Re: RFC: autobuilder pseudo-package
Holger Levsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, On Tuesday 25 September 2007 12:25, Simon Richter wrote: inspired by the how to detect if inside a buildd chroot thread: would it make sense to have an (empty) package autobuilder that all packages that are not supposed to be installed on autobuilders (daemons, packages requiring interactive configuration, ...) can conflict against? Interactive configuration must be done via debconf by now. And not wanting to start daemon can have other reasons than autobuilders, eg. eg. chroots, fai's nfsroot, piuparts... so autobuilder is not a good name. regards, Holger I also would not make it empty but have it come with a policy-rc.d script that returns 101. That way it nicely disables all daemons for you. Also you could have some debconf configuration to set the hostname and prompts to reflect it is a chroot. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RFC: autobuilder pseudo-package
Hi, inspired by the how to detect if inside a buildd chroot thread: would it make sense to have an (empty) package autobuilder that all packages that are not supposed to be installed on autobuilders (daemons, packages requiring interactive configuration, ...) can conflict against? Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFC: autobuilder pseudo-package
Simon Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, inspired by the how to detect if inside a buildd chroot thread: would it make sense to have an (empty) package autobuilder that all packages that are not supposed to be installed on autobuilders (daemons, packages requiring interactive configuration, ...) can conflict against? Simon Just in case some depends pulls it in unintentionally? In that case I think sbuild would just happily remove it and that would be that. Or do you want to make it essential? :) At a minimum you need sbuild to know about it. But I haven't yet seen why rc policy settings should not do the trick. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFC: autobuilder pseudo-package
Hi, On Tuesday 25 September 2007 12:25, Simon Richter wrote: inspired by the how to detect if inside a buildd chroot thread: would it make sense to have an (empty) package autobuilder that all packages that are not supposed to be installed on autobuilders (daemons, packages requiring interactive configuration, ...) can conflict against? Interactive configuration must be done via debconf by now. And not wanting to start daemon can have other reasons than autobuilders, eg. eg. chroots, fai's nfsroot, piuparts... so autobuilder is not a good name. regards, Holger pgp0P43WRXgeY.pgp Description: PGP signature
