Re: [External] Re: Populating non-free firmware?
On 2022-12-25 13:21, Jonathan Carter wrote: > Hi Bastian > > On 2022/12/25 13:32, Bastian Blank wrote: >> AFAIK this requires a re-upload. However, does the installer properly >> include it yet? I need to check that. >> >> I can handle the main firmware packages maintained by the kernel team. > > Great! That covers a large percentage of them (and even most of the > important ones). > > So if we're going with maintainers-are-going-to-do-the-uploads, then > taking a cursory glance at what's left that seems important is: > > - firmware-sof-signed (maintainer: Mark Pearson) > - intel-microcode (maintainer: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh) > - amd64-microcode (maintainer: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh) > > Let me know what's needed :) I'll likely need help from Vincent Bernat as I'm not a true DM though Mark
Re: Populating non-free firmware?
On Sun, Dec 25, 2022, at 15:21, Jonathan Carter wrote: > So if we're going with maintainers-are-going-to-do-the-uploads, then > taking a cursory glance at what's left that seems important is: > > - firmware-sof-signed (maintainer: Mark Pearson) > - intel-microcode (maintainer: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh) > - amd64-microcode (maintainer: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh) Please email me directly when it is time to do such upload changing the archive section. I assume we (maintainers) don't need to do the usual dance of opening a bug to change the Dak override file for the package section ? There is no point to any uploads before that file is updated AFAIK. -- Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
Re: Populating non-free firmware?
Hi Bastian On 2022/12/25 13:32, Bastian Blank wrote: AFAIK this requires a re-upload. However, does the installer properly include it yet? I need to check that. I can handle the main firmware packages maintained by the kernel team. Great! That covers a large percentage of them (and even most of the important ones). So if we're going with maintainers-are-going-to-do-the-uploads, then taking a cursory glance at what's left that seems important is: - firmware-sof-signed (maintainer: Mark Pearson) - intel-microcode (maintainer: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh) - amd64-microcode (maintainer: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh) -Jonathan
Re: Populating non-free firmware?
On Sat, Dec 24, 2022 at 11:44:49AM +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote: > Will the archive team be moving those over? Is it up to firmware packagers > to re-upload it to the correct component? AFAIK this requires a re-upload. However, does the installer properly include it yet? I need to check that. I can handle the main firmware packages maintained by the kernel team. Bastian -- Captain's Log, star date 21:34.5...
Re: Populating non-free firmware?
On 25.12.22 00:31, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: The problem is a logistics one: the archives need to be split up, there needs to be a transition plan, maybe the easiest way is to do NMU uploads This is what (archive) overrides were invented for. However with the split maybe it'd be good for dak to temporarily export that component into both its own and non-free proper. That'd decouple the migration on the user side. Kind regards Philipp Kern
Re: Populating non-free firmware?
On Sat, Dec 24, 2022 at 03:22:17PM -0500, Timothy M Butterworth wrote: > On Sat, Dec 24, 2022 at 12:15 PM M. Zhou wrote: > > > On Sat, 2022-12-24 at 11:44 +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote: > > > > > > The non-free-firmware [component] has been created, but so far it > > > only > > > contains the rasbpi-firmware package. > > > > Please ensure to include the packages for wifi cards, especially > > the iwlwifi since I don't use desktop pc. > I don't think there's any dispute here: we'll put in all of the non-free firmware that's needed that's actually firmware. The problem is a logistics one: the archives need to be split up, there needs to be a transition plan, maybe the easiest way is to do NMU uploads As I read the DPL's message it's a "Hey, we need to do this now and time is running short, let's agree how to do it and actually do it" rather than not including one driver and not another. All best, as ever, Andy Cater
Re: Populating non-free firmware?
On Sat, Dec 24, 2022 at 12:15 PM M. Zhou wrote: > On Sat, 2022-12-24 at 11:44 +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote: > > > > The non-free-firmware [component] has been created, but so far it > > only > > contains the rasbpi-firmware package. > > Please ensure to include the packages for wifi cards, especially > the iwlwifi since I don't use desktop pc. > > One of the most painful ways to install Debian is to realize that > iwlwifi is missing during the netinstall process, while RJ45 cable > is not available. As a result, one may download the package using > cellphone and find a way to transmit that file to the laptop. > If it's iphone then game is sadly over. > > In the past, such frustration had once irritated one of the new > users to whom I have recommended Debian. The user's anger has > finally converted into personal/emotional attacks, blaming > me as a Debian developer being incompetent to make the wifi > card working. As a result, I as a Debian developer, would never > recommend Debian to any new user, nor discussing linux with > any new user since then. > > iwlwifi is the very only reason that forced me to never use the > the default iso again. > > That said, my word only counts as a vote for the wifi card packages. > Just wanted to mention that iwlwifi may hurt people. > > I agree WiFi is needed. I have Realtek and it needs non-free firmware. I also need the binary blobs for AMD Radeon. I use the non-free installer. If not all firmware is going to be included in the installer will there still be a non-free installer image? -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian - The universal operating system ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://www.debian.org/ ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀
Re: Populating non-free firmware?
On Sat, 2022-12-24 at 11:44 +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote: > > The non-free-firmware [component] has been created, but so far it > only > contains the rasbpi-firmware package. Please ensure to include the packages for wifi cards, especially the iwlwifi since I don't use desktop pc. One of the most painful ways to install Debian is to realize that iwlwifi is missing during the netinstall process, while RJ45 cable is not available. As a result, one may download the package using cellphone and find a way to transmit that file to the laptop. If it's iphone then game is sadly over. In the past, such frustration had once irritated one of the new users to whom I have recommended Debian. The user's anger has finally converted into personal/emotional attacks, blaming me as a Debian developer being incompetent to make the wifi card working. As a result, I as a Debian developer, would never recommend Debian to any new user, nor discussing linux with any new user since then. iwlwifi is the very only reason that forced me to never use the the default iso again. That said, my word only counts as a vote for the wifi card packages. Just wanted to mention that iwlwifi may hurt people.
Populating non-free firmware?
Hi Debianites Earlier this year, we had a [vote] where we concluded that we'd include non-free firmware in the upcoming Debian 12 release. Steve posted a summary of [next steps] to this list, but it seems like we have some steps missing. The non-free-firmware [component] has been created, but so far it only contains the rasbpi-firmware package. I recall seeing various discussions about /what/ should be included in non-free-firmware (packages that install files under /lib/firmware seems like a reasonable approach), but it's unclear how that's going to happen. Will the archive team be moving those over? Is it up to firmware packagers to re-upload it to the correct component? As far as I recall, there was also some discussion between archive admins on whether non-free-firmware should contain copies of packages, or whether the packages should be moved (along with migration concerns for the latter). Since we're so close to freeze, and since there are lots of bits that will be depending on this if we are to implement this for Debian 12, can we have some basic plan and communication put together for this so that everyone knows what to expect? Thanks to everyone involved in this and putting in the work to make it happen! -Jonathan [vote] https://www.debian.org/vote/2022/vote_003 [next steps] https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20221002142736.ga1700...@tack.einval.com [component] http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/non-free-firmware/
