On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 12:45:13AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
Did you move bootlogd init script before udev? That should at least get
you a log and allow you to check the rest.
That worked, thanks. However, I just compared the contents of
/dev/.static/dev and /dev and I cannot see any device
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 11:49:55PM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote:
A new version of sysvinit (binary packages sysvinit, sysv-rc and initscripts)
has
just been uploaded to experimental.
Just tried it on amd64.
After rebooting you should have logs of the fsck runs in
/var/log/fsck/check{root,fs}.
On Tuesday 20 December 2005 00:29, Gabor Gombas wrote:
fsck logs are OK, /var/log/dmesg.0 is root:root instead of root:adm.
bottlogd is still broken.
Did you move bootlogd init script before udev? That should at least get
you a log and allow you to check the rest.
pgp8wK5rjLGkN.pgp
On Dec 18, Graham Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do not remember a consensus about this.
Changes in Debian are generally decided by package maintainers, not by
consensus.
Good to know. So I'm happy that nobody will complain when I will make
udev mandatory.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
[Marco d'Itri]
I do not remember a consensus about this.
Changes in Debian are generally decided by package maintainers, not by
consensus.
Good to know. So I'm happy that nobody will complain when I will make
udev mandatory.
You seem to have mixed up lack of complaints with decision
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 10:39:53AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
Changes in Debian are generally decided by package maintainers, not by
consensus.
Good to know. So I'm happy that nobody will complain when I will make
udev mandatory.
I won't complain, I'll just send a friendly assassin to your
Steinar H. Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I won't complain, I'll just send a friendly assassin to your house :-)
A friendly assasin? Is that the type that comes in, talks with you for a
while, and eventually offers you a poisioned beer?
--
To
A new version of sysvinit (binary packages sysvinit, sysv-rc and initscripts)
has
just been uploaded to experimental. The reason for sending it to experimental
is
that a large number of changes were made, thus increasing the probability of
errors.
And errors in sysvinit can be especially
On Dec 17, Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After installation you should have a tmpfs mounted on /run.
I do not remember a consensus about this.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 01:45:58AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Dec 17, Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After installation you should have a tmpfs mounted on /run.
I do not remember a consensus about this.
Changes in Debian are generally decided by package maintainers, not by
10 matches
Mail list logo
