Re: Please test eglibc 2.9-23+multiarch.2 (was Please test eglibc 2.9-23+multiarch.1)

2009-08-03 Thread Bastian Blank
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 02:02:24AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: I have finally decided to remove the Depends: line in libc-bin, even if I don't really like that. My tests show that it works now, but don't hesitate to test it on your machine. What happens if someone install libc-bin without a

Re: Please test eglibc 2.9-23+multiarch.2 (was Please test eglibc 2.9-23+multiarch.1)

2009-08-03 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Bastian Blank a écrit : On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 02:02:24AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: I have finally decided to remove the Depends: line in libc-bin, even if I don't really like that. My tests show that it works now, but don't hesitate to test it on your machine. What happens if someone

Re: Please test eglibc 2.9-23+multiarch.2 (was Please test eglibc 2.9-23+multiarch.1)

2009-08-03 Thread Bastian Blank
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 11:38:32AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Bastian Blank a écrit : What happens if someone install libc-bin without a new libc6 then? Forgot about that variant before as it is not forbidden by deps now. If it is not the same major version, it will probably break, I'll

Please test eglibc 2.9-23+multiarch.2 (was Please test eglibc 2.9-23+multiarch.1)

2009-08-02 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 02:00:18PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: On 2009-07-29 22:12 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 04:10:27PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: In short it looks like a Pre-Depends is overkill, and that a Depends is enough. I'll upload a new version soon to