Re: Please test eglibc 2.9-23+multiarch.2 (was Please test eglibc 2.9-23+multiarch.1)
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 02:02:24AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: I have finally decided to remove the Depends: line in libc-bin, even if I don't really like that. My tests show that it works now, but don't hesitate to test it on your machine. What happens if someone install libc-bin without a new libc6 then? Forgot about that variant before as it is not forbidden by deps now. Bastian -- Genius doesn't work on an assembly line basis. You can't simply say, Today I will be brilliant. -- Kirk, The Ultimate Computer, stardate 4731.3 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Please test eglibc 2.9-23+multiarch.2 (was Please test eglibc 2.9-23+multiarch.1)
Bastian Blank a écrit : On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 02:02:24AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: I have finally decided to remove the Depends: line in libc-bin, even if I don't really like that. My tests show that it works now, but don't hesitate to test it on your machine. What happens if someone install libc-bin without a new libc6 then? Forgot about that variant before as it is not forbidden by deps now. If it is not the same major version, it will probably break, I'll add a conflict to fix that, but I fear we are going to have the same problem with apt again... -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Please test eglibc 2.9-23+multiarch.2 (was Please test eglibc 2.9-23+multiarch.1)
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 11:38:32AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Bastian Blank a écrit : What happens if someone install libc-bin without a new libc6 then? Forgot about that variant before as it is not forbidden by deps now. If it is not the same major version, it will probably break, I'll add a conflict to fix that, but I fear we are going to have the same problem with apt again... Yep. So I'm also out of options. The question is, how badly will it break the binaries in the package. Bastian -- Our missions are peaceful -- not for conquest. When we do battle, it is only because we have no choice. -- Kirk, The Squire of Gothos, stardate 2124.5 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Please test eglibc 2.9-23+multiarch.2 (was Please test eglibc 2.9-23+multiarch.1)
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 02:00:18PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: On 2009-07-29 22:12 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 04:10:27PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: In short it looks like a Pre-Depends is overkill, and that a Depends is enough. I'll upload a new version soon to experimental to fix that. eglibc version 2.9-23+multiarch.1 is now in incoming and will be on the mirrors soon. Please test and report problems. It still fails in my Lenny chroot: I have finally decided to remove the Depends: line in libc-bin, even if I don't really like that. My tests show that it works now, but don't hesitate to test it on your machine. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
