I was under the impression that xcompat is needed to run non-Debian
binaries that were compiled against old libs. I believe that may be true
That is possible (xcompat is an a.out library.) I haven't heard
direct reports of such (and xcompat is still dead -- there were never
real sources
On 18 Jun 1997, Mark Eichin wrote:
xcompat is dead (ie. it dates from when those were valid... since no
current packages need those virtual names, xcompat isn't needed either.)
I was under the impression that xcompat is needed to run non-Debian
binaries that were compiled against old libs. I
Mark Eichin wrote:
xcompat is dead (ie. it dates from when those were valid... since no
current packages need those virtual names, xcompat isn't needed either.)
I need xcompat to run Maple VR3.
--
Thomas Koenig, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The joy of engineering is to find a straight
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi folks!
On Wed, 18 Jun 1997, Igor Grobman wrote (cf. bug #10676):
Package: debian-policy
Version: 2.1.3.3
X11R6 virtual package is not marked obsolete in virtual packages list. I
got bitten by this one when packaging dotfile generator. I suspect
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Christian Schwarz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There is a virtual package imap-client which is suggested by imap-4
(Suggests: pine | imap-client) but no package seems to provide it. Thus, I
suggest to remove this entry, too:
imap-client Any
5 matches
Mail list logo
