* Tollef Fog Heen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait :
As you might have noticed, the last policy version (3.7.0) says that
web application packages must not put CGIs under `/usr/lib/cgi-bin'
anymore:
Given that apache2 has almost a magnitude more installations than all
the other web servers in
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 09:49:29AM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
In the meantime, do you suggest to use lintian overrides for fixing this
in webapp packages or purely ignoring the lintian complaints?
Given that there is no support for this from webserver maintainers and no
proposed migration
On 5/3/06, Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Using the path component cgi-lib which will even be visible to users
of the web server looks like a big chunk of NIH to me. Even worse, it
will break existing URLs when CGIs start to move to their location.
To be honest, I thought this policy
Alexis Sukrieh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Then, I don't understand why we have this discussion _after_ the policy
has been changed...
I thought the policy was a trustable document, where developers could
find guidelines for their work, it seems that it's not always true. Sad.
debian-policy,
Hello,
As you might have noticed, the last policy version (3.7.0) says that
web application packages must not put CGIs under `/usr/lib/cgi-bin'
anymore:
Quoting lintian:
This is done to avoid conflicts with the cgi-bin script alias,
which is reserved for the local use of webmasters.
hey alexis,
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 05:46:26PM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
As you might have noticed, the last policy version (3.7.0) says that
web application packages must not put CGIs under `/usr/lib/cgi-bin'
anymore:
snip
CGIs must be put under /usr/lib/cgi-lib now.
i'd hold off on that
Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
As you might have noticed, the last policy version (3.7.0) says that
web application packages must not put CGIs under `/usr/lib/cgi-bin'
anymore:
Quoting lintian:
This is done to avoid conflicts with the cgi-bin script alias,
which is reserved for the local
Re: Joey Hess 2006-05-03 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I won't discuss here the goodwill of this change, I just want to
point out that by now, 110 packages are RC bug candidates because of
this [2] (422 files installed inder `/usr/lib/cgi-bin').
Policy uses a should for this, so at most these would
Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
As you might have noticed, the last policy version (3.7.0) says that
web application packages must not put CGIs under `/usr/lib/cgi-bin'
anymore:
Given that apache2 has almost a magnitude more installations than all
the other web servers in Debian (sans apache 1)
9 matches
Mail list logo
