, 2015, at 10:59, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2015-05-06 11:21:13 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
dpkg --purge \
discover discover-data libdiscover2 installation-report laptop-detect \
nano tasksel tasksel-data task-english acpi acpid acpi-support-base \
isc-dhcp-client
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Josh Triplett wrote:
Why, when it's just an apt install at away? It's one more running
daemon. Realistically, what fraction of Debian users actually invoke
at, ever, and of those, what fraction will be deeply disturbed by having
to install it first?
The
On May 05, Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org wrote:
I would like to re-evaluate what we change by default for Stretch, that
Me too.
Let's look at the problem from a different point of view. This is what
I remove when building cloud images for my employer's infrastructure:
dpkg --purge \
On 05/06/2015 11:34 AM, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
On Tue May 05, 2015 at 20:45:09 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
* Packages currently at important:
- cron:
Not needed in chroot/container environments.
- demote to standard
RC.
| important
| Important programs, including
On Wednesday, May 6, 2015 5:21:14 AM EEST, Wookey wrote:
+++ Samuel Thibault [2015-05-06 01:09 +0200]:
Ansgar Burchardt, le Tue 05 May 2015 20:45:09 +0200, a écrit :
- info, texinfo, install-info:
I admit having used info only in desperation. Most documentation
comes in man
Hi,
On Tue May 05, 2015 at 20:45:09 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
* Packages currently at important:
- cron:
Not needed in chroot/container environments.
- demote to standard
RC.
| important
| Important programs, including those which one would expect to find on
| any
On May 06, Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org wrote:
That said, as mentioned in my response, I think rsyslog ought to stay
important
until something else replaces it. Logging of *some* kind is important.
We have journald. :-)
Why, when it's just an apt install at away? It's one more
On May 06, Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org wrote:
But is this enough reason to keep w3m at priority standard? Personally I
would rather use ssh -D or such than bothering with a rather limited
text-mode browser.
Agreed.
--
ciao,
Marco
pgppFLgum_uM8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
On 05/06/2015 11:34 AM, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
cron is part of POSIX.
The problem here is what the expectations of an experienced UNIX person are...
Perhaps unix/posix tasks would satisfy such folks.
--
bye,
pabs
Quoting Paul Wise (2015-05-06 08:17:58)
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Josh Triplett wrote:
Why, when it's just an apt install at away? It's one more running
daemon. Realistically, what fraction of Debian users actually invoke
at, ever, and of those, what fraction will be deeply
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 07:51:57AM +0200, Alexandre Detiste wrote:
Le mardi 5 mai 2015, 21:02:14 Josh Triplett a écrit :
Paul Wise wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 2:45 AM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
- cron:
Not needed in chroot/container environments.
- demote to
Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes:
- cron:
Not needed in chroot/container environments.
- demote to standard
A lot of packages ship cron jobs, I guess this means they will need to
depend on cron?
They already have to depend on cron if it is required for proper
operation (or
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 06:26:19PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
On 05/06/2015 11:34 AM, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
cron is part of POSIX.
The problem here is what the expectations of an experienced UNIX person
are...
Perhaps unix/posix tasks
On 2015-05-06 12:21:14 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
On 05/06/2015 11:34 AM, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
cron is part of POSIX.
The problem here is what the expectations of an experienced UNIX person
are... I hopefully count as having some experience, but I don't expect
cron to be available
Hi,
On Wed May 06, 2015 at 14:09:30 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
Note that I believe this has changed over time: with the advent of VMs
and containers the expectations what a system should minimally provide
have become smaller.
I'll not comment on where I see emacs and vim ;)
But
On Wed, 6 May 2015 18:26:19 +0800
Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
On 05/06/2015 11:34 AM, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
cron is part of POSIX.
The problem here is what the expectations of an experienced UNIX
person are...
Perhaps
On May 06, Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org wrote:
Note that I believe this has changed over time: with the advent of VMs
and containers the expectations what a system should minimally provide
have become smaller.
The differences between VMs and normal servers are very small, limited
only
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 02:21:06PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
ed needs to go back into important, so we can drop the other editors? /joke
We have vim-tiny in important, which provides ex, aka mostly ed.
Bastian
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
On 2015-05-06 11:21:13 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
dpkg --purge \
discover discover-data libdiscover2 installation-report laptop-detect \
nano tasksel tasksel-data task-english acpi acpid acpi-support-base \
isc-dhcp-client isc-dhcp-common eject \
nfacct libmnl0 libnetfilter-acct1
On 2015-05-06 11:21:13 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On May 05, Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org wrote:
- nfacct:
No idea why this is at Priority: important.
- demote to optional
Even extra... This is a very niche package and I have no idea why it is
being installed
On May 06, Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org wrote:
So, no, there isn't something broken - the uploader needs to file the
bug as set out in the developer reference.
And please have this fixed in stable as well.
--
ciao,
Marco
pgp6i77j5JMCo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 6 May 2015 16:09:18 +0200
Vincent Lefevre vinc...@vinc17.net wrote:
On 2015-05-06 11:21:13 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On May 05, Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org wrote:
- nfacct:
No idea why this is at Priority: important.
- demote to optional
Even extra...
On 5 May 2015 at 19:45, Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org wrote:
* Packages currently at important:
- cron:
Not needed in chroot/container environments.
Hm, i'd say it's not needed full-stop. There are systemd timer units
and e.g. systemd-cron that satisfy the need for periodic
On 2015-05-06 15:23:58 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
So, no, there isn't something broken - the uploader needs to file the
bug as set out in the developer reference.
Thanks for the information. To make sure that it is done and since
bugs.debian.org didn't show any such bug, I've just filed such a
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 2:45 AM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
* Same for question for dmidecode: could the priority be lowered to
standard?
As this relates to specific hardware/firmware, this should be moved to
optional and d-i/isenkram/PackageKit/etc should install it when
installing on the
Ansgar Burchardt, le Tue 05 May 2015 20:45:09 +0200, a écrit :
- info, texinfo, install-info:
I admit having used info only in desperation. Most documentation
comes in man page format.
- demote to optional
Proper autoconf, automake, gcc, etc. documentations only really
+++ Samuel Thibault [2015-05-06 01:09 +0200]:
Ansgar Burchardt, le Tue 05 May 2015 20:45:09 +0200, a écrit :
- info, texinfo, install-info:
I admit having used info only in desperation. Most documentation
comes in man page format.
- demote to optional
Proper
Paul Wise wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 2:45 AM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
- cron:
Not needed in chroot/container environments.
- demote to standard
A lot of packages ship cron jobs, I guess this means they will need to
depend on cron?
cron was never Essential: yes, so if
Hi,
Le mardi 5 mai 2015, 21:02:14 Josh Triplett a écrit :
Paul Wise wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 2:45 AM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
- cron:
Not needed in chroot/container environments.
- demote to standard
A lot of packages ship cron jobs, I guess this means they
Hi,
[ Please send replies only to boot@ ]
I would like to re-evaluate what we change by default for Stretch, that
is the list of packages with priorities required, important and
standard. In general my plan involves installing less, taking into
consideration that requirements and expectations
36 matches
Mail list logo