Re: Patch mgmt workflow proposal

2011-08-02 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Ben Finney [2011.08.02.0223 +0200]: > > This comes about ¾ of the way to the history pollution done by TopGit. > > I consider it very useful information, when needed. It's only pollution > if you let it be so. That is a very wise statement, and I agree. > > Not only would users pot

Re: Patch mgmt workflow proposal

2011-08-01 Thread Ben Finney
martin f krafft writes: > also sprach Thomas Koch [2011.08.01.1914 +0200]: > > So as a variation of the described workflow you can establish > > a special branch that holds references to all feature branch > > commits in its history. > > This comes about ¾ of the way to the history pollution don

Re: Patch mgmt workflow proposal

2011-08-01 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Thomas Koch [2011.08.01.1914 +0200]: > So as a variation of the described workflow you can establish > a special branch that holds references to all feature branch > commits in its history. This comes about ¾ of the way to the history pollution done by TopGit. Not only would users pot

Re: Patch mgmt workflow proposal

2011-08-01 Thread Thomas Koch
CC: debian-devel. Please subscribe to vcs-pkg-disc...@lists.alioth.debian.org to follow this topic! martin f krafft: > also sprach Thomas Koch [2011.07.30.1229 +0200]: > > Martin F. Krafft (madduck) was so kind to remind me posting this here. > > We're right now at debconf discussing different p