On 20 September 2019 at 13:27, Ian Jackson wrote:
| Dirk Eddelbuettel writes ("Re: Possible doc package side-effect from going
source-only upload [and 1 more messages]"):
| > -build: build-arch
| > +## edd 19 Sep 2019 for source uploads also build build-indep
| > +build: bui
Dirk Eddelbuettel writes ("Re: Possible doc package side-effect from going
source-only upload [and 1 more messages]"):
> -build: build-arch
> +## edd 19 Sep 2019 for source uploads also build build-indep
> +build: build-arch build-indep
>
> build-arch: make-arch
&
On 19 September 2019 at 20:40, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| On 19 September 2019 at 16:03, Guillem Jover wrote:
| | On Thu, 2019-09-19 at 07:15:43 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| | > So presumably the dependency graph within debian/rules is wrong. Would
| | > anybody here know
| | >
| | > -
Dirk Eddelbuettel writes ("Re: Possible doc package side-effect from going
source-only upload [and 1 more messages]"):
> On 19 September 2019 at 14:51, Ian Jackson wrote:
> | This would be a good idea. It is quite some effort but I think you
> | would be rewarded with
Ian, Guillem,
On 19 September 2019 at 14:51, Ian Jackson wrote:
| Dirk Eddelbuettel writes ("Possible doc package side-effect from going
source-only upload"):
| > Maybe someone on the list can help with a sharp insight before I go trying.
| >
| > The r-base source package (for the R system
Dirk Eddelbuettel writes ("Possible doc package side-effect from going
source-only upload"):
> Maybe someone on the list can help with a sharp insight before I go trying.
>
> The r-base source package (for the R system and language) has a somewhat
> cobbled together debian/rules [1], mostly of
6 matches
Mail list logo
